Skip to main content
Jira progress: loading…

TG-MIB

TrustGate Management Information Base

1. Purpose​

TrustGate (TG) is the primary assurance gateway of the ZAYAZ platform.

The TrustGate Management Information Base (MIB) defines the operational runtime behavior, interfaces, APIs, event contracts, processing pipeline, storage models, governance controls, and integration specifications required for implementation and operation of TrustGate across the ZAYAZ ecosystem.

While the TrustGate architectural specification describes the purpose and role of TrustGate within the broader assurance architecture, this document serves as the implementation blueprint for engineers, platform operators, assurance teams, auditors, and integration developers.

The MIB establishes the canonical operational specification for:

  • Signal ingestion
  • Trust evaluation
  • Trust scoring
  • Quarantine handling
  • Assurance evidence generation
  • Replay support
  • DAL anchoring
  • Federation exchange
  • DSAIL learning feedback
  • AII contribution

TrustGate operates as the first assurance decision point within ZAYAZ and is responsible for preventing low-confidence information from entering downstream sustainability calculations, reporting pipelines, and regulatory disclosures.


2. Scope​

TrustGate evaluates all inbound assurance-relevant signals entering the ZAYAZ ecosystem.

Supported signal classes include:

Signal CategoryExamples
Financial SignalsAP invoices, purchase orders, ERP transactions
Product SignalsCarbon Passports, DPP records, EPCIS events
Environmental SignalsMeter readings, sensor streams, utility consumption
Supplier SignalsESG questionnaires, declarations, attestations
Verification SignalsAuditor evidence, replay outcomes
Federation SignalsAFLE trust attestations, federation updates
Governance SignalsPolicy acknowledgements, certification records
AI SignalsDSAIL recommendations, anomaly detections

All supported signal types ultimately produce trust artifacts suitable for:

  • DAL anchoring
  • OARM replay
  • AII scoring
  • AFLE federation exchange
  • Carbon Passport generation
  • Regulatory disclosures

3. Position Within the Assurance Architecture​

3.1 Assurance Flow​

Input Hub
│
▼

TrustGate
│
▼

ZSSR
│
▼

Domain Engines
│
▼

DAL
│
▼

DSAIL
│
▼

AII

TrustGate performs the initial trust evaluation before any signal enters the assurance processing chain.

3.2 Upstream Dependencies​

ComponentPurpose
Input HubSignal ingestion
SSSRSchema validation
ZARComponent validation
ECO RegistryIdentity verification
EGFSFederation lookup
AFLEExternal attestations

3.3 Downstream Consumers​

ComponentPurpose
ZSSRRouting decisions
DALAssurance anchoring
OARMReplay validation
DSAILLearning feedback
AIITrust intelligence scoring
Carbon Passport EngineProduct assurance
EIFExternal interoperability

4. Core Responsibilities​

TrustGate performs six primary operational functions.

4.1 Signal Validation​

Validation of:

  • Structure
  • Schema compliance
  • Data completeness
  • Referential integrity
  • Identity integrity

4.2 Trust Evaluation​

Computation of confidence metrics based on:

  • Provenance
  • Quality
  • Consistency
  • Federation verification
  • Historical performance

4.3 Assurance Evidence Generation​

Creation of:

  • Trust artifacts
  • Replay artifacts
  • DAL anchors
  • Verification metadata

4.4 Quarantine Management​

Isolation of:

  • Low-trust records
  • Failed validations
  • Suspicious patterns
  • Federated conflicts

4.5 Federation Assurance​

Validation of:

  • AFLE attestations
  • Carbon Passports
  • Federated trust evidence
  • Cross-ECO exchanges

4.6 Learning Feedback​

Publishing assurance outcomes to DSAIL for continuous model improvement.


5. Runtime Architecture​

5.1. TrustGate Processing Pipeline​

TrustGate operates as a deterministic assurance gateway.

Every inbound signal passes through a fixed processing sequence before being accepted, routed, quarantined, or escalated.

The canonical TrustGate runtime order is:

Signal Ingestion
│
▼
Parser
│
▼
Structure Validation
│
▼
Normalizer
│
▼
Enrichment
│
▼
Rule Evaluation
│
▼
Policy Resolution
│
▼
Trust Scoring
│
▼
Decision Engine
│
├── ACCEPT
├── ROUTE
├── ESCALATE
├── QUARANTINE
└── REJECT
│
▼
DAL Anchoring
│
▼
Event Publication

Structure Validation occurs before normalization and verifies that the parsed payload is admissible, structurally coherent, and safe to normalize.

Rule Evaluation occurs after enrichment and evaluates governed validation rules against the normalized and enriched canonical signal.

Policy Resolution occurs before Trust Scoring because Trust Scoring consumes POLICY-CONTEXT as a mandatory input.

Implementations SHALL NOT execute Trust Scoring before Policy Resolution.


5.2. Runtime Components​

ComponentResponsibility
Signal ParserParses inbound payloads into canonical runtime objects
Structure ValidatorPerforms pre-normalization structural validation
Signal NormalizerNormalizes identifiers, units, timestamps, schemas, and payload shape
Identity ResolverVerifies ECO Number, USO, CSI, and relevant identity references
Evidence EnricherAdds contextual metadata, provenance, federation references, and evidence links
Rule Evaluation EngineExecutes governed validation rules against normalized and enriched signals
Policy Resolution EngineResolves POLICY-CONTEXT, thresholds, regulatory constraints, federation constraints, and tenant policies
Trust Scoring EngineCalculates trust using resolved POLICY-CONTEXT and constitutional evidence
Decision EngineSelects ACCEPT, ROUTE, ESCALATE, QUARANTINE, or REJECT
Event PublisherPublishes runtime, trust, replay, and federation events
DAL ConnectorPerforms assurance anchoring
Replay ConnectorRegisters replay artifacts and OARM references
Federation ConnectorHandles AFLE and federation interactions

5.3. Processing Guarantees​

TrustGate guarantees:

  • Deterministic execution
  • Idempotent processing
  • Replay reproducibility
  • Cryptographic auditability
  • DAL anchoring
  • USO traceability

Every accepted signal SHALL produce:

  • USO lineage reference
  • Trust evaluation record
  • Replay artifact
  • DAL anchor reference

6. Trust Evaluation Engine​

6.1. Purpose​

The Trust Evaluation Engine computes the confidence level associated with a signal.

The Trust Evaluation Engine SHALL execute only after Policy Resolution has produced a resolved POLICY-CONTEXT.

Trust scores are represented as:

0≤T≤10 \leq T \leq 1

where:

  • 0 = completely untrusted
  • 1 = fully trusted

6.2. Trust Inputs​

CategoryExample
Source TrustHistorical supplier trust
Identity TrustECO verification status
Structure QualityPre-normalization structure validation
Data CompletenessMissing field analysis
Rule EvaluationGoverned validation rule outcomes
Policy ContextResolved POLICY-CONTEXT
Historical AccuracyPrevious replay outcomes
Federation ValidationAFLE verification
DAL VerificationLedger proof validation
AI RecommendationsDSAIL modifiers

6.3. Composite Trust Formula​

The default TrustGate trust score is calculated as:

T=wsS+wiI+wqQ+wrR+wpP+whH+wfF+wdDT = w_sS + w_iI + w_qQ + w_rR + w_pP + w_hH + w_fF + w_dD

Where:

VariableDescription
SSSource trust
IIIdentity confidence
QQData quality
RRRule evaluation quality
PPResolved policy context
HHHistorical reliability
FFFederation validation
DDDAL verification confidence

and

∑w=1\sum w = 1

6.4. Confidence Interval​

TrustGate stores confidence separately from trust score.

CI=1−σ(T)CI = 1 - \sigma(T)

Where:

  • σ\sigma = observed trust variance

Low confidence may trigger escalation despite a high trust score.


6.5. Trust Classification​

RangeClassification
0.95 – 1.00Verified
0.85 – 0.95Trusted
0.70 – 0.85Conditional
0.50 – 0.70Review Required
< 0.50Quarantine

7. Decision Engine​

7.1. Decision Logic​

TrustGate evaluates trust score, confidence, resolved policy context, and federation constraints.

The Decision Engine consumes the Trust Score produced after Policy Resolution. It does not resolve scoring policy retroactively.

Possible outcomes:

OutcomeDescription
ACCEPTSignal accepted
ROUTERouted to next processor
ESCALATEHuman review required
QUARANTINESignal isolated
REJECTSignal discarded

7.2. Decision Formula​

Decision=f(T,CI,P,R)Decision = f(T,CI,P,R)

Where:

VariableMeaning
TTTrust Score
CICIConfidence Interval
PPResolved policy context
RRRegulatory Constraints

7.3. Example Decision​

decision-engine-example.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"trust_score": 0.91,
"confidence": 0.94,
"policy_passed": true,
"decision": "ACCEPT"
}

8. Input Contracts​

8.1. Canonical Input Structure​

All TrustGate inputs SHALL conform to the following envelope.

trustgate-envelope.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"event_id": "EVT-2026-001245",
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"signal_type": "invoice",
"source_system": "SAP",
"payload": {},
"received_at": "2026-01-15T18:30:00Z"
}

8.2. Required Fields​

FieldRequired
event_idYes
eco_numberYes
signal_typeYes
payloadYes
received_atYes

8.3. Identity Verification​

TrustGate SHALL verify:

trustgate-id-verify.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"did": "did:zayaz:ECO-A123",
"status": "verified"
}

using:

  • ECO Registry
  • EGFS Federation Registry
  • DAL Anchors

before processing continues.


9. Output Contracts​

9.1. Trust Assessment Record​

trust-assessment-record.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"confidence": 0.94,
"classification": "trusted",
"decision": "ACCEPT",
"created_at": "2026-01-15T18:30:00Z"
}

9.2. Replay Artifact​

replay-artifact.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"replay_id": "RPL-2026-001245",
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"replayable": true,
"uso_id": "01JBF0W8S9Q0R1S2T3U4V5W6X"
}

9.3. DAL Reference​

dal-reference.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"dal_ref": {
"ledger_id": "DAL-2026-001245",
"root_hash": "2dcb5a18f3d55b1f0a3a...",
"verified": true
}
}

10. Trust Events​

10.1. Event Publication​

TrustGate emits assurance events for downstream systems.

Topic:

trustgate.events.v1

10.2. Trust Event Schema​

trust-event-schema.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"event_type": "trust.evaluated",
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"confidence": 0.94,
"decision": "ACCEPT",
"timestamp": "2026-01-15T18:30:00Z"
}

10.3. Quarantine Event​

quarantine-event.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"event_type": "trust.quarantine",
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001246",
"eco_number": "ECO-B456",
"trust_score": 0.41,
"reason": "identity_conflict",
"timestamp": "2026-01-15T18:32:00Z"
}

10.4. Replay Event​

replay-event.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"event_type": "trust.replay.created",
"replay_id": "RPL-2026-001245",
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"uso_id": "01JBF0W8S9Q0R1S2T3U4V5W6X"
}

10.5. DSAIL Learning Event​

dsail-learning-event.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"event_type": "trust.learning.feedback",
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"verified_score": 0.88,
"delta": -0.03,
"model_cmi": "DSAIL.TrustLearner.Model.Core.2_1_0"
}

11. API Specification​

11.1. Overview​

TrustGate exposes REST and gRPC interfaces for:

  • Signal ingestion
  • Trust assessment
  • Replay retrieval
  • DAL verification
  • Federation validation
  • Administrative operations
  • Health monitoring

All APIs SHALL be versioned.

Example:

/api/v1/trustgate/*


11.2. Signal Submission API​

Endpoint

POST /api/v1/trustgate/signals

Request

signal-submission-api-request.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"signal_type": "invoice",
"payload": {
"invoice_number": "INV-2026-001",
"amount": 2500.00,
"currency": "EUR"
}
}

Response

signal-submission-api-response.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"status": "accepted",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"confidence": 0.94,
"decision": "ACCEPT"
}

11.3. Assessment Lookup API​

Endpoint

GET /api/v1/trustgate/assessments/{assessment_id}

Response

assessment-lookup-api-response.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"confidence": 0.94,
"classification": "trusted",
"decision": "ACCEPT",
"dal_ref": "DAL-2026-001245"
}

11.4. Replay API​

Endpoint

POST /api/v1/trustgate/replay/{assessment_id}

Response

replay-api-response.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"replay_id": "RPL-2026-001245",
"status": "queued",
"estimated_completion_seconds": 15
}

12. OARM Integration​

12.1. Purpose​

TrustGate SHALL integrate with the Operational Assurance and Replay Mechanisms (OARM) framework.

Every trust assessment SHALL be reproducible.


12.2. Replay Artifact Generation​

Each TrustGate decision SHALL generate:

replay-artifact-generation.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"replay_id": "RPL-2026-001245",
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"uso_id": "01JBF0W8S9Q0R1S2T3U4V5W6X",
"input_hash": "f912cb...",
"configuration_hash": "ab62fd...",
"model_hash": "c9af31...",
"replayable": true
}

12.3. Replay Verification Formula​

Replay integrity is evaluated as:

RI=Successful ReplaysTotal Replay AttemptsRI = \frac{Successful\ Replays}{Total\ Replay\ Attempts}

Where:

  • RIRI = Replay Integrity

Expected value:

RI≥0.99RI \ge 0.99

12.4. Replay Event​

qarm-replay-event.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"event_type": "trustgate.replay.completed",
"replay_id": "RPL-2026-001245",
"result": "PASS",
"timestamp": "2026-01-15T18:42:00Z"
}

13. DAL Integration​

13.1. Purpose​

TrustGate SHALL anchor all finalized assessments into DAL.

This guarantees:

  • Immutability
  • Non-repudiation
  • Auditability
  • Cross-ECO verification

13.2. DAL Submission Record​

dal-submission-record.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"decision": "ACCEPT",
"hash": "3bfa2ec9d2f...",
"submitted_at": "2026-01-15T18:30:00Z"
}

13.3. DAL Verification Response​

dal-verification-response.jsonGitHub ↗
{
"ledger_id": "DAL-2026-001245",
"root_hash": "2dcb5a18f3d55b1f0a3a...",
"verified": true
}

13.4. Merkle Verification​

Verification SHALL use Merkle inclusion proofs.

Example:

{
"proof": {
"leaf_hash": "3bfa2e...",
"root_hash": "2dcb5a18f3d55b1f0a3a...",
"verified": true
}
}

14. AFLE Integration​

14.1. Purpose​

TrustGate SHALL support federation-wide trust exchange through AFLE.

Trust assessments may be shared between ECO entities.


14.2. Trust Attestation​

{
"attestation_id": "ATT-2026-00877",
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"trust_score": 0.93,
"confidence": 0.91,
"dal_ref": "DAL-2026-001245"
}

14.3. Federated Verification​

TrustGate SHALL validate:

  • Signature validity
  • DAL anchors
  • ECO identity
  • Trust freshness
  • Policy compliance

before federated trust can be consumed.


15. Carbon Passport Integration​

15.1. Purpose​

TrustGate SHALL act as the assurance gateway for Carbon Passport generation.


15.2. Supported Passport Artifacts​

ArtifactPurpose
Carbon PassportProduct assurance
Product Carbon FootprintEmissions transparency
DPP RecordProduct compliance
Supplier AttestationSupply-chain verification
Lifecycle CalculationSustainability evidence

15.3. Passport Trust Reference​

{
"passport_id": "CP-2026-00087",
"trust_assessment": "TG-2026-001245",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"verified": true
}

16. DSAIL Integration​

16.1. Purpose​

TrustGate continuously feeds assurance outcomes into DSAIL.

This enables:

  • Trust calibration
  • Anomaly detection
  • Confidence tuning
  • Routing optimization

16.2. Learning Feedback Record​

{
"event_type": "trust.learning.feedback",
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"verified_score": 0.88,
"delta": -0.03,
"model_cmi": "DSAIL.TrustLearner.Model.Core.2_1_0"
}

16.3. Trust Drift Formula​

TD=Tverified−TpredictedTD = T_{verified} - T_{predicted}

Where:

  • TDTD = Trust Drift

Large drift values indicate model recalibration needs.


16.4. Model Feedback Frequency​

Event TypeFrequency
Trust EvaluationsContinuous
Replay OutcomesContinuous
DAL VerificationsDaily
Audit ResultsContinuous
Federated Trust UpdatesDaily

17. AII Integration​

17.1. Purpose​

TrustGate contributes assurance telemetry to the Assurance Intelligence Index (AII).


17.2. AII Metrics Produced​

MetricDescription
Trust AccuracyPredicted vs verified
Replay SuccessOARM outcomes
Verification EfficiencyCost vs verification
Assurance ResilienceTrust stability
IntegrityDAL validation

17.3. Contribution Payload​

{
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"assessment_count": 12045,
"avg_trust": 0.91,
"trust_variance": 0.03,
"replay_success_rate": 0.997,
"dal_verification_rate": 1.0
}

18. Federation Integration​

18.1. EGFS Participation​

TrustGate participates in:

  • Federation identity validation
  • Trust synchronization
  • Assurance exchange
  • Carbon Passport verification

18.2. Federation Message​

{
"federation_id": "FED-2026-00077",
"source_eco": "ECO-A123",
"target_eco": "ECO-B456",
"payload_type": "trust_attestation",
"payload_hash": "f91c35b6f21c...",
"timestamp": "2026-01-15T18:30:00Z",
"verified": true
}

18.3. Trust Freshness Formula​

Trust assertions become stale over time.

TF=e−λΔtTF = e^{-\lambda \Delta t}

Where:

  • TFTF = Trust Freshness
  • λ\lambda = decay coefficient
  • Δt\Delta t = elapsed time

Federated trust exchanges SHALL include freshness metadata.


19. Data Model​

19.1. Trust Assessment Entity​

{
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"signal_type": "invoice",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"confidence": 0.94,
"decision": "ACCEPT",
"dal_ref": "DAL-2026-001245",
"created_at": "2026-01-15T18:30:00Z"
}

19.2. Trust Assessment Fields​

FieldType
assessment_idUUID
eco_numberString
signal_typeString
trust_scoreDecimal
confidenceDecimal
decisionEnum
dal_refString
created_atTimestamp

20. Storage Schema​

20.1. trust_assessments​

CREATE TABLE trust_assessments (
assessment_id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
eco_number TEXT NOT NULL,
signal_type TEXT NOT NULL,
trust_score NUMERIC(5,4),
confidence NUMERIC(5,4),
decision TEXT,
dal_ref TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMP
);

20.2. replay_artifacts​

CREATE TABLE replay_artifacts (
replay_id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
assessment_id UUID,
uso_id TEXT,
replay_status TEXT,
created_at TIMESTAMP
);

20.3. trust_events​

CREATE TABLE trust_events (
event_id UUID PRIMARY KEY,
event_type TEXT,
payload JSONB,
created_at TIMESTAMP
);

21. Security Architecture​

21.1. Purpose​

TrustGate operates as the first assurance boundary within the ZAYAZ ecosystem and therefore constitutes a critical security component.

All incoming signals, trust evaluations, replay operations, assurance attestations, and federation exchanges SHALL pass through cryptographically verifiable security controls.

TrustGate security architecture is built upon:

  • Zero Trust principles
  • Defense-in-depth
  • Cryptographic verifiability
  • Replayability
  • Federation-aware identity management
  • Continuous assurance monitoring

21.2. Security Domains​

DomainPurpose
Signal SecurityProtect incoming data integrity
Identity SecurityVerify actors and systems
Trust SecurityProtect scoring and decisions
Replay SecurityEnsure deterministic re-execution
Ledger SecurityPrevent historical tampering
Federation SecuritySecure Cross-ECO exchanges
AI SecurityGovern DSAIL-assisted decisions

21.3. Trust Boundary Architecture​

External Sources
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ Parser │
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ Structure Validation│
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ Normalization │
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ Enrichment │
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ Rule Evaluation │
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ Policy Resolution │
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ Trust Scoring │
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ Decision │
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────┐
│ DAL Anchoring │
└─────────┬──────────┘
│
▼
Federation / Internal Systems

No signal may bypass TrustGate evaluation.


22. Cryptographic Requirements​

22.1. Approved Algorithms​

FunctionAlgorithm
HashingSHA-256
SignaturesEd25519
Federation CertificatesX.509
Key ExchangeECDH
Merkle TreesSHA-256
Storage EncryptionAES-256-GCM
Transport EncryptionTLS 1.3

22.2. Hash Generation​

TrustGate SHALL generate hashes for:

  • Incoming payloads
  • Replay artifacts
  • Assessment results
  • Trust attestations
  • Federation messages

Example:

{
"hash_algorithm": "SHA-256",
"payload_hash": "f91c35b6f21c..."
}

22.3. Signature Verification​

Every federated artifact SHALL be validated.

{
"signature": {
"algorithm": "Ed25519",
"verification_method": "did:zayaz:ECO-A123#trustgate-key",
"verified": true
}
}

22.4. Merkle Integrity Validation​

TrustGate SHALL validate DAL inclusion proofs.

Example:

{
"proof": {
"leaf_hash": "3bfa2e...",
"root_hash": "2dcb5a18f3d55b1f0a3a...",
"verified": true
}
}

23. Identity & Access Control​

23.1. Identity Sources​

TrustGate supports:

Identity TypeExample
Userauditor@company.com
Service Accounttg-router-service
ECO IdentityECO-A123
Federation Nodedid:zayaz:ECO-A123
RegulatorEU-CSRD
VerifierSGS-EU

23.2. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)​

RolePermissions
OperatorView assessments
ReviewerManual trust review
AuditorReplay verification
AdministratorConfiguration management
Federation NodeTrust exchange
RegulatorRead-only assurance access

23.3. Attribute-Based Controls (ABAC)​

Additional controls include:

  • Region
  • ECO ownership
  • Reporting period
  • Data classification
  • Federation policy level

23.4. Example Access Policy​

{
"role": "auditor",
"resource": "trust_assessment",
"actions": [
"read",
"replay"
]
}

24. Runtime Configuration​

24.1. Trust Threshold Configuration​

trustgate:
thresholds:
accept: 0.85
review: 0.70
quarantine: 0.50

24.2. Confidence Thresholds​

trustgate:
confidence:
minimum: 0.80
warning: 0.60

24.3. Replay Policies​

replay:
retention_days: 3650
mandatory_for:
- carbon_passports
- assurance_reports
- ai_adjustments

24.4. DAL Policies​

dal:
anchoring_interval_minutes: 60
merkle_batch_size: 50000
verify_before_publish: true

24.5. Federation Policies​

federation:
trust_freshness_days: 90
require_dal_validation: true
require_signature_validation: true

25. Monitoring & Observability​

25.1. Overview​

TrustGate SHALL expose operational telemetry via:

  • OpenTelemetry
  • Prometheus
  • Grafana
  • VIZZ
  • DAL Metrics APIs

25.2. Core Metrics​

MetricDescription
assessments_totalTotal evaluations
accepted_totalAccepted signals
review_totalManual review cases
quarantined_totalRejected signals
replay_success_rateReplay integrity
dal_anchor_success_rateDAL success
trust_driftAI deviation
federation_exchangesCross-ECO volume

25.3. Prometheus Example​

trustgate_assessments_total 12345678
trustgate_avg_score 0.91
trustgate_replay_success_rate 0.998

25.4. Health Endpoint​

GET /api/v1/trustgate/health

Response:

{
"status": "healthy",
"version": "2.1.0",
"dal_connected": true,
"federation_connected": true
}

26. VIZZ Dashboards​

26.1. Operational Dashboard​

Displays:

  • Trust scores
  • Acceptance rates
  • Manual review backlog
  • Quarantine trends

26.2. Assurance Dashboard​

Displays:

  • Replay outcomes
  • DAL verification status
  • Trust drift
  • Audit findings

26.3. Federation Dashboard​

Displays:

  • Cross-ECO exchanges
  • Attestation validation
  • Carbon Passport verification
  • Federation node health

26.4. AI Dashboard​

Displays:

  • Model confidence
  • Trust evolution
  • DSAIL recommendations
  • AII contribution metrics

27. Performance & Scalability​

27.1. Design Targets​

MetricTarget.
Assessment Latency< 200 ms
Replay Creation< 5 sec
DAL Submission< 1 min
Federation Validation< 2 sec
Availability99.95%

27.2. Throughput Targets​

WorkloadTarget
Invoice Processing50,000/min
Sensor Signals1,000,000/min
Federation Messages100,000/day
Replay Requests10,000/day

27.3. Horizontal Scaling​

TrustGate SHALL support:

  • Kubernetes deployment
  • Stateless processing
  • Distributed caching
  • Multi-region deployment
  • Federation-aware failover

27.4. Multi-Tenant Isolation​

Isolation SHALL occur at:

  • Database layer
  • Cache layer
  • Queue layer
  • Replay layer
  • Federation layer

28. Operational Runbooks​

28.1. Replay Failure​

Trigger:

Replay Result != Original Result

Actions:

  1. Generate replay incident.
  2. Freeze affected assessments.
  3. Notify assurance team.
  4. Initiate forensic replay.

28.2. DAL Failure​

Trigger:

DAL Anchor Verification Failed

Actions:

  1. Suspend publication.
  2. Recompute Merkle tree.
  3. Re-submit anchor.
  4. Notify administrators.

28.3. Trust Drift Incident​

Trigger:

∣Tverified−Tpredicted∣>0.15|T_{verified} - T_{predicted}| > 0.15

Actions:

  1. Flag DSAIL model.
  2. Increase sampling rate.
  3. Schedule assurance review.

28.4. Federation Incident​

Trigger:

Cross-ECO Verification Failure

Actions:

  1. Quarantine federation payload.
  2. Validate DID.
  3. Validate DAL proof.
  4. Notify source ECO.

29. End-to-End Example — AP Invoice​

29.1. Flow​

Invoice
↓
TrustGate
↓
Trust Score = 0.91
↓
DAL Anchor
↓
AII Update
↓
Carbon Passport

29.2. Assessment Record​

{
"assessment_id": "TG-2026-001245",
"eco_number": "ECO-A123",
"signal_type": "invoice",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"confidence": 0.94,
"decision": "ACCEPT"
}

30. End-to-End Example — Carbon Passport​

30.1. Flow​

Emission Data
↓
TrustGate
↓
Replay Artifact
↓
DAL Anchor
↓
AFLE Attestation
↓
Carbon Passport

30.2. Trust Reference​

{
"passport_id": "CP-2026-00087",
"trust_assessment": "TG-2026-001245",
"trust_score": 0.91,
"verified": true
}

31. End-to-End Example — Federated Exchange​

31.1. Flow​

ECO-A123
↓
Trust Attestation
↓
AFLE
↓
ECO-B456
↓
Trust Validation

31.2. Federation Message​

{
"federation_id": "FED-2026-00077",
"source_eco": "ECO-A123",
"target_eco": "ECO-B456",
"payload_type": "trust_attestation",
"verified": true
}

32. Governance & Compliance​

32.1. Applicable Frameworks​

FrameworkCoverage
CSRDAssurance evidence
ESRSDisclosure validation
ISO 14064-1GHG verification
ISO 27001Security controls
EU AI ActAI governance
GHG ProtocolEmissions assurance

32.2. Governance Integration​

TrustGate SHALL integrate with:

  • OARM
  • DAL
  • AFLE
  • DSAIL
  • AII
  • FAGF
  • EGFS

32.3. Assurance Requirements​

Every TrustGate decision SHALL be:

  • Traceable
  • Replayable
  • Explainable
  • Cryptographically verifiable
  • DAL anchored
  • Federated when applicable

33. References​

SpecificationID
End-to-End Traceability FrameworkTRACE
Operational Assurance & ReplayOARM
Cross-ECO Assurance & FederationAFLE
Digital Assurance LedgerDAL
AI-Assisted Assurance & Trust IntelligenceAIATI
Assurance Intelligence IndexAII
Federated Assurance Governance FrameworkFAGF
Global Federation StackEGFS

33.2. Appendix References​

  • TrustGate Scoring Rubric (MICE)
  • TrustGate Micro-Engine Catalog
  • TrustGate Validation Rule Registry
  • TrustGate CSI Catalog
  • TrustGate Replay Specification
  • TrustGate Federation Profiles



GitHub RepoRequest for Change (RFC)