TG-RS-2
TrustGate Replay Specification 2
Part 7 — DAL Replay
7.1. Purpose
DAL Replay defines the constitutional mechanisms for reconstructing and verifying the cryptographic integrity of constitutional artifacts recorded within the Distributed Assurance Ledger (DAL).
Rather than replaying the ledger infrastructure itself, DAL Replay reconstructs the constitutional integrity chain represented by the ledger, allowing independent verification of authenticity, immutability, chronology, and provenance.
DAL Replay provides the constitutional integrity foundation for long-term assurance, federation, certification, and regulatory audit.
This specification is normative.
7.2. Constitutional Principles
DAL Replay shall satisfy the following constitutional principles.
Integrity Preservation
Replay shall preserve cryptographic integrity.
Immutability
Published constitutional artifacts shall remain immutable.
Authenticity
Replay shall verify constitutional authenticity.
Chronological Consistency
Replay shall preserve constitutional chronology.
Technology Independence
Replay shall remain independent of the underlying ledger implementation.
7.3. Constitutional DAL Replay Model
DAL Replay reconstructs the constitutional integrity chain.
Replay Manifest
│
▼
Replay Context
│
▼
Replay Package
│
▼
Artifact Hash Resolution
│
▼
Signature Verification
│
▼
DAL Anchor Resolution
│
▼
Integrity Verification
│
▼
Replay Verification
Replay reconstructs constitutional integrity rather than ledger infrastructure.
7.4. DAL Context
Replay establishes the constitutional DAL Context.
DAL Context includes:
- Replay Manifest;
- Replay Package;
- DAL references;
- cryptographic algorithms;
- signing policies;
- hash algorithms;
- anchor identifiers;
- constitutional framework versions;
- execution profile (XPID).
The DAL Context remains immutable throughout replay.
7.5. Constitutional Integrity Chain
Replay reconstructs the complete constitutional integrity chain.
CSI / USO
│
▼
TG-VRES
│
▼
VEVID
│
▼
TOID
│
▼
TVID
│
▼
Trust Status
│
▼
TG-ATTEST
│
▼
TG-INTEL
│
▼
Replay Package
│
▼
DAL Anchor
Every constitutional relationship shall remain independently verifiable.
7.6. Hash Verification
Replay verifies the cryptographic hashes associated with constitutional artifacts.
Representative verification includes:
- canonical artifact hashes;
- Replay Package hash;
- Replay Manifest hash;
- TG-ATTEST hash;
- TG-INTEL hash;
- integrity digests;
- checksum validation.
Hash verification confirms constitutional immutability.
7.7. Signature Verification
Replay verifies constitutional signatures protecting replay artifacts.
Verification includes:
- digital signatures;
- public key validation;
- certificate validation;
- signing authority;
- signature algorithms;
- signing chronology.
Replay verifies signatures without regenerating them.
7.8. DAL Anchor Verification
Replay verifies constitutional ledger anchors.
Representative verification includes:
- anchor identifier;
- anchor timestamp;
- anchor hash;
- ledger reference;
- anchor status;
- issuer reference;
- integrity confirmation.
Replay confirms that every constitutional artifact corresponds to its published integrity anchor.
7.9. Replay Integrity Outcomes
DAL Replay produces one of the following constitutional outcomes.
| Outcome | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Verified | Integrity successfully confirmed |
| Equivalent | Constitutionally equivalent integrity confirmed |
| Divergent | Integrity discrepancy detected |
| Missing Anchor | Required anchor unavailable |
| Invalid Signature | Signature verification failed |
| Invalid Hash | Hash mismatch detected |
| Invalid | Replay contract violated |
Replay outcomes are immutable constitutional artifacts.
7.10. Replay Telemetry
DAL Replay emits constitutional telemetry throughout execution.
Representative telemetry includes:
- Replay Identifier;
- Replay Package;
- Replay Manifest;
- DAL Anchor;
- hash verification;
- signature verification;
- anchor verification;
- execution chronology;
- XPID;
- MEID;
- verification outcome.
Replay telemetry contributes to constitutional provenance.
7.11. Constitutional Integrity Verification
Replay verifies the integrity of every constitutional artifact participating in replay.
Representative artifact families include:
| Artifact Family | Integrity Verification |
|---|---|
| CSI | Identity verification |
| USO | Signal integrity |
| TG-VRES | Validation integrity |
| VEVID | Evidence integrity |
| TOID | Trust Object integrity |
| TVID | Trust Vector integrity |
| TG-ATTEST | Assurance integrity |
| TG-INTEL | Intelligence integrity |
| Replay Package | Replay integrity |
| Replay Manifest | Replay contract integrity |
Replay shall preserve integrity across the complete constitutional assurance chain.
7.12. Federation Integrity
DAL Replay supports constitutional verification across federated ECOs.
Replay verifies:
- originating E-C-O™ Number;
- federation profile;
- anchor continuity;
- signature continuity;
- constitutional lineage;
- cross-ECO integrity.
Replay preserves constitutional trust across federation boundaries.
7.13. Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks
DAL Replay integrates with:
| Framework | Contribution |
|---|---|
| DAL | Cryptographic integrity |
| CIA | Constitutional identity |
| CALM | Lifecycle governance |
| CPA | Persistent replay storage |
| CIR | Identifier resolution |
| TrustGate Attestation Catalog | Assurance verification |
| Replay Model | Replay orchestration |
| TG-INTEL | Intelligence integrity |
DAL Replay complements these frameworks without redefining them.
7.14. Constitutional Constraints
DAL Replay shall satisfy the following requirements.
- Every replay shall preserve constitutional hashes.
- Every replay shall preserve constitutional signatures.
- Every replay shall preserve anchor identity.
- Replay shall preserve chronological ordering.
- Replay shall preserve provenance.
- Replay shall remain deterministic.
- Replay shall remain independently verifiable.
- Replay shall never regenerate constitutional anchors.
These constraints are normative.
7.15. Constitutional Invariants
DAL Replay preserves the following invariant families.
| Invariant Family | Constitutional Requirement |
|---|---|
| IF-100 | Identity preserved |
| IF-200 | Lineage preserved |
| IF-300 | Integrity preserved |
| IF-400 | Signature continuity preserved |
| IF-500 | Anchor continuity preserved |
| IF-600 | Replay determinism preserved |
Violation of these invariants constitutes a constitutional replay failure.
7.16. Future Evolution
Future constitutional capabilities may extend DAL Replay through:
- post-quantum cryptography;
- decentralized trust infrastructures;
- multi-ledger verification;
- distributed integrity services;
- Constitutional Assurance Chain (CAC);
- Canonical Replay Architecture (CRA).
Future extensions shall preserve constitutional semantics.
7.17. Summary
DAL Replay defines the constitutional mechanisms for reconstructing and verifying the cryptographic integrity of constitutional artifacts.
By replaying immutable hashes, digital signatures, Replay Packages, Replay Manifests, TG-ATTEST artifacts, TG-INTEL references, and Distributed Assurance Ledger (DAL) anchors under the Canonical Identity Architecture (CIA), Canonical Artifact Lifecycle Model (CALM), Canonical Persistence Architecture (CPA), and Canonical Identifier Registry (CIR), DAL Replay guarantees that constitutional integrity remains independently verifiable, technology independent, and trustworthy across federated ecosystems and throughout the lifetime of the ZAYAZ platform.
Part 8 — Federation Replay
8.1. Purpose
Federation Replay defines the constitutional mechanisms for reconstructing and verifying replay artifacts exchanged between trusted ECOs participating in the TrustGate Federation.
Rather than reproducing the internal execution environment of another ECO, Federation Replay reconstructs the constitutional assurance chain represented by exchanged constitutional artifacts.
Federation Replay enables independent verification while preserving organizational autonomy, confidentiality, and constitutional interoperability.
This specification is normative.
8.2. Constitutional Principles
Federation Replay shall satisfy the following constitutional principles.
Sovereignty
Each ECO remains authoritative for its own constitutional artifacts.
Independent Verification
Receiving ECOs shall independently verify exchanged replay artifacts.
Constitutional Identity
Federation shall preserve immutable constitutional identities.
Provenance
Replay shall preserve the originating ECO and constitutional lineage.
Technology Independence
Federation Replay shall remain independent of implementation technology.
8.3. Constitutional Federation Replay Model
Federation Replay reconstructs the constitutional assurance chain exchanged between ECOs.
Originating ECO
│
▼
Replay Package
│
▼
Replay Manifest
│
▼
TG-ATTEST
│
▼
Federation Exchange
│
▼
Receiving ECO
│
▼
Federation Replay
│
▼
Independent Verification
Replay reconstructs constitutional assurance rather than foreign runtime execution.
8.4. Federation Replay Context
Federation Replay establishes a constitutional replay context for exchanged artifacts.
The Federation Replay Context includes:
- Replay Manifest;
- Replay Package;
- TG-ATTEST;
- TAID;
- originating E-C-O™ Number;
- receiving E-C-O™ Number;
- federation profile;
- constitutional framework versions;
- execution profile (XPID).
The replay context remains immutable throughout federation verification.
8.5. Federation Artifact Resolution
Replay resolves every constitutional artifact exchanged through federation.
Representative artifacts include:
- CSI;
- USO instances;
- TG-VRES;
- VEVID;
- TOID;
- TVID;
- TG-ATTEST;
- Replay Package;
- Replay Manifest;
- TG-INTEL;
- DAL references.
Replay shall preserve originating constitutional identity.
8.6. Cross-ECO Identity Verification
Replay verifies the constitutional identity of every exchanged artifact.
Verification includes:
- originating E-C-O™ Number;
- constitutional issuer;
- TAID;
- TIID;
- VRID;
- TOID;
- TVID;
- Replay identifiers;
- DAL references.
Identity verification is governed by the Canonical Identity Architecture (CIA).
8.7. Federation Assurance Verification
Replay reconstructs the constitutional assurance chain issued by another ECO.
Originating ECO
│
▼
Validation
│
▼
Trust
│
▼
TG-ATTEST
│
▼
Replay Package
│
▼
DAL Anchor
│
▼
Receiving ECO Verification
Replay confirms constitutional validity without modifying originating artifacts.
8.8. Federation Trust Preservation
Replay preserves constitutional trust across federation boundaries.
Replay verifies:
- trust provenance;
- constitutional evidence;
- assurance continuity;
- issuer authenticity;
- policy compatibility;
- replay equivalence.
Trust remains attributable to the originating ECO.
8.9. Federation Replay Outcomes
Federation Replay produces one of the following constitutional outcomes.
| Outcome | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Verified | Federation replay successfully verified |
| Equivalent | Constitutionally equivalent assurance confirmed |
| Divergent | Constitutional discrepancy detected |
| Untrusted Issuer | Issuing ECO not trusted |
| Policy Conflict | Federation policy mismatch |
| Incomplete | Required constitutional artifacts unavailable |
| Invalid | Replay contract violated |
Replay outcomes are immutable constitutional artifacts.
8.10. Federation Telemetry
Federation Replay emits constitutional telemetry.
Representative telemetry includes:
- Replay Identifier;
- originating E-C-O™ Number;
- receiving E-C-O™ Number;
- federation profile;
- TAID;
- Replay Package;
- Replay Manifest;
- verification chronology;
- XPID;
- verification outcome.
Replay telemetry contributes to constitutional provenance.
8.11. Federation Policies
Federation Replay shall respect constitutional federation policies.
Representative policies include:
- trusted federation members;
- accepted assurance levels;
- accepted attestation types;
- replay permissions;
- confidentiality requirements;
- jurisdictional restrictions;
- regulatory obligations.
Replay shall never bypass constitutional federation policies.
8.12. Federation Replay Profiles
Replay behaviour may vary according to the applicable Federation Profile.
Illustrative profiles include:
| Profile | Purpose |
|---|---|
| FP-OPEN | Public constitutional verification |
| FP-PARTNER | Trusted partner replay |
| FP-REGULATORY | Regulatory assurance replay |
| FP-AUDIT | Independent audit replay |
| FP-PRIVATE | Confidential bilateral replay |
Federation Profiles are defined in the TrustGate Federation Profiles specification.
8.13. Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks
Federation Replay integrates with:
| Framework | Contribution |
|---|---|
| TrustGate Federation Profiles | Federation governance |
| TrustGate Attestation Catalog | Assurance verification |
| Replay Model | Replay orchestration |
| CIA | Constitutional identity |
| CALM | Lifecycle governance |
| CPA | Replay persistence |
| CIR | Identifier resolution |
| TG-INTEL | Intelligence provenance |
| DAL | Integrity verification |
Federation Replay complements these frameworks without redefining them.
8.14. Constitutional Constraints
Federation Replay shall satisfy the following requirements.
- Replay shall preserve originating constitutional identity.
- Replay shall preserve constitutional lineage.
- Replay shall preserve issuer sovereignty.
- Replay shall remain independently verifiable.
- Replay shall preserve replay equivalence.
- Replay shall preserve federation provenance.
- Replay shall remain deterministic.
- Replay shall never modify exchanged constitutional artifacts.
These constraints are normative.
8.15. Constitutional Invariants
Federation Replay preserves the following invariant families.
| Invariant Family | Constitutional Requirement |
|---|---|
| IF-100 | Identity preserved |
| IF-200 | Provenance preserved |
| IF-300 | Federation sovereignty preserved |
| IF-400 | Assurance continuity preserved |
| IF-500 | Trust continuity preserved |
| IF-600 | Replay determinism preserved |
Violation of these invariants constitutes a constitutional replay failure.
8.16. Future Evolution
Future constitutional capabilities may extend Federation Replay through:
- distributed replay networks;
- multi-jurisdiction replay;
- zero-knowledge replay verification;
- selective disclosure of constitutional artifacts;
- Constitutional Assurance Chain (CAC);
- Canonical Replay Architecture (CRA);
- cross-federation trust orchestration.
Future extensions shall preserve constitutional semantics.
8.17. Summary
Federation Replay defines the constitutional mechanisms for independently reconstructing and verifying replay artifacts exchanged between trusted ECOs.
By replaying immutable Replay Packages, Replay Manifests, TG-ATTEST artifacts, constitutional identities, and Distributed Assurance Ledger (DAL) references under the Canonical Identity Architecture (CIA), Canonical Artifact Lifecycle Model (CALM), Canonical Persistence Architecture (CPA), TrustGate Federation Profiles, and the Canonical Identifier Registry (CIR), Federation Replay guarantees that constitutional assurance remains verifiable across organizational boundaries while preserving sovereignty, provenance, interoperability, and long-term trust.
Part 9 — Replay & TG-INTEL
9.1. Purpose
Replay & TG-INTEL defines the constitutional relationship between deterministic replay and Constitutional Trust Intelligence (TG-INTEL).
Replay reconstructs constitutional execution and assurance.
TG-INTEL derives constitutional understanding from replayable constitutional evidence.
Replay shall never attempt to reproduce AI reasoning.
Instead, Replay reconstructs the complete constitutional foundation upon which intelligence artifacts were generated.
This specification is normative.
9.2. Constitutional Principles
Replay and TG-INTEL shall satisfy the following constitutional principles.
Separation of Responsibilities
Replay reconstructs constitutional execution.
TG-INTEL produces constitutional understanding.
These responsibilities shall remain independent.
Constitutional Explainability
Every intelligence artifact shall reference replayable constitutional evidence.
Deterministic Foundation
Replay shall provide deterministic constitutional inputs.
Evolutionary Intelligence
AI models may evolve over time provided their outputs remain constitutionally explainable.
Immutable Provenance
Every intelligence artifact shall preserve immutable constitutional lineage.
9.3. Constitutional Intelligence Architecture
Replay provides the constitutional substrate for intelligence.
Replay Package
│
▼
Replay Verification
│
▼
Constitutional Evidence
│
▼
TG-INTEL
│
▼
Constitutional Understanding
│
▼
Recommendations
Predictions
Insights
Decisions
Replay establishes constitutional certainty.
TG-INTEL establishes constitutional understanding.
9.4. Constitutional Intelligence Inputs
TG-INTEL derives intelligence exclusively from constitutional artifacts.
Representative inputs include:
- CSI;
- USO instances;
- TG-SIGNAL;
- TG-VRES;
- VEVID;
- TOIDs;
- TVIDs;
- Trust Status;
- TG-ATTEST;
- Replay Manifest;
- Replay Package;
- DAL anchors;
- federation artifacts.
Every referenced artifact shall remain replayable.
9.5. TIID — Trust Intelligence Identifier
Every constitutional intelligence artifact shall possess a globally unique Trust Intelligence Identifier (TIID).
A TIID identifies a single immutable intelligence artifact and enables replay, lineage, federation, and explainability.
Representative TIID metadata includes:
| Property | Description |
|---|---|
| TIID | Canonical Trust Intelligence Identifier |
| Intelligence Type | Descriptive, Diagnostic, Predictive, Prescriptive, etc. |
| Producer | Originating E-C-O™ Number |
| Replay Package | Source replay package |
| Replay Manifest | Governing replay contract |
| TG-ATTEST | Supporting assurance artifact |
| Generation Timestamp | Intelligence creation time |
| Lifecycle State | CALM state |
TIIDs shall be globally unique and immutable.
9.6. Intelligence Provenance
Every TG-INTEL artifact shall preserve complete constitutional provenance.
Representative provenance includes:
- TIID;
- Replay Identifier;
- Replay Manifest;
- Replay Package;
- TG-ATTEST;
- TG-VRES;
- VEVID;
- TOID;
- TVID;
- originating E-C-O™ Number;
- DAL references;
- execution chronology.
No TG-INTEL artifact shall exist without constitutional provenance.
9.7. Constitutional Intelligence Replay
Replay reconstructs the constitutional basis of intelligence.
Replay verifies:
- referenced constitutional artifacts;
- assurance chain;
- trust dependencies;
- provenance;
- replay equivalence;
- constitutional lineage.
Replay explicitly does not regenerate:
- neural network outputs;
- LLM responses;
- optimization paths;
- recommendation engines;
- probabilistic inference.
Replay verifies constitutional evidence—not AI computation.
9.8. Intelligence Categories
Replay supports constitutional verification across multiple intelligence categories.
| Category | Constitutional Question |
|---|---|
| Descriptive | What happened? |
| Diagnostic | Why did it happen? |
| Predictive | What may happen? |
| Prescriptive | What should be done? |
| Compliance | What obligations apply? |
| Assurance | Can this be trusted? |
| Federation | What do partner ECOs report? |
| Constitutional | How is the platform behaving? |
Replay verifies the constitutional evidence supporting every category.
9.9. Constitutional Learning
Replay provides the foundation for Constitutional Learning.
Replay enables learning without modifying historical constitutional evidence.
Illustrative learning cycle:
Collect
│
▼
Observe
│
▼
Assure
│
▼
Replay
│
▼
TG-INTEL
│
▼
Understand
│
▼
Need
│
▼
Treat
│
▼
Exchange
Replay transforms assured constitutional evidence into explainable constitutional understanding.
9.10. Replay Outcomes
Replay verification for TG-INTEL produces one of the following constitutional outcomes.
| Outcome | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Verified | Constitutional intelligence foundation verified |
| Equivalent | Equivalent constitutional evidence confirmed |
| Divergent | Intelligence references inconsistent |
| Incomplete | Required constitutional artifacts unavailable |
| Invalid | Replay contract violated |
Replay outcomes are immutable constitutional artifacts.
9.11. Replay Telemetry
Replay emits constitutional telemetry supporting intelligence verification.
Representative telemetry includes:
- Replay Identifier;
- TIID;
- Replay Manifest;
- Replay Package;
- TG-ATTEST;
- XPID;
- MEID;
- referenced constitutional artifacts;
- verification chronology;
- verification outcome.
Replay telemetry contributes to constitutional explainability.
9.12. Federation Intelligence
Replay supports constitutional verification of intelligence exchanged between trusted ECOs.
Receiving ECOs verify:
- constitutional provenance;
- trust continuity;
- attestation continuity;
- replay equivalence;
- federation policies;
- TIID lineage;
- originating E-C-O™ Number.
Replay verifies the constitutional basis of exchanged intelligence without reproducing the originating AI execution.
9.13. Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks
Replay & TG-INTEL integrates with:
| Framework | Contribution |
|---|---|
| TG-INTEL | Constitutional intelligence |
| Validation Rule Registry | Validation provenance |
| Trust Model | Trust provenance |
| TrustGate Attestation Catalog | Assurance provenance |
| CIA | Constitutional identity |
| CIR | Identifier resolution |
| CALM | Lifecycle governance |
| CPA | Persistent intelligence storage |
| DAL | Integrity verification |
| CIL | Constitutional learning lifecycle |
| Replay Model | Replay orchestration |
Replay complements these frameworks without redefining them.
9.14. Constitutional Constraints
Replay & TG-INTEL shall satisfy the following requirements.
- Every TG-INTEL artifact shall possess a TIID.
- Every intelligence artifact shall reference replayable constitutional evidence.
- Replay shall never regenerate AI reasoning.
- Replay shall preserve constitutional provenance.
- Replay shall preserve intelligence lineage.
- Replay shall preserve trust dependencies.
- Replay shall remain deterministic.
- Intelligence shall remain constitutionally explainable.
These constraints are normative.
9.15. Constitutional Invariants
Replay & TG-INTEL preserves the following invariant families.
| Invariant Family | Constitutional Requirement |
|---|---|
| IF-100 | Identity preserved |
| IF-200 | Provenance preserved |
| IF-300 | Evidence lineage preserved |
| IF-400 | Trust dependencies preserved |
| IF-500 | Explainability preserved |
| IF-600 | Replay determinism preserved |
Violation of these invariants constitutes a constitutional replay failure.
9.16. Future Evolution
Future constitutional capabilities may extend Replay & TG-INTEL through:
- Constitutional Learning Models;
- adaptive execution profiles (XPID);
- explainable AI verification;
- constitutional reasoning engines;
- multi-ECO intelligence federation;
- Constitutional Replay Architecture (CRA);
- Constitutional Assurance Chain (CAC).
Future extensions shall preserve constitutional semantics.
9.17. Summary
Replay & TG-INTEL defines the constitutional relationship between deterministic replay and Constitutional Trust Intelligence.
By ensuring that every TG-INTEL artifact is identified by a Trust Intelligence Identifier (TIID) and references immutable Replay Packages, Replay Manifests, validation results (TG-VRES), evidence (VEVID), Trust Objects (TOIDs), Trust Vectors (TVIDs), TrustGate Attestations (TG-ATTEST), Distributed Assurance Ledger (DAL) anchors, and canonical identities governed by the Canonical Identity Architecture (CIA), Canonical Artifact Lifecycle Model (CALM), Canonical Persistence Architecture (CPA), Canonical Identifier Registry (CIR), and Constitutional Intelligence Lifecycle (CIL), the TrustGate platform guarantees that intelligence remains explainable, trustworthy, reproducible, and constitutionally grounded while allowing AI models and analytical methods to evolve independently.
Part 10 — Runtime Architecture
10.1. Purpose
The TrustGate Replay Runtime Architecture defines the constitutional runtime responsible for deterministic reconstruction, verification, and assurance of historical constitutional executions.
The Replay Runtime reconstructs constitutional artifacts without modifying them.
Its primary responsibility is to reproduce constitutional evidence, assurance, trust, and integrity with deterministic fidelity.
This specification is normative.
10.2. Constitutional Runtime Principles
The Replay Runtime shall satisfy the following constitutional principles.
Deterministic Execution
Equivalent replay inputs shall produce constitutionally equivalent outputs.
Stateless Processing
Replay executions shall be independent and reproducible.
Immutable Inputs
Replay shall never modify constitutional artifacts.
Explainability
Every replay decision shall remain independently explainable.
Modular Execution
Replay shall consist of independent constitutional micro-engines.
10.3. Canonical Replay Pipeline (CRP)
The Canonical Replay Pipeline (CRP) defines the normative execution sequence for replay operations.
Replay Request
│
▼
Replay Context Resolution
│
▼
Artifact Resolution
│
▼
Validation Replay
│
▼
Trust Replay
│
▼
Attestation Replay
│
▼
DAL Replay
│
▼
Federation Replay
│
▼
TG-INTEL Verification
│
▼
Replay Result
CRP reconstructs constitutional execution.
CEP performs constitutional execution.
10.4. Replay Runtime Layers
The Replay Runtime consists of constitutional runtime layers.
Replay APIs
│
Replay Orchestrator
│
Replay Context Manager
│
Canonical Replay Pipeline (CRP)
│
Replay Micro-Engines
│
Replay Artifact Registry
│
CPA Persistence
│
Distributed Assurance Ledger
Each layer has clearly defined constitutional responsibilities.
10.5. Replay Execution Profiles (XPID)
Replay behavior is governed by Execution Profiles (XPIDs).
Representative replay profiles include:
| XPID | Purpose |
|---|---|
| XP-LOCAL | Internal replay |
| XP-AUDIT | Independent audit replay |
| XP-REG | Regulatory replay |
| XP-FED | Federated replay |
| XP-FORENSIC | Deep forensic replay |
| XP-TEST | Validation and conformance testing |
Execution Profiles define replay policies without changing constitutional semantics.
10.6. Constitutional Replay Micro-Engines
Replay execution is performed by constitutional micro-engines.
| MEID | Constitutional Engine | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| TG-RP-001 | Replay Context Engine | Establish replay context |
| TG-RP-002 | Artifact Resolver | Resolve constitutional artifacts |
| TG-RP-003 | Validation Replay Engine | Replay validation |
| TG-RP-004 | Trust Replay Engine | Replay trust |
| TG-RP-005 | Attestation Replay Engine | Replay attestations |
| TG-RP-006 | DAL Replay Engine | Verify integrity and anchors |
| TG-RP-007 | Federation Replay Engine | Verify federated artifacts |
| TG-RP-008 | Intelligence Verification Engine | Verify TG-INTEL provenance |
| TG-RP-009 | Replay Result Engine | Produce replay outcome |
| TG-RP-010 | Replay Telemetry Engine | Emit replay telemetry |
Every Replay Micro-Engine shall possess a Canonical Managed Identifier (CMI) and a Micro-Engine Identifier (MEID).
10.7. Replay Orchestration
Replay execution is coordinated by the Replay Orchestrator.
Responsibilities include:
- execution sequencing;
- dependency resolution;
- artifact loading;
- XPID enforcement;
- policy enforcement;
- telemetry collection;
- error handling.
The Replay Orchestrator shall not perform constitutional verification itself.
10.8. Replay Context Manager
The Replay Context Manager establishes the immutable execution context.
Representative context includes:
- Replay Identifier;
- Replay Manifest;
- Replay Package;
- XPID;
- Replay policies;
- constitutional framework versions;
- federation profile;
- replay scope.
The replay context remains immutable throughout execution.
10.9. Replay Artifact Registry
Replay artifacts are resolved through the Replay Artifact Registry.
Representative artifact families include:
- TG-SIGNAL;
- TG-VRES;
- VEVID;
- TOID;
- TVID;
- TG-ATTEST;
- TIID;
- Replay Package;
- Replay Manifest;
- DAL references.
Artifacts shall be resolved through canonical identifiers.
10.10. Replay Telemetry
Replay Runtime emits constitutional telemetry.
Representative telemetry includes:
- Replay Identifier;
- XPID;
- MEID;
- execution chronology;
- artifact resolution;
- replay stage;
- verification outcome;
- execution duration.
Replay telemetry contributes to constitutional provenance.
10.11. Runtime Scalability
The Replay Runtime supports horizontal constitutional scaling.
Representative capabilities include:
- distributed execution;
- parallel artifact resolution;
- replay caching;
- stateless execution;
- federated replay nodes;
- replay scheduling.
Scalability shall not alter constitutional semantics.
10.12. Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks
Replay Runtime Architecture integrates with:
| Framework | Contribution |
|---|---|
| CEP | Original execution pipeline |
| CRP | Replay execution pipeline |
| CIA | Constitutional identity |
| CIR | Identifier resolution |
| CALM | Lifecycle governance |
| CPA | Persistence |
| DAL | Integrity verification |
| Trust Model | Trust reconstruction |
| TrustGate Attestation Catalog | Assurance reconstruction |
| TG-INTEL | Intelligence verification |
Replay Runtime complements these frameworks without redefining them.
10.13. Constitutional Constraints
The Replay Runtime shall satisfy the following requirements.
- Replay shall execute through the Canonical Replay Pipeline (CRP).
- Replay shall remain deterministic.
- Replay shall preserve constitutional identity.
- Replay shall preserve lineage.
- Replay shall preserve chronology.
- Replay shall remain independently explainable.
- Replay shall remain implementation independent.
- Replay shall never modify constitutional artifacts.
These constraints are normative.
10.14. Constitutional Invariants
The Replay Runtime preserves the following invariant families.
| Invariant Family | Constitutional Requirement |
|---|---|
| IF-100 | Identity preserved |
| IF-200 | Lineage preserved |
| IF-300 | Chronology preserved |
| IF-400 | Replay execution preserved |
| IF-500 | Artifact integrity preserved |
| IF-600 | Deterministic replay preserved |
Violation of these invariants constitutes a constitutional replay failure.
10.15. Future Evolution
Future constitutional capabilities may extend the Replay Runtime through:
- adaptive replay orchestration;
- distributed replay clusters;
- replay optimization;
- selective replay execution;
- Constitutional Replay Architecture (CRA);
- Constitutional Assurance Chain (CAC);
- autonomous replay scheduling.
Future extensions shall preserve constitutional semantics.
10.16. Summary
The TrustGate Replay Runtime Architecture defines the constitutional execution environment responsible for deterministic reconstruction and verification of historical constitutional executions.
By executing the Canonical Replay Pipeline (CRP) through governed replay micro-engines, immutable Replay Contexts, Execution Profiles (XPIDs), and replay orchestration under the Canonical Identity Architecture (CIA), Canonical Identifier Registry (CIR), Canonical Artifact Lifecycle Model (CALM), Canonical Persistence Architecture (CPA), Distributed Assurance Ledger (DAL), and TrustGate constitutional frameworks, the Replay Runtime guarantees that historical assurance remains reproducible, explainable, interoperable, and technology independent throughout the lifetime of the ZAYAZ platform.
Part 11 — Persistence, SQL & APIs (CPA)
11.1. Purpose
The Canonical Persistence Architecture (CPA) for TrustGate Replay defines the normative persistence model, relational architecture, APIs, and data contracts governing constitutional replay artifacts.
Replay persistence guarantees that every replay execution, artifact reference, verification outcome, and constitutional lineage remains reproducible, explainable, and independently verifiable throughout the lifetime of the ZAYAZ platform.
This specification is normative.
11.2. Constitutional Persistence Principles
Replay persistence shall satisfy the following principles.
Immutability
Replay artifacts shall never be modified after publication.
Canonical Identity
Every persisted replay artifact shall possess immutable constitutional identity.
Deterministic Reconstruction
Persisted replay artifacts shall support deterministic replay.
Explainability
Replay persistence shall preserve complete constitutional provenance.
Technology Independence
Persistence shall remain independent of database implementation.
11.3. Constitutional Persistence Model
Replay persistence is organized around immutable constitutional artifacts.
Replay Request
│
▼
Replay Context
│
▼
Replay Manifest
│
▼
Replay Package
│
▼
Replay Result
│
▼
Replay Telemetry
│
▼
Replay Archive
Each artifact is immutable and independently addressable.
11.4. Canonical Replay Entities
The Replay Runtime persists the following constitutional entities.
| Entity | Canonical Identifier | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Replay Execution | RPID | Individual replay execution |
| Replay Context | RCID | Immutable replay context |
| Replay Manifest | RMID | Governing replay contract |
| Replay Package | RPKID | Replay artifact collection |
| Replay Result | RRID | Replay verification outcome |
| Replay Session | RSID | Coordinated replay workflow |
| Replay Telemetry | RTID | Runtime telemetry |
| Replay Archive | RAID | Long-term replay preservation |
Every entity shall possess immutable constitutional identity.
11.5. Canonical SQL Model
Illustrative logical schema.
ReplayExecution
--------------------------
RPID (PK)
XPID
Status
StartedAt
CompletedAt
ReplayProfile
CreatedBy
ReplayContext
--------------------------
RCID (PK)
RPID (FK)
RMID
FrameworkVersions
FederationProfile
ReplayScope
ReplayManifest
--------------------------
RMID (PK)
ManifestHash
ManifestVersion
SigningPolicy
DALReference
ReplayPackage
--------------------------
RPKID (PK)
RPID (FK)
PackageHash
ArtifactCount
IntegrityStatus
ReplayResult
--------------------------
RRID (PK)
RPID (FK)
Outcome
VerificationLevel
ReplayDuration
ReplayTelemetry
--------------------------
RTID (PK)
RPID (FK)
MEID
XPID
Stage
Timestamp
Implementations may normalize or partition these entities provided constitutional semantics remain unchanged.
11.6. Constitutional Relationships
Replay entities participate in immutable constitutional relationships.
ReplayExecution
│
├────────► ReplayContext
│
├────────► ReplayManifest
│
├────────► ReplayPackage
│
├────────► ReplayResult
│
└────────► ReplayTelemetry
Relationships shall preserve constitutional lineage.
11.7. Artifact References
Replay artifacts reference constitutional objects rather than duplicating them.
Representative references include:
- CSI
- USO
- TG-SIGNAL
- TG-VRES
- VEVID
- TOID
- TVID
- TAID
- TIID
- DAL Anchor
- Federation Exchange
Replay persistence shall preserve references rather than replicate constitutional artifacts.
11.8. Constitutional Replay APIs
Replay functionality shall be exposed through canonical APIs.
Representative endpoints include:
| Endpoint | Purpose |
|---|---|
/replay/start | Start replay execution |
/replay/{rpid} | Retrieve replay execution |
/replay/{rpid}/context | Retrieve replay context |
/replay/{rpid}/manifest | Retrieve replay manifest |
/replay/{rpid}/package | Retrieve replay package |
/replay/{rpid}/result | Retrieve replay outcome |
/replay/{rpid}/telemetry | Retrieve replay telemetry |
/replay/search | Search replay executions |
/replay/archive | Access replay archives |
Implementations may expose additional APIs without altering constitutional semantics.
11.9. Constitutional API Contracts
Every Replay API response shall preserve constitutional identity.
Representative response metadata includes:
- RPID;
- XPID;
- RMID;
- RPKID;
- RRID;
- Replay Status;
- CALM lifecycle state;
- constitutional timestamps;
- originating E-C-O™ Number.
Replay APIs shall never expose implementation-specific identifiers as constitutional identities.
11.10. Persistence Lifecycle
Replay persistence follows CALM lifecycle governance.
Illustrative lifecycle:
Replay Created
│
▼
Executing
│
▼
Verified
│
▼
Published
│
▼
Federated
│
▼
Archived
Replay artifacts remain immutable throughout their lifecycle.
11.11. Persistence Profiles
Persistence behavior may vary according to XPID.
Representative profiles include:
| XPID | Persistence Behaviour |
|---|---|
| XP-LOCAL | Local persistence |
| XP-AUDIT | Extended audit retention |
| XP-REG | Regulatory retention |
| XP-FED | Federation persistence |
| XP-FORENSIC | Complete forensic archive |
Profiles alter operational behavior without changing constitutional semantics.
11.12. Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks
Replay Persistence integrates with:
| Framework | Contribution |
|---|---|
| CPA | Constitutional persistence |
| CIA | Identity governance |
| CIR | Identifier resolution |
| CALM | Lifecycle governance |
| DAL | Integrity verification |
| CEP | Original execution lineage |
| CRP | Replay execution lineage |
| TG-INTEL | Intelligence provenance |
| TrustGate Attestation Catalog | Assurance lineage |
Replay persistence complements these frameworks without redefining them.
11.13. Constitutional Constraints
Replay Persistence shall satisfy the following requirements.
- Every replay execution shall possess an RPID.
- Every Replay Manifest shall possess an RMID.
- Every Replay Package shall possess an RPKID.
- Every Replay Result shall possess an RRID.
- Every persisted relationship shall preserve constitutional lineage.
- Persistence shall remain immutable.
- Persistence shall remain deterministic.
- Persistence shall remain implementation independent.
These constraints are normative.
11.14. Constitutional Invariants
Replay Persistence preserves the following invariant families.
| Invariant Family | Constitutional Requirement |
|---|---|
| IF-100 | Identity preserved |
| IF-200 | Lineage preserved |
| IF-300 | Persistence preserved |
| IF-400 | Replay relationships preserved |
| IF-500 | Referential integrity preserved |
| IF-600 | Deterministic reconstruction preserved |
Violation of these invariants constitutes a constitutional persistence failure.
11.15. Future Evolution
Future constitutional capabilities may extend Replay Persistence through:
- distributed replay storage;
- immutable object persistence;
- decentralized archive services;
- semantic replay indexing;
- Constitutional Replay Architecture (CRA);
- Constitutional Assurance Chain (CAC);
- AI-assisted replay discovery.
Future extensions shall preserve constitutional semantics.
11.16. Summary
The Canonical Persistence Architecture (CPA) for TrustGate Replay defines the constitutional persistence model governing Replay Executions (RPIDs), Replay Contexts (RCIDs), Replay Manifests (RMIDs), Replay Packages (RPKIDs), Replay Results (RRIDs), Replay Sessions (RSIDs), Replay Telemetry (RTIDs), and Replay Archives (RAIDs).
By preserving immutable constitutional identities, artifact references, lifecycle governance through CALM, identifier resolution through CIR, integrity through DAL, and deterministic reconstruction through the Canonical Replay Pipeline (CRP), Replay Persistence guarantees that every replay execution remains reproducible, explainable, interoperable, and independently verifiable throughout the lifetime of the ZAYAZ platform.
Part 12 — Conformance & Reference Invariants
12.1. Purpose
This chapter defines the constitutional conformance requirements, replay equivalence rules, and invariant families governing all implementations of the TrustGate Replay Specification.
Its purpose is to guarantee that replay executions remain deterministic, reproducible, interoperable, and independently verifiable across implementations, organizations, jurisdictions, and federated ecosystems.
This specification is normative.
12.2. Constitutional Conformance Principles
Every TrustGate Replay implementation shall satisfy the following principles.
Determinism
Equivalent replay inputs shall produce constitutionally equivalent replay outputs.
Constitutional Identity
Every replay artifact shall preserve immutable constitutional identity.
Replay Equivalence
Independent implementations shall produce constitutionally equivalent replay results.
Technology Independence
Replay conformance shall not depend upon programming language, operating system, cloud provider, database, or deployment architecture.
Explainability
Every replay result shall remain independently explainable.
12.3. Replay Conformance Levels
Replay implementations shall declare one of the following conformance levels.
| Level | Designation | Constitutional Scope |
|---|---|---|
| TG-RC1 | Basic Replay | Deterministic replay of constitutional artifacts |
| TG-RC2 | Assured Replay | Validation, Trust, and Attestation replay |
| TG-RC3 | Federated Replay | Cross-ECO replay interoperability |
| TG-RC4 | Constitutional Replay | Full replay, DAL verification, TG-INTEL verification, CPA, CIA, CALM, CIR, and CRP compliance |
Higher levels include all lower-level requirements.
12.4. Canonical Replay Equivalence (CRE)
Canonical Replay Equivalence (CRE) defines when two replay executions are constitutionally equivalent.
Replay executions are constitutionally equivalent when they produce equivalent:
- constitutional identities;
- replay lineage;
- replay chronology;
- validation outcomes;
- trust outcomes;
- attestation outcomes;
- integrity verification;
- replay outcomes.
Implementation details are explicitly excluded from equivalence determination.
12.5. Constitutional Replay Equivalence Model
Replay Execution A
│
▼
Replay Result A
│
│
========== CRE ==========
│
│
Replay Result B
▲
│
Replay Execution B
Replay equivalence evaluates constitutional semantics rather than implementation behavior.
12.6. Mandatory Conformance Requirements
Every conforming implementation shall:
- implement the Canonical Replay Pipeline (CRP);
- preserve canonical identifiers;
- preserve replay determinism;
- preserve replay provenance;
- preserve replay chronology;
- preserve constitutional lineage;
- support Replay Packages and Replay Manifests;
- support replay telemetry;
- preserve CALM lifecycle states.
These requirements are normative.
12.7. Optional Capabilities
Replay implementations may additionally support:
- distributed replay clusters;
- federation replay;
- selective replay;
- replay optimization;
- adaptive execution profiles (XPID);
- replay caching;
- semantic replay search;
- TG-INTEL verification.
Optional capabilities shall not alter constitutional semantics.
12.8. Reference Invariant Families
Replay implementations shall preserve the following invariant families.
| Invariant | Constitutional Requirement |
|---|---|
| IF-100 | Identity Preservation |
| IF-200 | Lineage Preservation |
| IF-300 | Replay Determinism |
| IF-400 | Referential Integrity |
| IF-500 | Chronological Consistency |
| IF-600 | Replay Equivalence |
| IF-700 | Trust Continuity |
| IF-800 | Attestation Continuity |
| IF-900 | Integrity Preservation |
| IF-1000 | Explainability Preservation |
Violation of any invariant constitutes constitutional non-conformance.
12.9. Constitutional Verification Checklist
A conforming Replay Runtime shall verify:
✓ Replay Context
✓ Replay Manifest
✓ Replay Package
✓ Validation Replay
✓ Trust Replay
✓ Attestation Replay
✓ DAL Replay
✓ Federation Replay (when applicable)
✓ TG-INTEL provenance
✓ Replay Result
✓ Replay Telemetry
✓ CALM lifecycle consistency
✓ Canonical identifiers
12.10. Constitutional Framework Compliance
Replay implementations shall comply with the following constitutional frameworks.
| Framework | Required |
|---|---|
| CIA | ✓ |
| CIR | ✓ |
| CALM | ✓ |
| CPA | ✓ |
| CEP | ✓ (lineage only) |
| CRP | ✓ |
| DAL | ✓ |
| Validation Rule Registry | ✓ |
| Trust Model | ✓ |
| TrustGate Attestation Catalog | ✓ |
| TG-INTEL | Recommended |
| TrustGate Federation Profiles | Required for TG-RC3 and TG-RC4 |
12.11. Constitutional Certification
Replay implementations may undergo constitutional certification.
Certification evaluates:
- replay determinism;
- replay equivalence (CRE);
- invariant preservation;
- identifier compliance;
- constitutional lineage;
- interoperability;
- federation compatibility;
- explainability.
Certification results shall themselves be replayable constitutional artifacts.
12.12. Future Evolution
Future constitutional capabilities may extend replay conformance through:
- Constitutional Replay Architecture (CRA);
- Constitutional Assurance Chain (CAC);
- post-quantum replay verification;
- zero-knowledge replay verification;
- autonomous replay certification;
- distributed constitutional verification services.
Future extensions shall preserve constitutional semantics.
12.13. Summary
The TrustGate Replay Conformance Model defines the constitutional contract governing deterministic replay across the ZAYAZ platform.
By requiring compliance with the Canonical Replay Pipeline (CRP), Canonical Replay Equivalence (CRE), Canonical Identity Architecture (CIA), Canonical Identifier Registry (CIR), Canonical Artifact Lifecycle Model (CALM), Canonical Persistence Architecture (CPA), Distributed Assurance Ledger (DAL), the Validation Rule Registry, Trust Model, TrustGate Attestation Catalog, and the TrustGate Federation Profiles, the platform guarantees that replay remains deterministic, explainable, interoperable, independently verifiable, and constitutionally equivalent across all compliant implementations.