Jira progress: loading…

TG-MICE-3

TrustGate Micro Engine Catalog - Appendicies

APPENDIX A — Canonical Identifier Reference

A.1. Purpose

This appendix defines the canonical identifiers used throughout the TrustGate Micro Engine Catalog.

Canonical identifiers establish immutable identity for constitutional entities, runtime executions, governed artifacts, and analytical intelligence.

Identifiers are governed by the Canonical Identity Architecture (CIA) and remain stable throughout their lifecycle.

A.2. Constitutional Principles

Canonical identifiers shall satisfy the following principles.

Globally unique.
Immutable after assignment.
Technology independent.
Replay compatible.
Federation compatible.
Human readable where practical.
Machine resolvable.
Version aware.

Identifiers describe identity.

They do not encode mutable runtime state.

A.3. Identifier Categories

TrustGate identifiers are organized into four constitutional categories.

Category	Purpose
Registry Identifiers	Identify governed definitions
Runtime Identifiers	Identify execution capabilities and instances
Constitutional Artifact Identifiers	Identify immutable assurance artifacts
Planned Constitutional Identifiers	Reserved for future constitutional capabilities

A.4. Registry Identifiers

VRID — Validation Rule Identifier

Identifies a governed validation rule published in the Validation Rule Registry.

Example

VRID-VAL-SCHEMA-000124

Governed by:

Validation Rule Registry

Immutable:

MEID — Micro Engine Identifier

Identifies a canonical executable micro-engine.

Each MEID represents one governed execution capability.

Example

MEID-TG-VALID-001

Governed by:

Canonical Micro-Engine Registry

Immutable:

EID — Engine Identifier

Identifies an Engine that owns one or more Micro Engines.

Example

EID-TG-VALIDATION

Governed by:

Engine Registry

Immutable:

CMI — Canonical Managed Identifier

Identifies governed executable artifacts such as micro-engines, computation artifacts, reusable workflows, templates, and managed platform components.

CMIs are resolved from the canonical zar.cmi_registry and used throughout compilation, orchestration, deployment, and integration workflows.

Example

vera.TG-VALID.ENGINE.VALIDATOR.1_0_0

Governed by:

CMI Registry

Immutable:

A.5. Runtime Identifiers

CSI — Canonical Signal Identifier

Identifies a governed signal definition.

CSI identifies what a signal represents.

Governed by:

Signal Catalog

USO ID

Identifies a specific runtime instance of the Universal Signal Ontology.

USO IDs identify individual observed signals.

Governed by:

Universal Signal Ontology

XPID — Execution Profile Identifier

Identifies a governed execution profile describing how constitutional execution shall occur.

Execution profiles may specify:

orchestration strategy;
optimization profile;
federation mode;
replay guarantees;
execution policies.

XPIDs are reserved for future constitutional execution governance.

A.6. Constitutional Artifact Identifiers

TG-VRES

Canonical Validation Result.

Represents the immutable outcome of constitutional validation.

Produced by:

Validation-capable MEIDs

VEVID — Validation Evidence Identifier

Identifies immutable validation evidence.

Evidence remains replayable and explainable.

Produced by:

Validation Engine

TOID — Trust Object Identifier

Identifies an immutable Trust Object.

Trust Objects preserve explainable constitutional trust evaluations.

Produced by:

Trust Engine

TVID — Trust Vector Identifier

Identifies an immutable Trust Vector.

Trust Vectors summarize one or more Trust Objects into a governed trust profile.

Produced by:

Trust Engine

TAID — Trust Attestation Identifier

Identifies a published TG-ATTEST artifact.

TAIDs uniquely identify constitutional assurance statements exchanged between ECOs.

Produced by:

Attestation Engine

TIID — Trust Intelligence Identifier

Identifies a constitutional Trust Intelligence artifact (TG-INTEL).

TIIDs reference explainable intelligence derived from constitutional execution while preserving provenance and replayability.

Produced by:

Trust Intelligence Engine

The TrustGate ecosystem interoperates with additional canonical identifiers defined elsewhere within the ZAYAZ platform.

These include, but are not limited to:

Identifier	Purpose	Governing Specification
ECO Number	Organization identity	Constitutional Identity Architecture
CMID	Canonical Metric Identifier	Canonical Metric Identifier System
NACE ID	Economic activity classification	NACE Registry
Country ID	Country registry	Country Registry
Unit ID	Measurement unit	Canonical Unit Registry
Currency ID	Monetary unit	Currency Registry

These identifiers remain governed by their respective constitutional specifications.

A.8. Identifier Relationships

Canonical identifiers form a governed lineage across constitutional execution.

EID
 │
 ▼
MEID
 │
 ▼
VRID
 │
 ▼
CSI
 │
 ▼
USO ID
 │
 ▼
TG-VRES
 │
 ▼
VEVID
 │
 ▼
TOID
 │
 ▼
TVID
 │
 ▼
TAID
 │
 ▼
TIID

Each identifier extends constitutional lineage without replacing preceding identities.

A.9. Identifier Governance

Canonical identifiers shall satisfy the following requirements.

Assigned once.
Never reused.
Never reassigned.
Never altered after publication.
Persist across replay.
Persist across federation.
Preserve provenance.
Remain globally unique within their governing scope.

Identifier governance is normative.

A.10. Relationship to CIA

This appendix supplements the Canonical Identity Architecture (CIA).

CIA defines:

identifier lifecycle;
allocation;
governance;
persistence;
federation;
versioning.

This appendix specifies only the identifiers used by TrustGate micro-engines and their constitutional relationships.

The Canonical Identity Architecture remains the authoritative specification for identifier governance.

APPENDIX B — Initial Canonical Micro-Engine Registry

B.1 Purpose

This appendix defines the initial constitutional registry of TrustGate Micro Engines.

The registry establishes the canonical execution capabilities that comprise the TrustGate assurance platform. Each Micro Engine represents a governed execution responsibility within the Canonical Execution Pipeline (CEP) and is uniquely identified by a Micro Engine Identifier (MEID) and a Canonical Managed Identifier (CMI).

The registry is normative.

Implementations may extend the registry through constitutional governance but shall not alter the semantics of registered engines.

B.2 Constitutional Principles

Every registered Micro Engine shall:

belong to exactly one Engine (EID);
possess a unique MEID;
possess a unique CMI;
declare a constitutional responsibility;
participate in CALM;
support constitutional telemetry;
preserve replay compatibility where applicable.

Micro Engines define execution responsibilities, not implementation technologies.

B.3 Initial Canonical Registry

MEID	CMI	Engine (EID)	Canonical Name	Primary Responsibility	CEP Stage	Replay	Federation
MEID-TG-PARSE-001	`vera.TG-PARSE.ENGINE.SIGNAL.1_0_0`	EID-TG-INGEST	Signal Parser Engine	Parse external payloads into canonical signal objects.	1	✓	✓
MEID-TG-NORM-001	`vera.TG-NORM.ENGINE.NORMALIZER.1_0_0`	EID-TG-INGEST	Signal Normalizer Engine	Normalize schemas, timestamps, units and identifiers.	2	✓	✓
MEID-TG-ENRICH-001	`vera.TG-ENRICH.ENGINE.METADATA.1_0_0`	EID-TG-INGEST	Metadata Enrichment Engine	Attach CSI, USO, ECO Number and contextual lineage.	3	✓	✓
MEID-TG-VALID-001	`vera.TG-VALID.ENGINE.VALIDATOR.1_0_0`	EID-TG-VALIDATION	Validation Engine	Execute governed validation rules (VRIDs).	4	✓	✓
MEID-TG-TRUST-001	`vera.TG-TRUST.ENGINE.SCORER.1_0_0`	EID-TG-TRUST	Trust Scoring Engine	Compute TOIDs, TVIDs and Trust Status.	5	✓	✓
MEID-TG-DECIDE-001	`vera.TG-DECISION.ENGINE.ROUTER.1_0_0`	EID-TG-TRUST	Decision Engine	Determine operational trust outcome.	6	✓	✓
MEID-TG-REPLAY-001	`vera.TG-REPLAY.ENGINE.REPLAYER.1_0_0`	EID-TG-REPLAY	Replay Engine	Produce deterministic replay packages and verification artifacts.	7	Native	✓
MEID-TG-ATTEST-001	`vera.TG-ATTEST.ENGINE.ASSURANCE.1_0_0`	EID-TG-ATTEST	Attestation Engine	Generate TG-ATTEST artifacts and TAIDs.	8	✓	✓
MEID-TG-DAL-001	`vera.TG-DAL.ENGINE.ANCHOR.1_0_0`	EID-TG-ATTEST	DAL Anchor Engine	Prepare constitutional artifacts for distributed anchoring.	9	✓	✓
MEID-TG-FED-001	`vera.TG-FEDERATION.ENGINE.EXCHANGE.1_0_0`	EID-TG-FEDERATION	Federation Exchange Engine	Exchange constitutional artifacts between ECOs.	10	✓	Native
MEID-TG-INTEL-001	`vera.TG-INTEL.ENGINE.INTELLIGENCE.1_0_0`	EID-TG-INTELLIGENCE	Trust Intelligence Engine	Generate TG-INTEL artifacts (TIIDs).	11	✓	✓

B.4 Engine Domains

The registry groups Micro Engines into constitutional engine domains.

Engine Identifier	Constitutional Domain
EID-TG-INGEST	Signal acquisition and normalization
EID-TG-VALIDATION	Constitutional validation
EID-TG-TRUST	Trust computation
EID-TG-REPLAY	Deterministic replay
EID-TG-ATTEST	Constitutional attestation
EID-TG-FEDERATION	Federation and cross-ECO exchange
EID-TG-INTELLIGENCE	Trust Intelligence and constitutional learning

Each Engine represents a constitutional capability composed of one or more governed Micro Engines.

B.5 Canonical Execution Alignment

Every registered Micro Engine participates in the Canonical Execution Pipeline (CEP).

Stage 1   Signal Parser
        ↓
Stage 2   Signal Normalizer
        ↓
Stage 3   Metadata Enrichment
        ↓
Stage 4   Validation
        ↓
Stage 5   Trust Scoring
        ↓
Stage 6   Decision
        ↓
Stage 7   Replay
        ↓
Stage 8   Attestation
        ↓
Stage 9   DAL Anchor
        ↓
Stage 10  Federation
        ↓
Stage 11  Trust Intelligence

Alternative execution sequences may be defined through governed Execution Profiles (XPIDs) while preserving constitutional equivalence.

B.6 Runtime Responsibilities

Each Micro Engine shall declare:

constitutional responsibility;
accepted artifact types;
produced artifact types;
supported replay level;
supported federation level;
lifecycle participation (CALM);
telemetry contract;
execution contract;
version.

These declarations form part of the Canonical Micro-Engine Registry.

B.7 Constitutional Artifact Production

The initial registry produces the following constitutional artifacts.

Artifact	Producing Micro Engine
CSI / USO Instance	Signal Parser & Metadata Enrichment
TG-VRES	Validation Engine
VEVID	Validation Engine
TOID	Trust Scoring Engine
TVID	Trust Scoring Engine
Trust Status	Decision Engine
Replay Package	Replay Engine
TG-ATTEST / TAID	Attestation Engine
Federation Package	Federation Exchange Engine
TG-INTEL / TIID	Trust Intelligence Engine

Artifact ownership is exclusive unless explicitly governed otherwise.

B.8 Registry Evolution

The Canonical Micro-Engine Registry is expected to evolve.

Future versions may introduce additional governed engines, including:

policy orchestration;
execution profile management (XPID);
federation routing;
cryptographic services;
trust analytics;
autonomous optimization.

New engines shall preserve backward constitutional compatibility.

B.9 Relationship to the CMI Registry

The Canonical Micro-Engine Registry references executable artifacts through the Canonical Managed Identifier (CMI) Registry.

The CMI Registry governs:

executable artifact identity;
artifact versioning;
compilation;
dependency resolution;
deployment.

This appendix governs the constitutional role of each Micro Engine, while the CMI Registry governs the executable artifacts that implement those roles.

B.10 Summary

The Initial Canonical Micro-Engine Registry defines the foundational execution capabilities of the TrustGate platform.

By assigning immutable identities (MEIDs), executable identities (CMIs), constitutional responsibilities, and execution stages to each Micro Engine, the registry provides the authoritative execution inventory for validation, trust computation, attestation, replay, federation, and constitutional intelligence.

Future constitutional capabilities shall extend this registry through governed evolution while preserving the architectural principles defined by the Canonical Execution Pipeline (CEP), the Canonical Identity Architecture (CIA), the Canonical Artifact Lifecycle Model (CALM), and the Canonical Persistence Architecture (CPA).

APPENDIX C — Runtime Pipeline Reference (CEP Stages & MEID Mappings)

C.1 Purpose

This appendix defines the normative mapping between the Canonical Execution Pipeline (CEP), the TrustGate Micro Engines (MEIDs), and the constitutional artifacts produced throughout runtime execution.

The Canonical Execution Pipeline specifies constitutional execution behaviour, not implementation-specific workflows.

All TrustGate implementations shall preserve the constitutional sequence and artifact lineage defined herein.

C.2 Constitutional Principles

The Canonical Execution Pipeline shall:

preserve deterministic execution;
preserve constitutional lineage;
produce immutable constitutional artifacts;
remain replayable;
remain explainable;
remain technology independent.

Alternative execution implementations are permitted provided constitutional behaviour remains equivalent.

C.3 Canonical Execution Pipeline Overview

The constitutional runtime flow is illustrated below.

External Evidence
        │
        ▼
Signal Parser
        │
        ▼
Signal Normalizer
        │
        ▼
Metadata Enrichment
        │
        ▼
Validation
        │
        ▼
Trust Scoring
        │
        ▼
Decision
        │
        ▼
Replay
        │
        ▼
Attestation
        │
        ▼
DAL Anchor
        │
        ▼
Federation
        │
        ▼
Trust Intelligence

Each stage contributes additional constitutional information while preserving all preceding lineage.

C.4 CEP Stage Reference

CEP Stage	MEID	Canonical Engine	Primary Responsibility	Primary Outputs
1	MEID-TG-PARSE-001	Signal Parser Engine	Parse external payloads into canonical runtime objects	Canonical input object
2	MEID-TG-NORM-001	Signal Normalizer Engine	Normalize identifiers, timestamps, units and schema versions	Normalized signal
3	MEID-TG-ENRICH-001	Metadata Enrichment Engine	Attach CSI, USO, ECO Number and contextual lineage	Enriched signal
4	MEID-TG-VALID-001	Validation Engine	Execute governed validation rules (VRIDs)	TG-VRES, VEVID
5	MEID-TG-TRUST-001	Trust Scoring Engine	Compute constitutional trust	TOID, TVID
6	MEID-TG-DECIDE-001	Decision Engine	Determine operational trust disposition	Trust Status
7	MEID-TG-REPLAY-001	Replay Engine	Produce deterministic replay package	Replay Package
8	MEID-TG-ATTEST-001	Attestation Engine	Generate constitutional assurance	TG-ATTEST, TAID
9	MEID-TG-DAL-001	DAL Anchor Engine	Prepare immutable artifacts for anchoring	Anchor Candidate
10	MEID-TG-FED-001	Federation Exchange Engine	Exchange constitutional artifacts across ECOs	Federation Package
11	MEID-TG-INTEL-001	Trust Intelligence Engine	Produce explainable intelligence	TG-INTEL, TIID

C.5 Constitutional Artifact Progression

Each CEP stage extends constitutional lineage.

Signal
      │
      ▼
TG-VRES
      │
      ▼
VEVID
      │
      ▼
TOID
      │
      ▼
TVID
      │
      ▼
Trust Status
      │
      ▼
Replay Package
      │
      ▼
TG-ATTEST
      │
      ▼
TAID
      │
      ▼
Federation Package
      │
      ▼
TG-INTEL
      │
      ▼
TIID

Artifacts are additive.

No constitutional artifact replaces or mutates a previously published artifact.

C.6 Stage Responsibilities

Each execution stage has a distinct constitutional responsibility.

Stage	Constitutional Responsibility
Parse	Establish canonical runtime representation
Normalize	Ensure structural consistency
Enrich	Establish identity and lineage
Validate	Establish compliance
Trust	Establish confidence
Decide	Establish operational disposition
Replay	Preserve deterministic reconstruction
Attest	Publish constitutional assurance
Anchor	Prepare immutable cryptographic evidence
Federate	Exchange constitutional artifacts
Understand	Produce constitutional trust intelligence

Together these stages implement the Constitutional Assurance Chain (CAC).

C.7 Execution Contracts

Each Micro Engine shall publish an execution contract defining:

accepted artifact types;
produced artifact types;
required preconditions;
postconditions;
replay guarantees;
telemetry contract;
version;
constitutional invariants.

Execution contracts form part of the Canonical Micro-Engine Registry.

C.8 Telemetry Mapping

Every CEP stage shall emit constitutional telemetry.

Minimum telemetry includes:

Stage	Required Telemetry
Parse	Execution ID, MEID, timestamps
Normalize	Schema version, normalization actions
Enrich	CSI, USO ID, lineage metadata
Validate	VRID, TG-VRES, VEVID
Trust	TOID, TVID, Trust Status
Decide	Operational decision
Replay	Replay identifier, execution chronology
Attest	TAID, signature metadata
Anchor	Anchor reference, integrity metadata
Federate	Origin ECO, destination ECO, exchange status
Intelligence	TIID, model identifier, confidence metadata

Telemetry constitutes part of the constitutional execution record.

C.9 Replay Alignment

The Canonical Execution Pipeline is fully replayable.

Replay shall reconstruct:

execution order;
consumed artifacts;
produced artifacts;
policy versions;
engine versions;
execution contracts;
constitutional telemetry.

Replay reconstructs constitutional behaviour rather than implementation details.

C.10 Execution Profiles

Future versions of the Canonical Execution Pipeline may introduce Execution Profiles (XPIDs).

Execution Profiles will define governed variations of constitutional execution while preserving equivalent constitutional outcomes.

Example profile categories include:

XPID Category	Purpose
Standard	Default constitutional execution
High Assurance	Enhanced validation and trust computation
Real-Time	Low-latency execution
Batch	Large-scale processing
Federation	Cross-ECO optimized execution
Replay	Optimized for deterministic reconstruction

Execution Profiles shall never alter constitutional semantics.

C.11 Constitutional Constraints

The Canonical Execution Pipeline shall satisfy the following requirements.

Every execution shall follow governed CEP stages.
Every stage shall preserve constitutional lineage.
Every stage shall emit constitutional telemetry.
Every constitutional artifact shall remain immutable after publication.
Replay shall reconstruct the complete execution chain.
Federation shall preserve artifact identity and provenance.
Execution Profiles shall preserve constitutional equivalence.

These constraints are normative.

C.12 Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks

The Canonical Execution Pipeline integrates with the following constitutional frameworks:

CIA — Canonical Identity Architecture
CALM — Canonical Artifact Lifecycle Model
CPA — Canonical Persistence Architecture
CAC — Constitutional Assurance Chain
CRA — Canonical Replay Architecture
CIL — Constitutional Intelligence Lifecycle

Together these frameworks establish the operational architecture of the TrustGate platform.

C.13 Summary

The Runtime Pipeline Reference defines the authoritative mapping between CEP stages, TrustGate Micro Engines, constitutional artifacts, and runtime responsibilities.

By establishing a deterministic execution sequence with explicit MEID mappings, immutable artifact progression, governed telemetry, and replay compatibility, the Canonical Execution Pipeline becomes the constitutional execution model for all TrustGate implementations. Future orchestration technologies, Execution Profiles (XPIDs), federation strategies, and replay mechanisms shall extend this model while preserving constitutional behaviour and lineage.

APPENDIX D — Constitutional Artifact Relationships

D.1 Purpose

This appendix defines the constitutional relationships between the canonical artifacts produced and consumed by the TrustGate platform.

These relationships establish the immutable lineage connecting observations, validation, trust, assurance, replay, federation, and constitutional intelligence.

The artifact relationship model is normative.

D.2 Constitutional Principles

Constitutional artifacts shall satisfy the following principles.

Every artifact possesses immutable identity.
Every artifact preserves provenance.
Every artifact maintains constitutional lineage.
Relationships are additive.
Relationships are replayable.
Relationships remain explainable.
Relationships are technology independent.

Published artifacts shall never invalidate previously published artifacts.

D.3 Constitutional Artifact Families

TrustGate artifacts are organized into constitutional families.

Family	Primary Purpose
Signal	Observation of reality
Validation	Establish compliance
Trust	Establish confidence
Decision	Establish operational disposition
Replay	Preserve deterministic reconstruction
Attestation	Publish constitutional assurance
Federation	Exchange constitutional artifacts
Intelligence	Generate governed analytical insight

Each family extends the constitutional assurance chain.

D.4 Primary Constitutional Lineage

The canonical lineage of constitutional artifacts is illustrated below.

Signal (CSI / USO)
        │
        ▼
TG-VRES
        │
        ▼
VEVID
        │
        ▼
TOID
        │
        ▼
TVID
        │
        ▼
Trust Status
        │
        ▼
Replay Package
        │
        ▼
TG-ATTEST (TAID)
        │
        ▼
Federation Package
        │
        ▼
TG-INTEL (TIID)

Each artifact extends constitutional knowledge while preserving all preceding lineage.

D.5 Identity Relationships

The following identifiers establish constitutional identity.

Identifier	Identifies
CSI	Canonical Signal Definition
USO ID	Runtime Signal Instance
VRID	Validation Rule
TG-VRES	Validation Result
VEVID	Validation Evidence
TOID	Trust Object
TVID	Trust Vector
TAID	Trust Attestation
TIID	Trust Intelligence
MEID	Micro Engine
EID	Engine
CMI	Executable Artifact

Identity relationships remain immutable.

D.6 Production Relationships

Every constitutional artifact is produced by a governed execution capability.

Producing MEID	Produced Artifact
Signal Parser Engine	Canonical Runtime Signal
Metadata Enrichment Engine	CSI / USO linkage
Validation Engine	TG-VRES, VEVID
Trust Scoring Engine	TOID, TVID
Decision Engine	Trust Status
Replay Engine	Replay Package
Attestation Engine	TG-ATTEST (TAID)
Federation Exchange Engine	Federation Package
Trust Intelligence Engine	TG-INTEL (TIID)

Artifact production is deterministic.

D.7 Dependency Relationships

Each artifact depends upon one or more preceding constitutional artifacts.

Artifact	Depends Upon
TG-VRES	CSI, USO, VRID
VEVID	TG-VRES
TOID	TG-VRES, VEVID
TVID	One or more TOIDs
Trust Status	TVID
Replay Package	Entire execution history
TG-ATTEST	Replay Package, TVID, VEVID
Federation Package	TG-ATTEST
TG-INTEL	Constitutional artifact graph

Dependency relationships shall remain queryable.

D.8 Provenance Relationships

Every artifact preserves constitutional provenance.

Minimum provenance includes:

originating E-C-O™ Number;
producing MEID;
producing EID;
execution timestamp;
execution contract;
policy version;
schema version;
replay reference.

Provenance forms part of constitutional identity.

D.9 Replay Relationships

Replay reconstructs the complete constitutional artifact graph.

Replay includes:

consumed artifacts;
produced artifacts;
execution order;
telemetry;
execution contracts;
policy versions;
constitutional identifiers.

Replay shall never synthesize new constitutional artifacts.

D.10 Federation Relationships

Federation exchanges preserve constitutional artifact relationships across ECOs.

Federated exchanges preserve:

originating identifiers;
provenance;
signatures;
replay references;
assurance lineage;
constitutional identity.

Receiving ECOs shall not replace originating identifiers.

D.11 Intelligence Relationships

Trust Intelligence derives governed insight from constitutional artifacts.

TG-INTEL artifacts may reference:

Signals;
TG-VRES;
VEVID;
TOIDs;
TVIDs;
Replay Packages;
TG-ATTEST;
Federation Packages.

Trust Intelligence extends constitutional understanding without altering constitutional truth.

D.12 Relationship Graph

The complete constitutional artifact graph is summarized below.

CSI
 │
 ▼
USO Instance
 │
 ▼
TG-VRES
 │
 ▼
VEVID
 │
 ▼
TOID
 │
 ▼
TVID
 │
 ▼
Trust Status
 │
 ▼
Replay Package
 │
 ▼
TG-ATTEST (TAID)
 │
 ▼
Federation Package
 │
 ▼
TG-INTEL (TIID)

All constitutional relationships are directional and immutable.

D.13 Relationship Constraints

The constitutional relationship model shall satisfy the following requirements.

Every artifact shall possess immutable identity.
Every artifact shall preserve provenance.
Every dependency shall remain traceable.
Artifact lineage shall remain replayable.
Relationships shall remain explainable.
Federation shall preserve originating identity.
Intelligence shall extend but never replace constitutional artifacts.

These constraints are normative.

D.14 Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks

The Constitutional Artifact Relationship Model integrates with:

CIA — Canonical Identity Architecture
CEP — Canonical Execution Pipeline
CALM — Canonical Artifact Lifecycle Model
CPA — Canonical Persistence Architecture
CAC — Constitutional Assurance Chain
CRA — Canonical Replay Architecture
CIL — Constitutional Intelligence Lifecycle

Together these frameworks define how constitutional artifacts are created, related, governed, persisted, exchanged, and understood.

D.15 Summary

The Constitutional Artifact Relationship Model establishes the authoritative lineage connecting every constitutional artifact within the TrustGate platform.

By defining immutable identity, deterministic production, explicit dependencies, provenance, replay compatibility, and federation-preserving relationships, this model ensures that every observation, validation, trust assessment, attestation, and intelligence artifact participates in a single coherent constitutional graph. This graph provides the foundation for replay, cross-ECO federation, explainable AI, governance, analytics, and future constitutional enterprise capabilities.

APPENDIX E — Conformance Level Matrix (TG-C1 through TG-C4)

E.1 Purpose

This appendix defines the constitutional conformance levels for TrustGate implementations.

The conformance model establishes progressive levels of constitutional capability while preserving interoperability, deterministic behaviour, and constitutional governance.

Conformance levels describe architectural capabilities, not implementation quality.

E.2 Constitutional Principles

Every TrustGate implementation shall:

preserve constitutional identity;
preserve constitutional lineage;
preserve deterministic behaviour;
preserve explainability;
preserve governance.

Higher conformance levels extend constitutional capabilities without altering constitutional semantics.

E.3 Conformance Overview

Level	Constitutional Capability	Typical Deployment
TG-C1	Core Constitutional Execution	Standalone TrustGate runtime
TG-C2	Deterministic Replay	Enterprise assurance platform
TG-C3	Federation & Cross-ECO Trust	Multi-organization ecosystem
TG-C4	Full Constitutional Intelligence	Complete Constitutional Intelligence Platform

Each level includes all capabilities of the preceding levels.

E.4 TG-C1 — Core Constitutional Execution

TG-C1 establishes the minimum constitutional implementation.

Required capabilities include:

Canonical Identity Architecture (CIA)
Canonical Execution Pipeline (CEP)
Validation Rule Registry (VRIDs)
Canonical Signal Model (CSI / USO)
Trust computation
Constitutional telemetry
Canonical Persistence Architecture (CPA)
Immutable constitutional artifacts

Mandatory artifact support:

TG-VRES
VEVID
TOID
TVID

Typical deployment:

Single organization
Local execution
No federation
Basic assurance

E.5 TG-C2 — Replay-Capable Implementation

TG-C2 extends TG-C1 with deterministic replay.

Additional capabilities include:

Replay Engine
Replay Packages
Execution chronology
Policy version preservation
Engine version preservation
Execution contract preservation
Replay verification

Additional artifact support:

Replay Package

Typical deployment:

Enterprise audit
Regulatory assurance
Historical verification
Internal governance

E.6 TG-C3 — Federation-Capable Implementation

TG-C3 extends TG-C2 with constitutional federation.

Additional capabilities include:

Federation Exchange Engine
TG-ATTEST generation
TAID support
Cross-ECO exchange
Signature verification
Provenance preservation
Constitutional trust exchange

Additional artifact support:

TG-ATTEST
TAID
Federation Package

Typical deployment:

Supply-chain ecosystems
Regulatory exchanges
Partner networks
Industry collaboration

E.7 TG-C4 — Constitutional Intelligence Implementation

TG-C4 represents full constitutional implementation.

Additional capabilities include:

Trust Intelligence Engine
TG-INTEL generation
TIID support
Constitutional learning
Explainable AI
Governed recommendations
Intelligence provenance

Additional artifact support:

TG-INTEL
TIID

Typical deployment:

Constitutional Intelligence Platform
Constitutional ERP
Advanced analytics
AI-assisted governance
Predictive constitutional intelligence

E.8 Capability Matrix

Capability	TG-C1	TG-C2	TG-C3	TG-C4
CIA	✓	✓	✓	✓
CEP	✓	✓	✓	✓
CPA	✓	✓	✓	✓
CALM	✓	✓	✓	✓
Validation	✓	✓	✓	✓
Trust	✓	✓	✓	✓
Replay		✓	✓	✓
Attestation			✓	✓
Federation			✓	✓
Trust Intelligence				✓
Explainable AI				✓
Constitutional Learning				✓

E.9 Artifact Support Matrix

Constitutional Artifact	TG-C1	TG-C2	TG-C3	TG-C4
CSI / USO	✓	✓	✓	✓
TG-VRES	✓	✓	✓	✓
VEVID	✓	✓	✓	✓
TOID	✓	✓	✓	✓
TVID	✓	✓	✓	✓
Trust Status	✓	✓	✓	✓
Replay Package		✓	✓	✓
TG-ATTEST / TAID			✓	✓
Federation Package			✓	✓
TG-INTEL / TIID				✓

E.10 Conformance Verification

Conformance assessments shall evaluate constitutional behaviour rather than implementation details.

Verification includes:

identifier governance;
execution determinism;
artifact lineage;
replay capability;
federation interoperability;
telemetry completeness;
constitutional invariants.

Implementations may exceed the requirements of a conformance level provided constitutional compatibility is preserved.

E.11 Extension Principles

Future constitutional capabilities may introduce additional conformance levels or capability profiles.

Examples include:

domain-specific federation profiles;
sector assurance profiles;
execution profile certifications (XPID);
constitutional AI profiles;
cryptographic assurance profiles.

New profiles shall remain backward compatible with existing conformance levels.

E.12 Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks

Conformance is evaluated across the constitutional framework family.

Framework	Contribution to Conformance
CIA	Identity governance
CEP	Execution behaviour
CALM	Lifecycle governance
CPA	Persistence
CAC	Assurance semantics
CRA	Replay semantics
CIL	Constitutional intelligence lifecycle

No single framework is sufficient to establish constitutional conformance.

E.13 Constitutional Constraints

Every conformance level shall satisfy the following requirements.

Preserve constitutional identity.
Preserve deterministic execution.
Preserve provenance.
Preserve lineage.
Preserve replay compatibility where applicable.
Preserve federation compatibility where applicable.
Preserve explainability.
Satisfy applicable constitutional invariants.

These constraints are normative.

E.14 Certification (Future)

Future versions of TrustGate may define a formal constitutional certification program.

Certification may include:

architectural review;
replay verification;
federation interoperability testing;
invariant validation;
telemetry validation;
constitutional conformance testing.

Certified implementations may declare their achieved conformance level (for example, TG-C2 Certified or TG-C4 Certified) as part of interoperability and assurance agreements.

E.15 Summary

The TrustGate Conformance Level Matrix defines a progressive constitutional maturity model for TrustGate implementations.

By distinguishing core execution, deterministic replay, federation, and constitutional intelligence capabilities, the model provides a clear roadmap for implementation, interoperability, governance, and future certification. It enables organizations to evolve from standalone constitutional assurance to fully federated, AI-assisted Constitutional Intelligence Platforms while preserving the same constitutional semantics, identity, and trust guarantees.

APPENDIX F — Reference Invariant Families

F.1 Purpose

This appendix defines the constitutional invariant families that govern TrustGate implementations.

An invariant is a property that shall remain true regardless of implementation technology, deployment topology, execution profile, or federation environment.

Invariant families establish the constitutional laws of TrustGate.

They are normative.

F.2 Constitutional Principles

Every invariant shall be:

technology independent;
deterministic;
replayable;
verifiable;
explainable;
enforceable;
federation compatible.

Implementations may extend invariant validation but shall never weaken constitutional invariants.

F.3 Invariant Family Overview

TrustGate invariants are organized into constitutional families.

Family	Governs
IF-100	Identity
IF-200	Lineage
IF-300	Execution
IF-400	Validation
IF-500	Trust
IF-600	Replay
IF-700	Attestation
IF-800	Federation
IF-900	Intelligence

Each family governs one constitutional aspect of runtime behaviour.

F.4 IF-100 — Identity Invariants

Identity invariants preserve constitutional identity.

Examples include:

Identifier	Constitutional Requirement
IF-101	Every constitutional artifact shall possess immutable identity.
IF-102	Identifiers shall never be reassigned.
IF-103	Identifiers shall remain globally unique within their governing scope.
IF-104	Identity shall survive replay.
IF-105	Identity shall survive federation exchange.

Primary frameworks:

CIA
CMI Registry
MEID Registry

F.5 IF-200 — Lineage Invariants

Lineage invariants preserve constitutional provenance.

Examples include:

Identifier	Constitutional Requirement
IF-201	Every artifact shall preserve its producing MEID.
IF-202	Every artifact shall preserve originating E-C-O™ Number.
IF-203	Artifact lineage shall be traceable.
IF-204	Lineage shall remain queryable.
IF-205	Constitutional provenance shall never be removed.

Primary frameworks:

CEP
CALM
CPA

F.6 IF-300 — Execution Invariants

Execution invariants govern constitutional runtime behaviour.

Examples include:

Identifier	Constitutional Requirement
IF-301	CEP stage ordering shall be preserved.
IF-302	Every execution shall emit constitutional telemetry.
IF-303	Every execution shall declare its execution contract.
IF-304	Execution Profiles (XPIDs) shall preserve constitutional equivalence.
IF-305	Execution shall remain deterministic for identical inputs.

Primary frameworks:

CEP
XPID (planned)

F.7 IF-400 — Validation Invariants

Validation invariants govern constitutional assurance.

Examples include:

Identifier	Constitutional Requirement
IF-401	Every TG-VRES shall reference one or more VRIDs.
IF-402	Every validation result shall preserve supporting evidence (VEVID).
IF-403	Validation rules shall be version governed.
IF-404	Validation outcomes shall be reproducible.
IF-405	Validation shall remain explainable.

Primary frameworks:

Validation Rule Registry
TrustGate Validation

F.8 IF-500 — Trust Invariants

Trust invariants govern constitutional trust computation.

Examples include:

Identifier	Constitutional Requirement
IF-501	Every TOID shall derive from constitutional evidence.
IF-502	Every TVID shall aggregate governed TOIDs.
IF-503	Trust computation shall remain deterministic.
IF-504	Trust shall preserve provenance.
IF-505	Trust decisions shall remain explainable.

Primary frameworks:

Trust Registry
Trust Intelligence

F.9 IF-600 — Replay Invariants

Replay invariants guarantee deterministic reconstruction.

Examples include:

Identifier	Constitutional Requirement
IF-601	Replay shall reconstruct constitutional behaviour.
IF-602	Replay shall preserve execution chronology.
IF-603	Replay shall preserve constitutional telemetry.
IF-604	Replay shall never generate synthetic constitutional artifacts.
IF-605	Replay shall produce equivalent constitutional outcomes.

Primary frameworks:

Replay Specification
CRA

F.10 IF-700 — Attestation Invariants

Attestation invariants govern constitutional assurance publication.

Examples include:

Identifier	Constitutional Requirement
IF-701	Every TG-ATTEST shall possess a TAID.
IF-702	Attestations shall reference constitutional evidence.
IF-703	Attestations shall preserve signature integrity.
IF-704	Attestations shall remain immutable after publication.
IF-705	Attestations shall remain replay-verifiable.

Primary frameworks:

TrustGate Attestation Catalog

F.11 IF-800 — Federation Invariants

Federation invariants govern cross-ECO interoperability.

Examples include:

Identifier	Constitutional Requirement
IF-801	Federation shall preserve originating identity.
IF-802	Federation shall preserve provenance.
IF-803	Federation shall preserve signatures.
IF-804	Federation shall preserve replay references.
IF-805	Federation shall never alter constitutional semantics.

Primary frameworks:

Federation Profiles
EGFS

F.12 IF-900 — Intelligence Invariants

Intelligence invariants govern constitutional learning.

Examples include:

Identifier	Constitutional Requirement
IF-901	Intelligence shall derive from constitutional artifacts.
IF-902	Intelligence shall preserve provenance.
IF-903	Intelligence shall remain explainable.
IF-904	Intelligence shall never modify constitutional truth.
IF-905	Intelligence shall remain reproducible where applicable.

Primary frameworks:

TG-INTEL
DSAIL
Constitutional Intelligence Platform

F.13 Invariant Evaluation

Invariant compliance shall be evaluated during:

runtime execution;
replay verification;
federation exchange;
conformance assessment;
certification;
constitutional audits.

Violation of constitutional invariants constitutes a conformance failure.

F.14 Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks

Invariant families span the constitutional framework ecosystem.

Framework	Primary Invariant Families
CIA	IF-100
CEP	IF-200, IF-300
CALM	IF-200
CPA	IF-200, IF-300
Validation Rule Registry	IF-400
Trust Registry	IF-500
CRA	IF-600
Attestation Catalog	IF-700
Federation Profiles	IF-800
Constitutional Intelligence Lifecycle	IF-900

Multiple frameworks may enforce the same invariant family.

F.15 Future Invariant Families

Additional invariant families may be introduced through constitutional governance.

Examples include:

IF-1000 — Constitutional Policy
IF-1100 — Cryptographic Integrity
IF-1200 — Sustainability Intelligence
IF-1300 — Financial Intelligence
IF-1400 — Constitutional ERP
IF-1500 — Autonomous Constitutional Agents

Future families shall extend, rather than replace, existing constitutional invariants.

F.16 Summary

The Reference Invariant Families define the constitutional laws that govern every TrustGate implementation.

By organizing invariants into identity, lineage, execution, validation, trust, replay, attestation, federation, and intelligence families, the model provides a reusable governance framework that spans the entire Constitutional Intelligence Platform. These invariant families ensure that implementations remain deterministic, explainable, replayable, interoperable, and constitutionally compliant regardless of deployment architecture or future evolution.

APPENDIX G — Constitutional Frameworks

G.1 Purpose

This appendix summarizes the constitutional framework family that governs the TrustGate platform.

Each framework defines one aspect of constitutional architecture, together forming a coherent model for identity, execution, assurance, persistence, replay, federation, and intelligence.

Some frameworks are normative within this specification, while others are planned for future constitutional specifications.

G.2 Constitutional Framework Family

The TrustGate architecture is governed by the following framework family.

Framework	Name	Status	Governs
CIA	Canonical Identity Architecture	Normative	Identity, identifiers and provenance
CEP	Canonical Execution Pipeline	Normative	Runtime execution behaviour
CALM	Canonical Artifact Lifecycle Model	Normative	Artifact lifecycle governance
CPA	Canonical Persistence Architecture	Normative	Persistence and storage architecture
CAC	Constitutional Assurance Chain	Planned	Assurance semantics and trust progression
CRA	Canonical Replay Architecture	Planned	Deterministic replay architecture
CIL	Constitutional Intelligence Lifecycle	Planned	Intelligence and decision lifecycle
XPID	Execution Profile Framework	Planned	Governed execution profiles

Together these frameworks establish the constitutional architecture of TrustGate.

G.3 CIA — Canonical Identity Architecture

The Canonical Identity Architecture governs immutable constitutional identity.

Primary responsibilities include:

identifier allocation;
canonical identity;
provenance;
identifier governance;
federation identity;
identity persistence.

Representative identifiers include:

E-C-O™ Number
CMI
CMID
CSI
USO ID
VRID
MEID
EID
TAID
TIID

G.4 CEP — Canonical Execution Pipeline

The Canonical Execution Pipeline governs constitutional execution.

CEP specifies:

execution stages;
execution ordering;
constitutional telemetry;
artifact production;
replay compatibility.

CEP defines how constitutional work is performed.

G.5 CALM — Canonical Artifact Lifecycle Model

CALM governs the lifecycle of constitutional artifacts.

CALM specifies:

artifact creation;
publication;
state transitions;
supersession;
archival;
retirement.

Every constitutional artifact participates in CALM.

G.6 CPA — Canonical Persistence Architecture

CPA governs constitutional persistence.

CPA specifies:

canonical tables;
persistence boundaries;
storage invariants;
artifact persistence;
replay persistence;
API consistency.

CPA defines how constitutional artifacts are stored.

G.7 CAC — Constitutional Assurance Chain (Planned)

CAC will define the semantic progression of constitutional assurance.

Rather than describing execution order, CAC will describe how confidence accumulates through governed constitutional artifacts.

Illustrative progression:

Observe
    │
    ▼
Validate
    │
    ▼
Trust
    │
    ▼
Decide
    │
    ▼
Replay
    │
    ▼
Attest
    │
    ▼
Federate
    │
    ▼
Understand

CAC defines why constitutional assurance can be trusted.

G.8 CRA — Canonical Replay Architecture (Planned)

CRA will define deterministic replay semantics.

Responsibilities include:

replay contracts;
execution reconstruction;
artifact replay;
policy replay;
engine replay;
replay verification.

CRA defines how constitutional execution is reconstructed.

G.9 CIL — Constitutional Intelligence Lifecycle (Planned)

CIL will define the lifecycle through which constitutional information becomes actionable intelligence.

The planned lifecycle aligns with the Constitutional Intelligence Platform:

Collect
      │
      ▼
Observe
      │
      ▼
Assure
      │
      ▼
Understand
      │
      ▼
Need
      │
      ▼
Treat
      │
      ▼
Exchange

Primary responsibilities include:

intelligence generation;
explainability;
recommendation governance;
learning provenance;
constitutional AI.

CIL defines how constitutional knowledge becomes governed decisions and actions.

G.10 XPID — Execution Profile Framework (Planned)

Execution Profiles (XPIDs) will define governed variations of constitutional execution.

Illustrative profile categories include:

XPID Category	Purpose
Standard	Default execution
High Assurance	Maximum validation and evidence
Real-Time	Low-latency execution
Batch	High-volume processing
Federation	Cross-ECO optimized execution
Replay	Replay-optimized execution

Execution Profiles may optimize execution but shall never alter constitutional semantics.

G.11 Framework Relationships

The constitutional frameworks complement one another.

Framework	Primary Question
CIA	Who or what is this?
CEP	How is it executed?
CALM	How does it evolve?
CPA	How is it persisted?
CAC	Why is it trustworthy?
CRA	How is it reconstructed?
CIL	How does it become intelligence?
XPID	Which execution profile governs it?

Each framework addresses a distinct constitutional concern while sharing common identity, lineage, and governance.

G.12 Architectural Layering

The frameworks can be viewed as complementary architectural layers.

Constitutional Intelligence (CIL)
                ▲
                │
Constitutional Assurance (CAC)
                ▲
                │
Replay Architecture (CRA)
                ▲
                │
Execution Profiles (XPID)
                ▲
                │
Execution (CEP)
                ▲
                │
Lifecycle (CALM)
                ▲
                │
Persistence (CPA)
                ▲
                │
Identity (CIA)

Together they establish the constitutional foundation of the TrustGate platform.

G.13 Future Evolution

Additional constitutional frameworks may be introduced through governed architectural evolution.

Potential future frameworks include:

CKG — Constitutional Knowledge Graph
CIF — Constitutional Invariant Framework
CPF — Constitutional Policy Framework
CCF — Constitutional Cryptography Framework
CAF — Constitutional Agent Framework

Future frameworks shall extend the constitutional architecture while preserving compatibility with existing framework definitions.

G.14 Summary

The Constitutional Framework Family defines the architectural foundation of the TrustGate platform.

By separating identity (CIA), execution (CEP), lifecycle (CALM), persistence (CPA), assurance (CAC), replay (CRA), intelligence (CIL), and execution profiles (XPID), the framework family provides a modular yet cohesive constitutional architecture. This separation of concerns enables TrustGate to evolve from a validation engine into a fully governed Constitutional Intelligence Platform while preserving deterministic behaviour, explainability, replayability, and federation compatibility.

GitHub Repo Request for Change (RFC)

APPENDIX A — Canonical Identifier Reference​

A.1. Purpose​

A.2. Constitutional Principles​

A.3. Identifier Categories​

A.4. Registry Identifiers​

A.5. Runtime Identifiers​

A.6. Constitutional Artifact Identifiers​

A.7. Related Canonical Identifiers​

A.8. Identifier Relationships​

A.9. Identifier Governance​

A.10. Relationship to CIA​

APPENDIX B — Initial Canonical Micro-Engine Registry​

B.1 Purpose​

B.2 Constitutional Principles​

B.3 Initial Canonical Registry​

B.4 Engine Domains​

B.5 Canonical Execution Alignment​

B.6 Runtime Responsibilities​

B.7 Constitutional Artifact Production​

B.8 Registry Evolution​

B.9 Relationship to the CMI Registry​

B.10 Summary​

APPENDIX C — Runtime Pipeline Reference (CEP Stages & MEID Mappings)​

C.1 Purpose​

C.2 Constitutional Principles​

C.3 Canonical Execution Pipeline Overview​

C.4 CEP Stage Reference​

C.5 Constitutional Artifact Progression​

C.6 Stage Responsibilities​

C.7 Execution Contracts​

C.8 Telemetry Mapping​

C.9 Replay Alignment​

C.10 Execution Profiles​

C.11 Constitutional Constraints​

C.12 Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks​

C.13 Summary​

APPENDIX D — Constitutional Artifact Relationships​

D.1 Purpose​

D.2 Constitutional Principles​

D.3 Constitutional Artifact Families​

D.4 Primary Constitutional Lineage​

D.5 Identity Relationships​

D.6 Production Relationships​

D.7 Dependency Relationships​

D.8 Provenance Relationships​

D.9 Replay Relationships​

D.10 Federation Relationships​

D.11 Intelligence Relationships​

D.12 Relationship Graph​

D.13 Relationship Constraints​

D.14 Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks​

D.15 Summary​

APPENDIX E — Conformance Level Matrix (TG-C1 through TG-C4)​

E.1 Purpose​

E.2 Constitutional Principles​

E.3 Conformance Overview​

E.4 TG-C1 — Core Constitutional Execution​

E.5 TG-C2 — Replay-Capable Implementation​

E.6 TG-C3 — Federation-Capable Implementation​

E.7 TG-C4 — Constitutional Intelligence Implementation​

E.8 Capability Matrix​

E.9 Artifact Support Matrix​

E.10 Conformance Verification​

E.11 Extension Principles​

E.12 Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks​

E.13 Constitutional Constraints​

E.14 Certification (Future)​

E.15 Summary​

APPENDIX F — Reference Invariant Families​

F.1 Purpose​

F.2 Constitutional Principles​

F.3 Invariant Family Overview​

F.4 IF-100 — Identity Invariants​

F.5 IF-200 — Lineage Invariants​

F.6 IF-300 — Execution Invariants​

F.7 IF-400 — Validation Invariants​

F.8 IF-500 — Trust Invariants​

F.9 IF-600 — Replay Invariants​

F.10 IF-700 — Attestation Invariants​

F.11 IF-800 — Federation Invariants​

APPENDIX A — Canonical Identifier Reference

A.1. Purpose

A.2. Constitutional Principles

A.3. Identifier Categories

A.4. Registry Identifiers

A.5. Runtime Identifiers

A.6. Constitutional Artifact Identifiers

A.7. Related Canonical Identifiers

A.8. Identifier Relationships

A.9. Identifier Governance

A.10. Relationship to CIA

APPENDIX B — Initial Canonical Micro-Engine Registry

B.1 Purpose

B.2 Constitutional Principles

B.3 Initial Canonical Registry

B.4 Engine Domains

B.5 Canonical Execution Alignment

B.6 Runtime Responsibilities

B.7 Constitutional Artifact Production

B.8 Registry Evolution

B.9 Relationship to the CMI Registry

B.10 Summary

APPENDIX C — Runtime Pipeline Reference (CEP Stages & MEID Mappings)

C.1 Purpose

C.2 Constitutional Principles

C.3 Canonical Execution Pipeline Overview

C.4 CEP Stage Reference

C.5 Constitutional Artifact Progression

C.6 Stage Responsibilities

C.7 Execution Contracts

C.8 Telemetry Mapping

C.9 Replay Alignment

C.10 Execution Profiles

C.11 Constitutional Constraints

C.12 Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks

C.13 Summary

APPENDIX D — Constitutional Artifact Relationships

D.1 Purpose

D.2 Constitutional Principles

D.3 Constitutional Artifact Families

D.4 Primary Constitutional Lineage

D.5 Identity Relationships

D.6 Production Relationships

D.7 Dependency Relationships

D.8 Provenance Relationships

D.9 Replay Relationships

D.10 Federation Relationships

D.11 Intelligence Relationships

D.12 Relationship Graph

D.13 Relationship Constraints

D.14 Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks

D.15 Summary

APPENDIX E — Conformance Level Matrix (TG-C1 through TG-C4)

E.1 Purpose

E.2 Constitutional Principles

E.3 Conformance Overview

E.4 TG-C1 — Core Constitutional Execution

E.5 TG-C2 — Replay-Capable Implementation

E.6 TG-C3 — Federation-Capable Implementation

E.7 TG-C4 — Constitutional Intelligence Implementation

E.8 Capability Matrix

E.9 Artifact Support Matrix

E.10 Conformance Verification

E.11 Extension Principles

E.12 Relationship to Constitutional Frameworks

E.13 Constitutional Constraints

E.14 Certification (Future)

E.15 Summary

APPENDIX F — Reference Invariant Families

F.1 Purpose

F.2 Constitutional Principles

F.3 Invariant Family Overview

F.4 IF-100 — Identity Invariants

F.5 IF-200 — Lineage Invariants

F.6 IF-300 — Execution Invariants

F.7 IF-400 — Validation Invariants

F.8 IF-500 — Trust Invariants

F.9 IF-600 — Replay Invariants

F.10 IF-700 — Attestation Invariants

F.11 IF-800 — Federation Invariants