Skip to main content

Chapter 23 — Constitutional Runtime Framework

Part VI — Governance and Authority Runtime​

The Governance and Authority Runtime is the governed constitutional runtime through which ZAYAZ determines who or what may initiate, perform, approve, validate, assure, commit, publish, override, delegate, revoke, escalate or otherwise govern a constitutional execution.

Governance SHALL be executable, contextual, temporally valid, explainable and independently auditable.

The Runtime SHALL distinguish:

  • identity from authority;
  • access from authority;
  • capability from authority;
  • ownership from approval;
  • stewardship from certification;
  • delegation from assignment;
  • validation from assurance;
  • emergency authority from ordinary authority;
  • governance evidence from operational telemetry.

The fact that an actor, Component, agent or service can technically perform an action SHALL NOT establish constitutional authority to perform it.

Conceptually:

Constitutional Authorities
        │
        ├── Constitutional Roles
        ├── Authority Assignments
        ├── Delegations
        ├── Governance Policies
        ├── Separation-of-Duties Policies
        ├── Approval Policies
        ├── Assurance Policies
        └── Emergency Policies
        │
        ▼
Runtime Context
        │
        ▼
Authority Resolution
        │
        ├── Actor Identity
        ├── Purpose
        ├── Scope
        ├── Tenant
        ├── Jurisdiction
        ├── Temporal Validity
        ├── Object Governance
        ├── Relationship Governance
        └── Workflow State
        │
        ▼
Governed Runtime Decision
        │
        ├── Permit
        ├── Permit with Conditions
        ├── Require Approval
        ├── Require Assurance
        ├── Require Escalation
        ├── Suspend
        └── Deny
        │
        ▼
Governance Evidence and Provenance

The Governance and Authority Runtime SHALL execute constitutional governance without redefining the authority model from which it derives.

23.58. Runtime Governance​

Runtime Governance is the constitutional mechanism through which governance policies, authorities, roles, assignments, delegations and control requirements are enforced during execution.

Runtime Governance SHALL govern both:

  • the subject being acted upon; and
  • the action being performed upon that subject.

23.58.1. Purpose​

Runtime Governance SHALL provide a common execution model for:

  • authority resolution;
  • policy enforcement;
  • governance-context resolution;
  • delegation enforcement;
  • separation of duties;
  • approval gates;
  • assurance gates;
  • override governance;
  • exception governance;
  • publication authority;
  • emergency authority;
  • escalation;
  • governance evidence;
  • governance replay;
  • governance impact analysis.

23.58.2. Governance Runtime Boundary​

The Governance Runtime SHALL operate beneath the authority of:

  • the Constitution;
  • Constitutional Authorities;
  • Constitutional Role Registry;
  • Authority Assignments;
  • Constitutional Governance Policies;
  • Constitutional Resolution Policies;
  • applicable jurisdictional requirements;
  • applicable tenant governance overlays.

It SHALL NOT create new authority merely because no explicit prohibition exists.

23.58.3. Governance Subject​

A Governance Subject MAY be:

  • Constitutional Object;
  • Constitutional Relationship;
  • Constitutional Assertion;
  • registry;
  • schema;
  • Validation Rule;
  • Inference Rule;
  • Runtime Bundle;
  • Runtime Manifest;
  • Execution Request;
  • Execution Plan;
  • Validation Outcome;
  • Derived Assertion;
  • report;
  • disclosure;
  • publication;
  • evidence;
  • workflow;
  • finding;
  • waiver;
  • override;
  • agent action;
  • deployment;
  • tenant overlay.

23.58.4. Governance Action​

A Governance Action MAY include:

  • create;
  • read;
  • update;
  • delete;
  • activate;
  • deactivate;
  • approve;
  • reject;
  • validate;
  • verify;
  • certify;
  • assure;
  • delegate;
  • revoke;
  • override;
  • waive;
  • publish;
  • withdraw;
  • correct;
  • supersede;
  • archive;
  • execute;
  • commit;
  • escalate;
  • inspect;
  • export.

Governance Actions SHALL originate from a governed Constitutional Value Provider.

23.58.5. Governance Request​

Every constitutionally significant Governance Action SHALL originate from a Governance Request or from a specialised Execution Request containing equivalent governance metadata.

The request SHALL identify:

  • Governance Request Identifier;
  • requested action;
  • target subject;
  • initiating actor;
  • represented organisation where applicable;
  • purpose;
  • Runtime Context;
  • requested scope;
  • requested authority basis;
  • requested side effects;
  • required completion state;
  • provenance.

23.58.6. Governance Context​

Governance SHALL be evaluated within an explicit Governance Context.

The context MAY include:

  • tenant;
  • organisation;
  • legal entity;
  • jurisdiction;
  • regulatory framework;
  • reporting period;
  • governance domain;
  • object classification;
  • Relationship Type;
  • lifecycle state;
  • workflow state;
  • security profile;
  • assurance level;
  • publication profile;
  • constitutional release;
  • emergency state.

Governance Context SHALL be part of the sealed Runtime Context or linked to it through a governed relationship.

23.58.7. Governance Profiles​

A Governance Profile SHALL define the authority, approval, assurance, separation-of-duties, evidence and escalation requirements applicable to a governed action.

Governance Profile Types MAY include:

  • constitutional activation;
  • registry stewardship;
  • schema governance;
  • rule governance;
  • data governance;
  • calculation governance;
  • report governance;
  • publication governance;
  • assurance governance;
  • AI governance;
  • tenant governance;
  • emergency governance;
  • deployment governance.

23.58.8. Governance Profile Resolution​

CRP SHALL resolve the applicable Governance Profile using:

  • action;
  • subject type;
  • subject classification;
  • tenant;
  • jurisdiction;
  • lifecycle state;
  • reporting framework;
  • assurance level;
  • publication intent;
  • security profile;
  • emergency state.

The Runtime SHALL NOT select a Governance Profile through hidden application configuration.

23.58.9. Governance Policy as Constitutional Object​

Every Governance Policy SHALL be represented as a Constitutional Object.

It SHALL possess:

  • Constitutional Identifier;
  • canonical name;
  • semantic definition;
  • policy type;
  • governing authority;
  • applicability;
  • lifecycle;
  • version;
  • temporal validity;
  • subject scope;
  • action scope;
  • authority requirements;
  • approval requirements;
  • assurance requirements;
  • evidence requirements;
  • exception policy;
  • escalation policy;
  • compiler mappings;
  • provenance.

23.58.10. Governance Decision​

Every governance evaluation SHALL produce a Governance Decision.

Decision classes MAY include:

  • Permitted;
  • Permitted with Conditions;
  • Approval Required;
  • Assurance Required;
  • Escalation Required;
  • Suspended;
  • Denied;
  • Indeterminate;
  • Not Applicable;
  • Not Evaluated.

Indeterminate and Not Evaluated SHALL NOT be interpreted as Permitted.

23.58.11. Governance Decision Identity​

Every Governance Decision SHALL possess:

  • Governance Decision Identifier;
  • Governance Request;
  • target subject;
  • requested action;
  • Runtime Context;
  • Governance Profile;
  • applicable policies;
  • resolved authority;
  • separation-of-duties result;
  • required gates;
  • conditions;
  • expiration;
  • decision status;
  • explanation;
  • provenance.

23.58.12. Governance State​

Governance State MAY include:

  • policy state;
  • authority state;
  • assignment state;
  • delegation state;
  • approval state;
  • assurance state;
  • exception state;
  • escalation state;
  • emergency state;
  • evidence state.

Governance State SHALL remain distinguishable from application state.

23.58.13. Governance Lifecycle​

Governance artefacts SHALL participate in governed lifecycles.

Typical states MAY include:

Draft
        │
        ▼
Proposed
        │
        ▼
Reviewed
        │
        ▼
Approved
        │
        ▼
Active
        │
        ├──► Suspended
        ├──► Revoked
        ▼
Deprecated
        │
        ▼
Superseded
        │
        ▼
Archived

Lifecycle transitions SHALL preserve authority, rationale, time and provenance.

23.58.14. Governance Enforcement Points​

Governance enforcement MAY occur:

  • at request admission;
  • during Context Assembly;
  • during Authority Resolution;
  • before planning;
  • before execution;
  • before privileged Plan Steps;
  • before transaction commit;
  • before publication;
  • before assurance conclusion;
  • during emergency activation;
  • during replay;
  • continuously.

23.58.15. Continuous Governance​

Continuous Governance MAY monitor:

  • authority expiration;
  • delegation revocation;
  • approval expiration;
  • policy changes;
  • Runtime Bundle changes;
  • tenant overlay changes;
  • separation-of-duties conflicts;
  • emergency-state changes;
  • verifier accreditation changes;
  • security incidents;
  • runtime drift.

A material change SHALL trigger affected-decision invalidation and impact analysis.

23.58.16. Governance Determinism​

Equivalent Governance Requests, Runtime Contexts, policy versions, authority states and evidence states SHALL produce semantically equivalent Governance Decisions.

Governance SHALL NOT depend upon:

  • database ordering;
  • undocumented administrative convention;
  • service race conditions;
  • user-interface defaults;
  • hidden superuser privileges;
  • unversioned AI judgement.

23.58.17. Governance Explanation​

Every material Governance Decision SHALL explain:

  • which authority was required;
  • which authority was resolved;
  • which policies applied;
  • which conditions applied;
  • which gates remain;
  • why alternatives were rejected;
  • why the action was permitted, suspended or denied;
  • when the decision expires;
  • what evidence supports the decision.

23.58.18. HECATE Validation​

HECATE SHALL validate:

  • Governance Request identity;
  • Governance Profile applicability;
  • policy versions;
  • authority resolution;
  • separation-of-duties compliance;
  • gate completeness;
  • evidence completeness;
  • tenant isolation;
  • temporal validity;
  • explanation completeness;
  • provenance.

23.59. Authority Resolution​

Authority Resolution is the governed process through which the Runtime determines whether an actor, Role, Component, agent, organisation or external authority possesses sufficient constitutional authority to perform a defined action upon a defined subject within a defined Runtime Context.

Authority Resolution SHALL remain distinct from authentication and technical authorisation.

Authentication establishes identity.

Technical authorisation controls system access.

Authority Resolution establishes constitutional permission.

23.59.1. Authority Request​

Every material Authority Resolution SHALL originate from an Authority Request identifying:

  • Authority Request Identifier;
  • actor identity;
  • represented principal where applicable;
  • requested action;
  • target subject;
  • purpose;
  • Runtime Context;
  • requested scope;
  • requested duration;
  • required authority type;
  • provenance.

23.59.2. Authority Sources​

Authority MAY originate from:

  • Constitutional Authority;
  • Constitutional Role;
  • Authority Assignment;
  • Delegation;
  • legal mandate;
  • regulatory mandate;
  • contractual mandate;
  • tenant governance;
  • organisational governance;
  • workflow assignment;
  • emergency declaration;
  • certification or accreditation;
  • Runtime Component authority.

Every authority source SHALL possess identity, scope, lifecycle, temporal validity and provenance.

23.59.3. Authority Types​

Authority Types MAY include:

  • request authority;
  • execution authority;
  • data-access authority;
  • modification authority;
  • validation authority;
  • review authority;
  • approval authority;
  • delegation authority;
  • override authority;
  • waiver authority;
  • computation authority;
  • publication authority;
  • certification authority;
  • verification authority;
  • assurance authority;
  • emergency authority;
  • revocation authority;
  • escalation authority.

23.59.4. Authority Dimensions​

Authority SHALL be resolved across dimensions including:

  • actor;
  • principal;
  • Role;
  • capability;
  • action;
  • subject;
  • subject type;
  • Relationship Type;
  • tenant;
  • organisation;
  • jurisdiction;
  • temporal period;
  • lifecycle state;
  • workflow state;
  • purpose;
  • assurance level;
  • publication profile;
  • security profile;
  • execution mode.

23.59.5. Authority Candidate Set​

The Runtime SHALL construct an identifiable Authority Candidate Set from:

  • direct assignments;
  • inherited assignments;
  • delegations;
  • Role memberships;
  • organisational positions;
  • workflow assignments;
  • external mandates;
  • emergency authority;
  • Component authority.

Candidate completeness SHALL be declared.

23.59.6. Authority Eligibility​

A candidate authority SHALL be evaluated for:

  • identity;
  • source authority;
  • assignment validity;
  • delegation validity;
  • subject scope;
  • action scope;
  • purpose;
  • tenant;
  • jurisdiction;
  • temporal validity;
  • lifecycle;
  • conditions;
  • revocation;
  • separation-of-duties constraints;
  • evidence.

23.59.7. Authority Chain​

Every resolved authority SHALL preserve the complete Authority Chain.

Conceptually:

Constitutional Authority
        │
        assigns
        ▼
Constitutional Role
        │
        assigned to
        ▼
Actor or Principal
        │
        delegates where permitted
        ▼
Delegate
        │
        exercises within
        ▼
Runtime Context and Scope

The chain SHALL identify:

  • originating authority;
  • intermediate Roles;
  • assignments;
  • delegations;
  • scope;
  • conditions;
  • temporal validity;
  • actor exercising authority.

23.59.8. Direct and Represented Authority​

The Runtime SHALL distinguish:

  • authority exercised by an actor on their own behalf;
  • authority exercised on behalf of an organisation;
  • authority exercised on behalf of another actor;
  • authority exercised by a service;
  • authority exercised by a Runtime Component;
  • authority exercised by an AI agent;
  • authority exercised by a federated runtime.

Representation SHALL be explicit.

23.59.9. Component Authority​

Every Runtime Component SHALL possess a Component Authority Profile defining:

  • permitted capabilities;
  • permitted actions;
  • permitted data scope;
  • permitted tenants;
  • permitted jurisdictions;
  • permitted external services;
  • permitted side effects;
  • permitted execution modes;
  • permitted autonomy;
  • required approvals;
  • expiration;
  • revocation.

A Component SHALL operate with least authority.

23.59.10. Agent Authority​

An AI agent SHALL NOT inherit unrestricted authority from its invoker.

Agent Authority SHALL be:

  • explicit;
  • purpose-bound;
  • capability-bound;
  • scope-bound;
  • tenant-bound;
  • time-bound;
  • revocable;
  • observable;
  • auditable.

An AI agent SHALL NOT:

  • approve its own proposal;
  • expand its own authority;
  • delegate authority unless explicitly permitted;
  • bypass HECATE;
  • activate Derived Assertions without policy;
  • conceal tool use;
  • silently cross tenant or jurisdiction boundaries.

23.59.11. Authority Intersection​

Where multiple authority constraints apply, effective authority SHOULD normally be their constitutional intersection.

The Runtime SHALL choose the narrower scope where constraints differ, unless an explicit policy establishes another result.

23.59.12. Authority Precedence​

Authority precedence MAY consider:

  • legal hierarchy;
  • constitutional hierarchy;
  • jurisdiction;
  • explicit assignment;
  • delegated scope;
  • specificity;
  • temporal validity;
  • emergency status.

Higher technical privilege SHALL not create higher constitutional precedence.

23.59.13. Authority Conflict​

Authority conflicts MAY include:

  • competing authorities;
  • conflicting assignments;
  • overlapping jurisdictions;
  • incompatible delegations;
  • expired and active claims;
  • tenant and Core policy conflict;
  • emergency and ordinary authority conflict.

Unresolved authority conflict SHALL prevent authoritative execution.

23.59.14. Authority Outcome​

An Authority Resolution Outcome SHALL identify:

  • Authority Outcome Identifier;
  • Authority Request;
  • candidate authorities;
  • eligible authorities;
  • rejected authorities;
  • resolved Authority Chain;
  • effective scope;
  • conditions;
  • required gates;
  • expiration;
  • conflict status;
  • decision;
  • explanation;
  • provenance.

23.59.15. Authority Caching​

A prior Authority Outcome MAY be reused only where:

  • actor identity remains valid;
  • authority assignments are unchanged;
  • delegation remains active;
  • Context Fingerprint remains compatible;
  • target and action are equivalent;
  • temporal validity remains satisfied;
  • no revocation has occurred;
  • policy permits reuse.

23.59.16. Authority Invalidation​

An Authority Outcome SHALL be invalidated upon:

  • assignment change;
  • delegation revocation;
  • Role change;
  • authority expiration;
  • policy change;
  • Context change;
  • tenant change;
  • jurisdiction change;
  • security event;
  • emergency termination;
  • subject lifecycle change.

23.59.17. Authority Replay​

Authority Resolution SHALL support replay using the historical authority graph, assignments, delegations, policies, context and temporal state.

Current authority SHALL NOT silently replace historical authority during replay.

23.60. Delegation​

Delegation is the governed transfer of authority to perform defined actions within a bounded scope, purpose and period.

Delegation SHALL NOT transfer more authority than the delegating authority possesses.

Delegation SHALL remain distinguishable from:

  • Role assignment;
  • task assignment;
  • technical impersonation;
  • credential sharing;
  • proxy authentication;
  • ownership transfer.

23.60.1. Delegation Object​

Every delegation SHALL be represented as a Constitutional Object or governed Constitutional Relationship possessing:

  • Delegation Identifier;
  • delegating authority;
  • delegator identity;
  • delegate identity;
  • delegated Authority Type;
  • action scope;
  • subject scope;
  • purpose;
  • tenant;
  • jurisdiction;
  • start time;
  • end time;
  • conditions;
  • sub-delegation policy;
  • approval;
  • lifecycle;
  • revocation state;
  • evidence;
  • provenance.

23.60.2. Delegation Types​

Delegation Types MAY include:

  • direct delegation;
  • Role delegation;
  • task-specific delegation;
  • workflow delegation;
  • temporary delegation;
  • standing delegation;
  • emergency delegation;
  • Component delegation;
  • agent delegation;
  • federated delegation;
  • assurance delegation.

23.60.3. Delegation Authority​

The delegator SHALL possess explicit Delegation Authority.

Authority to perform an action SHALL NOT automatically include authority to delegate that action.

23.60.4. Delegation Scope​

Delegation scope MAY be constrained by:

  • action;
  • subject;
  • subject type;
  • tenant;
  • organisation;
  • jurisdiction;
  • reporting period;
  • lifecycle state;
  • workflow;
  • security classification;
  • assurance level;
  • publication profile;
  • monetary or materiality threshold;
  • execution count;
  • time period.

23.60.5. Delegation Conditions​

Conditions MAY include:

  • prior approval;
  • dual control;
  • maximum value;
  • maximum risk;
  • required evidence;
  • required validation status;
  • permitted Runtime Component;
  • prohibited side effects;
  • permitted hours or dates;
  • mandatory notification;
  • mandatory retrospective review.

23.60.6. Delegation Acceptance​

A delegation MAY require acceptance by the delegate.

Acceptance SHALL preserve:

  • delegate identity;
  • accepted scope;
  • accepted conditions;
  • acceptance time;
  • expiration;
  • provenance.

23.60.7. Delegation Activation​

A delegation SHALL become active only after:

  • delegator authority is validated;
  • scope is validated;
  • prohibited conflicts are cleared;
  • required approval exists;
  • acceptance exists where required;
  • HECATE validation passes;
  • activation time is reached.

23.60.8. Delegation Chain​

Sub-delegation SHALL be permitted only where explicitly authorised.

Every delegation chain SHALL preserve:

  • originating authority;
  • each delegator;
  • each delegate;
  • each scope reduction;
  • each condition;
  • each temporal interval;
  • each approval;
  • each revocation state.

A downstream delegation SHALL not broaden upstream authority.

23.60.9. Delegation Depth​

Delegation depth SHOULD be bounded.

The applicable Governance Profile SHALL define:

  • maximum depth;
  • prohibited Role combinations;
  • required approvals;
  • required evidence;
  • escalation conditions.

23.60.10. Delegation Cycles​

Delegation cycles SHALL be prohibited.

HECATE SHALL detect direct, indirect, conditional and federated cycles.

23.60.11. Delegation Expiration​

Every delegation SHALL define:

  • effective start;
  • effective end or review date;
  • automatic expiration;
  • renewal policy;
  • expiration behaviour;
  • dependent execution treatment.

Expired delegation SHALL not authorise new actions.

23.60.12. Delegation Revocation​

Delegation MAY be revoked by an authorised party.

Revocation SHALL identify:

  • revoked delegation;
  • revoking authority;
  • reason;
  • effective time;
  • immediate or delayed effect;
  • affected active executions;
  • affected approvals;
  • downstream sub-delegations;
  • provenance.

23.60.13. Partial Revocation​

A delegation MAY be narrowed without complete revocation.

The change SHALL create a new version, preserve prior scope and trigger affected Authority Outcome invalidation.

23.60.14. Delegation Suspension​

Delegation MAY be suspended due to:

  • investigation;
  • security incident;
  • conflict of interest;
  • authority uncertainty;
  • evidence deficiency;
  • policy change;
  • emergency state.

Suspension SHALL preserve historical validity before the suspension time.

23.60.15. Emergency Delegation​

Emergency delegation SHALL be:

  • explicitly classified;
  • narrowly scoped;
  • time-limited;
  • independently logged;
  • subject to compensating controls;
  • subject to retrospective review;
  • automatically expired.

23.60.16. Delegation Evidence​

Delegation Evidence MAY include:

  • signed instrument;
  • board resolution;
  • employment record;
  • Role assignment;
  • workflow assignment;
  • legal mandate;
  • contractual instrument;
  • emergency declaration;
  • digital signature;
  • approval record.

23.60.17. Delegation Explanation​

A delegation explanation SHALL state:

  • who delegated;
  • what was delegated;
  • to whom;
  • for what purpose;
  • within which scope;
  • for which period;
  • under which conditions;
  • whether sub-delegation is permitted;
  • whether the delegation remains active.

23.61. Separation of Duties​

Separation of Duties, abbreviated SoD, is the governed distribution of authority and responsibility that prevents one actor, Role, Component or agent from controlling incompatible stages of a constitutionally significant process.

SoD SHALL be enforced through explicit Constitutional Policies.

23.61.1. SoD Policy​

Every SoD Policy SHALL possess:

  • Constitutional Identifier;
  • policy type;
  • governed process;
  • incompatible Roles;
  • incompatible actions;
  • incompatible relationship combinations;
  • applicable subjects;
  • applicability;
  • tenant;
  • jurisdiction;
  • temporal validity;
  • severity;
  • exception policy;
  • compensating-control policy;
  • provenance.

23.61.2. SoD Types​

SoD MAY include:

  • static SoD;
  • dynamic SoD;
  • transactional SoD;
  • workflow SoD;
  • cross-period SoD;
  • cross-tenant SoD;
  • Component SoD;
  • agent SoD;
  • assurance independence;
  • governance independence.

23.61.3. Static SoD​

Static SoD prohibits an actor from holding incompatible Roles simultaneously.

Examples include:

  • rule author and sole rule approver;
  • evidence submitter and sole certifier;
  • system administrator and sole audit reviewer;
  • compiler publisher and sole runtime activator.

23.61.4. Dynamic SoD​

Dynamic SoD permits an actor to hold multiple Roles but prohibits incompatible participation within the same governed execution, transaction, report, workflow or assurance engagement.

23.61.5. Action-Based SoD​

Examples include:

  • requester SHALL NOT be sole approver;
  • preparer SHALL NOT be sole reviewer;
  • calculator SHALL NOT be sole verifier;
  • finding owner SHALL NOT be sole waiver approver;
  • publisher SHALL NOT be sole withdrawal approver;
  • AI agent SHALL NOT approve its own proposed action.

23.61.6. Relationship-Based SoD​

SoD MAY depend upon relationships such as:

  • employed by;
  • owns;
  • controls;
  • advised by;
  • financially interested in;
  • related to;
  • certified by;
  • audited by;
  • supplied by.

The Governance Runtime SHALL evaluate relevant Relationship lineage.

23.61.7. Independence Validation​

Assurance and certification roles SHALL be validated for:

  • organisational independence;
  • financial independence;
  • decision independence;
  • evidence independence;
  • technical independence;
  • conflict-of-interest declarations;
  • cooling-off periods where applicable.

23.61.8. Component SoD​

Runtime Components MAY be subject to SoD.

Examples include:

  • the Component producing a calculation SHALL NOT be the sole Component validating the calculation;
  • the Component compiling a rule SHALL NOT be the sole Component approving the compiled artefact;
  • an AI Component proposing a classification SHALL NOT activate it without independent validation.

23.61.9. Cross-Tenant SoD​

A shared service SHALL preserve tenant-specific SoD evaluation.

An actor’s Role in one tenant SHALL NOT satisfy an authority or approval requirement in another tenant unless explicit cross-tenant authority exists.

23.61.10. SoD Evaluation​

SoD evaluation SHALL consider:

  • actor identities;
  • represented principals;
  • Roles;
  • delegations;
  • prior actions;
  • workflow state;
  • relationships;
  • tenant;
  • jurisdiction;
  • temporal period;
  • subject;
  • transaction;
  • assurance engagement.

23.61.11. SoD Conflict​

A detected SoD conflict SHALL produce a governed conflict object or Validation Finding containing:

  • conflict identity;
  • affected actors;
  • conflicting Roles or actions;
  • subject;
  • process;
  • severity;
  • blocking status;
  • exception eligibility;
  • compensating controls;
  • provenance.

23.61.12. SoD Exception​

A SoD exception MAY be permitted only where:

  • the policy permits exception;
  • authority is sufficient;
  • rationale is documented;
  • compensating controls exist;
  • scope is narrow;
  • duration is limited;
  • independent review occurs;
  • provenance is complete.

23.61.13. Compensating Controls​

Compensating controls MAY include:

  • additional approver;
  • independent retrospective review;
  • dual signature;
  • enhanced evidence;
  • restricted side effects;
  • enhanced monitoring;
  • transaction limit;
  • temporary suspension after action;
  • external assurance.

Compensating controls SHALL NOT be treated as equivalent to SoD unless the policy explicitly accepts them.

23.61.14. SoD in Emergency Mode​

Emergency mode MAY relax selected SoD constraints only where:

  • emergency policy permits;
  • controls bypassed are explicit;
  • scope and duration are bounded;
  • compensating controls apply;
  • retrospective review is mandatory;
  • evidence is preserved.

23.61.15. SoD Replay​

Historical SoD evaluation SHALL use the historical Role, relationship, delegation and workflow state.

23.61.16. Pergamum Pulse Analysis​

Pergamum Pulse MAY identify:

  • authority concentration;
  • recurring SoD conflicts;
  • excessive exception use;
  • high-risk Role combinations;
  • cross-tenant governance risk;
  • Component self-approval patterns;
  • agent self-governance risk;
  • assurance independence risk.

Derived findings SHALL remain Intelligence Layer assertions until governed activation.

23.62. Approval Gates​

An Approval Gate is a governed runtime control that prevents a Plan Step, transaction, lifecycle transition, publication or other constitutional action from proceeding until required approval conditions are satisfied.

Approval SHALL be explicit, version-bound and scope-bound.

23.62.1. Approval Gate Object​

Every Approval Gate SHALL possess:

  • Approval Gate Identifier;
  • gate type;
  • governed action;
  • governed subject;
  • Runtime Context;
  • required approver Roles;
  • required authority;
  • quorum;
  • sequence;
  • conditions;
  • evidence requirements;
  • expiration;
  • rejection policy;
  • escalation policy;
  • lifecycle;
  • provenance.

23.62.2. Gate Types​

Approval Gate Types MAY include:

  • single approval;
  • dual approval;
  • sequential approval;
  • parallel approval;
  • quorum approval;
  • unanimous approval;
  • conditional approval;
  • risk-based approval;
  • materiality-based approval;
  • jurisdictional approval;
  • tenant approval;
  • publication approval;
  • emergency approval;
  • retrospective approval.

23.62.3. Approval Request​

An Approval Request SHALL identify:

  • Approval Request Identifier;
  • Approval Gate;
  • subject;
  • action;
  • submitted version;
  • submitter;
  • approver candidates;
  • Runtime Context;
  • evidence package;
  • due date;
  • conditions;
  • provenance.

23.62.4. Version Binding​

Approval SHALL bind to:

  • subject identity;
  • subject version;
  • content fingerprint;
  • Context Fingerprint;
  • Execution Plan version where applicable;
  • Validation Outcome;
  • evidence snapshot.

A material change SHALL invalidate prior approval unless the Approval Policy explicitly defines a compatible change class.

23.62.5. Approval Authority​

Each approver SHALL possess sufficient authority for:

  • the action;
  • the subject;
  • the tenant;
  • the jurisdiction;
  • the value or materiality threshold;
  • the lifecycle transition;
  • the assurance level;
  • the publication profile.

23.62.6. Quorum​

A gate MAY require:

  • one approver;
  • a minimum count;
  • a Role-based quorum;
  • a weighted quorum;
  • unanimous approval;
  • majority approval;
  • approval from each required authority class.

Quorum rules SHALL be deterministic and versioned.

23.62.7. Approval Sequence​

Approval MAY be:

  • sequential;
  • parallel;
  • partially ordered;
  • conditional.

Sequence SHALL be represented explicitly.

Implementation notification order SHALL NOT redefine approval order.

23.62.8. Conditional Approval​

An approval MAY contain conditions.

Conditions SHALL be:

  • explicit;
  • testable;
  • time-bound where applicable;
  • assigned to a responsible Role;
  • validated before the governed action proceeds;
  • preserved in provenance.

23.62.9. Approval Decision​

Approval Decision classes MAY include:

  • Approved;
  • Approved with Conditions;
  • Rejected;
  • Returned for Revision;
  • Abstained;
  • Conflict Declared;
  • Expired;
  • Revoked;
  • Indeterminate.

Abstention SHALL not be treated as approval unless the policy explicitly defines that effect.

23.62.10. Approval Evidence​

Approval Evidence MAY include:

  • digital signature;
  • signed decision;
  • meeting resolution;
  • workflow event;
  • identity assurance;
  • authority resolution;
  • review comments;
  • conditions;
  • conflict-of-interest declaration;
  • timestamp.

23.62.11. Approval Expiration​

Approval MAY expire due to:

  • time;
  • subject change;
  • context change;
  • evidence change;
  • Validation Outcome change;
  • authority expiration;
  • policy change;
  • Runtime Bundle change;
  • regulatory change.

23.62.12. Approval Revocation​

An authorised party MAY revoke approval.

Revocation SHALL preserve:

  • original approval;
  • revoking authority;
  • reason;
  • effective time;
  • affected executions;
  • affected publications;
  • required remediation;
  • provenance.

23.62.13. Approval Rejection​

Rejection SHALL identify:

  • rejecting authority;
  • reason;
  • failed criteria;
  • required revision;
  • resubmission policy;
  • appeal path;
  • provenance.

23.62.14. Approval Timeout​

A gate SHALL define timeout behaviour.

Timeout MAY produce:

  • escalation;
  • reassignment;
  • expiration;
  • rejection;
  • suspension;
  • emergency route.

Timeout SHALL NOT silently produce approval.

23.62.15. Approval Delegation​

Approval authority MAY be delegated only where the applicable Governance Profile permits.

Delegated approval SHALL preserve the complete Delegation Chain.

23.62.16. Batch Approval​

Batch approval SHALL be permitted only where:

  • the subject population is explicit;
  • every subject version is bound;
  • scope is homogeneous;
  • exceptions are visible;
  • authority covers the entire population;
  • sampling is not misrepresented as full approval;
  • provenance preserves each subject.

23.62.17. Approval Explanation​

The Runtime SHALL explain:

  • why approval was required;
  • which approvers were required;
  • whether quorum was met;
  • which conditions apply;
  • which versions were approved;
  • whether approval remains valid;
  • why execution proceeded or remained blocked.

23.63. Assurance Gates​

An Assurance Gate is a governed runtime control that prevents an outcome, disclosure, report, certification, publication or lifecycle transition from proceeding until defined assurance requirements are satisfied.

Assurance SHALL remain distinct from validation and approval.

Validation evaluates conformance.

Approval grants governance consent.

Assurance establishes the justified confidence that may be placed upon the subject and its supporting evidence.

23.63.1. Assurance Gate Object​

Every Assurance Gate SHALL possess:

  • Assurance Gate Identifier;
  • subject;
  • intended use;
  • required Assurance Profile;
  • required assurance level;
  • required verifier or assurer Role;
  • independence requirements;
  • scope;
  • evidence requirements;
  • materiality;
  • unresolved-finding policy;
  • limitation policy;
  • conclusion policy;
  • expiration;
  • provenance.

23.63.2. Assurance Profiles​

Assurance Profiles MAY include:

  • internal review;
  • management review;
  • limited assurance;
  • reasonable assurance;
  • certification;
  • verification;
  • regulatory attestation;
  • scientific review;
  • supplier assurance;
  • product assurance;
  • Digital Product Passport assurance;
  • custom contractual assurance.

23.63.3. Assurance Scope​

Assurance Scope SHALL identify:

  • subject population;
  • period;
  • organisational boundary;
  • product boundary;
  • facility boundary;
  • supply-chain boundary;
  • metrics;
  • calculations;
  • disclosures;
  • evidence;
  • methodologies;
  • exclusions;
  • sampling;
  • limitations.

23.63.4. Assurer Identity and Authority​

The Runtime SHALL validate:

  • assurer identity;
  • accreditation;
  • certification;
  • jurisdictional recognition;
  • scope of competence;
  • independence;
  • engagement assignment;
  • temporal validity;
  • conflict-of-interest status;
  • revocation status.

23.63.5. Independence​

Assurance independence SHALL evaluate:

  • organisational relationships;
  • financial relationships;
  • prior preparation activity;
  • advisory involvement;
  • management responsibility;
  • ownership;
  • employment;
  • familial or controlling relationships;
  • Component or agent self-review.

23.63.6. Assurance Evidence Package​

An Assurance Evidence Package MAY include:

  • subject snapshot;
  • Validation Outcomes;
  • evidence inventory;
  • calculation traces;
  • methodology;
  • Context Fingerprint;
  • materiality assessment;
  • sampling plan;
  • unresolved findings;
  • management representations;
  • prior assurance conclusions;
  • correction history;
  • provenance.

23.63.7. Assurance Preconditions​

An Assurance Gate MAY require:

  • valid subject identity;
  • sealed Runtime Context;
  • completed Validation Plan;
  • acceptable Validation Outcome;
  • complete evidence inventory;
  • resolved material findings;
  • approved methodology;
  • independence confirmation;
  • approved sampling;
  • complete provenance.

23.63.8. Material Findings​

The Assurance Profile SHALL define treatment of:

  • open findings;
  • waived findings;
  • accepted risk;
  • unresolved contradiction;
  • incomplete scope;
  • missing evidence;
  • material misstatement risk;
  • control deficiency.

23.63.9. Assurance Conclusion​

Assurance Conclusion classes MAY include:

  • Unmodified;
  • Unmodified with Emphasis;
  • Qualified;
  • Adverse;
  • Disclaimer;
  • Unable to Conclude;
  • Not Applicable;
  • Withdrawn.

Terminology MAY vary by assurance framework, but mappings SHALL be explicit.

23.63.10. Assurance Limitation​

Limitations SHALL preserve:

  • affected scope;
  • reason;
  • evidence unavailable;
  • procedures not performed;
  • impact;
  • materiality;
  • conclusion effect;
  • required disclosure;
  • provenance.

23.63.11. Assurance Gate Decision​

The gate decision MAY be:

  • Satisfied;
  • Satisfied with Conditions;
  • Satisfied with Disclosed Limitation;
  • Remediation Required;
  • Additional Evidence Required;
  • Additional Procedure Required;
  • Blocked;
  • Indeterminate;
  • Expired.

23.63.12. Assurance Renewal​

Assurance MAY require renewal when:

  • reporting period changes;
  • subject changes materially;
  • methodology changes;
  • evidence changes;
  • material findings emerge;
  • assurance expires;
  • verifier accreditation changes;
  • publication is corrected;
  • Runtime Bundle changes in a material way.

23.63.13. Assurance Withdrawal​

An assurance conclusion MAY be withdrawn.

Withdrawal SHALL preserve:

  • original conclusion;
  • withdrawing authority;
  • reason;
  • effective time;
  • affected publications;
  • notification requirements;
  • remediation;
  • provenance.

23.63.14. Assurance Replay​

The Runtime SHALL support assurance replay using the historical subject snapshot, Validation Outcomes, evidence, assurance profile, assurer authority and temporal state.

23.63.15. Assurance Explanation​

The Runtime SHALL explain:

  • assurance scope;
  • assurance level;
  • assurer identity;
  • independence;
  • evidence reviewed;
  • procedures performed;
  • findings;
  • limitations;
  • conclusion;
  • validity period.

23.64. Emergency Authority​

Emergency Authority is exceptional constitutional authority activated to address an urgent threat, disruption, legal obligation or material operational risk where ordinary governance processes cannot complete within the required time.

Emergency Authority SHALL be narrowly scoped, time-limited, observable and subject to retrospective review.

Emergency Authority SHALL NOT become a permanent alternative governance path.

23.64.1. Emergency Declaration​

Every emergency activation SHALL originate from an Emergency Declaration possessing:

  • Emergency Declaration Identifier;
  • emergency type;
  • declaring authority;
  • legal or policy basis;
  • triggering event;
  • affected scope;
  • tenant;
  • jurisdiction;
  • start time;
  • maximum duration;
  • permitted actions;
  • prohibited actions;
  • controls bypassed;
  • compensating controls;
  • required notifications;
  • review requirements;
  • provenance.

23.64.2. Emergency Types​

Emergency Types MAY include:

  • security incident;
  • data-integrity incident;
  • regulatory deadline;
  • public-safety issue;
  • service continuity incident;
  • environmental incident;
  • assurance failure;
  • evidence compromise;
  • supply-chain disruption;
  • legal injunction;
  • constitutional runtime failure.

23.64.3. Emergency Trigger​

Emergency activation SHALL require a governed trigger.

A technical alert alone SHALL not establish Emergency Authority unless the Emergency Policy recognises that alert class and validates its evidence.

23.64.4. Declaring Authority​

The declaring authority SHALL possess explicit authority to declare the relevant Emergency Type.

Emergency declaration authority SHALL remain distinct from authority to perform every emergency action.

23.64.5. Emergency Scope​

Emergency scope SHALL define:

  • affected subjects;
  • affected Modules;
  • affected Components;
  • tenants;
  • jurisdictions;
  • permitted actions;
  • prohibited actions;
  • data scope;
  • publication scope;
  • side-effect scope;
  • temporal scope.

23.64.6. Controls Bypassed​

Every bypassed or relaxed control SHALL be explicitly identified.

Examples include:

  • shortened approval sequence;
  • temporary SoD exception;
  • reduced evidence threshold;
  • emergency Runtime Bundle activation;
  • emergency publication;
  • emergency access;
  • delayed assurance;
  • temporary fallback source.

Controls SHALL NOT be silently disabled.

23.64.7. Non-Bypassable Controls​

The Constitution MAY declare controls that Emergency Authority cannot bypass.

These MAY include:

  • tenant isolation;
  • immutable audit;
  • required emergency provenance;
  • prohibition on concealed publication;
  • prohibition on self-expanding authority;
  • prohibition on deleting evidence;
  • prohibition on presenting provisional knowledge as assured;
  • prohibition on indefinite emergency duration.

23.64.8. Compensating Controls​

Compensating controls MAY include:

  • enhanced monitoring;
  • dual acknowledgement;
  • transaction limits;
  • restricted duration;
  • independent notification;
  • post-action validation;
  • post-action assurance;
  • immutable event capture;
  • mandatory retrospective approval;
  • automatic rollback readiness.

23.64.9. Emergency Activation​

Activation SHALL require:

  • declaration validation;
  • declaring authority validation;
  • scope validation;
  • duration validation;
  • compensating-control readiness;
  • HECATE validation;
  • Runtime Manifest update;
  • notification;
  • provenance.

23.64.10. Emergency Runtime Mode​

Emergency Runtime Mode SHALL be explicit in the Runtime Context and Execution Manifest.

Every Runtime Outcome produced in emergency mode SHALL preserve that status.

23.64.11. Emergency Monitoring​

The Runtime SHALL continuously monitor:

  • elapsed duration;
  • scope use;
  • actions performed;
  • controls bypassed;
  • compensating-control effectiveness;
  • findings;
  • side effects;
  • authority status;
  • emergency conditions.

23.64.12. Emergency Expiration​

Emergency Authority SHALL expire automatically at the earliest of:

  • declared end time;
  • maximum duration;
  • emergency termination;
  • authority revocation;
  • condition resolution;
  • policy-mandated review failure.

Expiration SHALL prevent new emergency actions.

23.64.13. Emergency Extension​

Extension SHALL require:

  • continuing emergency evidence;
  • authorised decision;
  • renewed scope;
  • renewed duration;
  • review of bypassed controls;
  • review of compensating controls;
  • HECATE validation;
  • provenance.

Automatic indefinite renewal SHALL be prohibited.

23.64.14. Emergency Termination​

Termination SHALL:

  • stop new emergency actions;
  • resolve or suspend active executions;
  • restore ordinary controls;
  • invalidate emergency authority;
  • preserve final emergency state;
  • trigger retrospective review;
  • trigger impact analysis.

23.64.15. Retrospective Review​

Every material emergency use SHALL undergo retrospective review.

The review SHALL evaluate:

  • trigger legitimacy;
  • authority;
  • scope;
  • actions;
  • controls bypassed;
  • compensating controls;
  • outcomes;
  • unintended effects;
  • findings;
  • required remediation;
  • policy improvement.

23.64.16. Emergency Evidence​

Emergency Evidence SHALL preserve:

  • trigger evidence;
  • declaration;
  • authority;
  • actions;
  • approvals;
  • notifications;
  • monitoring;
  • expiration;
  • review;
  • remediation;
  • provenance.

23.65. Governance Escalation​

Governance Escalation is the governed transfer of an unresolved decision, conflict, finding, risk or authority question to a higher, broader or more specialised governance authority.

Escalation SHALL not be implemented as an informal notification alone.

23.65.1. Escalation Object​

Every material escalation SHALL possess:

  • Escalation Identifier;
  • escalation type;
  • initiating subject;
  • initiating decision or finding;
  • trigger;
  • current authority;
  • target authority;
  • scope;
  • severity;
  • materiality;
  • urgency;
  • due date;
  • required decision;
  • evidence package;
  • lifecycle;
  • provenance.

23.65.2. Escalation Types​

Escalation Types MAY include:

  • authority escalation;
  • policy escalation;
  • conflict escalation;
  • validation escalation;
  • assurance escalation;
  • security escalation;
  • regulatory escalation;
  • tenant escalation;
  • cross-tenant escalation;
  • Module escalation;
  • architecture escalation;
  • emergency escalation;
  • appeal;
  • deadlock resolution.

23.65.3. Escalation Triggers​

Triggers MAY include:

  • unresolved authority;
  • unresolved conflict;
  • blocked approval;
  • expired approval;
  • material Validation Finding;
  • failed assurance gate;
  • SoD conflict;
  • repeated override;
  • repeated waiver;
  • emergency threshold;
  • policy gap;
  • jurisdictional conflict;
  • tenant-Core conflict;
  • runtime drift;
  • evidence compromise;
  • missed governance deadline.

23.65.4. Escalation Route​

The applicable Governance Profile SHALL define the Escalation Route.

Routes MAY include:

  • line management;
  • object owner;
  • steward;
  • Architecture Council;
  • Constitutional Authority;
  • legal authority;
  • compliance authority;
  • assurance authority;
  • security authority;
  • tenant governance board;
  • regulator;
  • external verifier.

23.65.5. Escalation Authority​

The actor initiating escalation SHALL possess authority to escalate or shall be permitted by policy to raise a protected escalation.

Whistleblowing and protected reporting MAY bypass ordinary management routes where law or policy requires.

23.65.6. Escalation Priority​

Priority MAY consider:

  • severity;
  • materiality;
  • regulatory impact;
  • assurance impact;
  • tenant count;
  • affected reports;
  • affected publications;
  • time sensitivity;
  • public impact;
  • environmental impact;
  • security impact;
  • systemic risk.

23.65.7. Escalation Service Level​

Escalation policies MAY define:

  • acknowledgement time;
  • decision time;
  • interim-control time;
  • notification time;
  • remediation time;
  • review time.

Missed service levels SHALL produce further escalation or explicit exception.

23.65.8. Escalation Evidence Package​

The package SHOULD include:

  • originating request;
  • Runtime Context;
  • affected subject;
  • policies;
  • authority resolution;
  • findings;
  • conflicts;
  • evidence;
  • prior decisions;
  • alternatives;
  • impact analysis;
  • requested decision;
  • provenance.

23.65.9. Escalation Lifecycle​

Raised
        │
        ▼
Acknowledged
        │
        ▼
Assigned
        │
        ▼
Under Review
        │
        ├──► Additional Evidence Required
        ├──► Reassigned
        ├──► Suspended
        ▼
Decision Issued
        │
        ▼
Actioned
        │
        ▼
Verified
        │
        ▼
Closed

23.65.10. Escalation Decision​

Decision classes MAY include:

  • Confirm;
  • Reverse;
  • Modify;
  • Approve;
  • Reject;
  • Require Remediation;
  • Require Assurance;
  • Require Policy Change;
  • Require Emergency Action;
  • Refer Externally;
  • Unable to Decide.

23.65.11. Deadlock Resolution​

A governance deadlock SHALL be represented explicitly.

Deadlock resolution MAY use:

  • higher authority;
  • independent authority;
  • predefined casting authority;
  • external verifier;
  • arbitration;
  • regulatory referral;
  • temporary suspension;
  • constitutional amendment process.

Implementation administrators SHALL NOT resolve constitutional deadlock merely through technical privilege.

23.65.12. Appeal​

A governed decision MAY be appealable.

An Appeal SHALL identify:

  • appealed decision;
  • appellant;
  • appeal authority;
  • grounds;
  • evidence;
  • deadline;
  • permitted outcomes;
  • finality policy;
  • provenance.

23.65.13. Cross-Module Escalation​

Where an issue spans Modules, escalation SHALL preserve each Module’s authority and the Components involved.

Pergamum Pulse SHALL preserve both Module and Component lineage.

23.65.14. Cross-Tenant Escalation​

Cross-tenant escalation SHALL not expose tenant-specific information beyond the authorised disclosure profile.

Aggregated systemic issues MAY be escalated without revealing protected tenant content.

23.65.15. Regulatory Escalation​

Where law or regulation requires notification or referral, the Runtime SHALL preserve:

  • legal basis;
  • notifying authority;
  • regulator;
  • scope;
  • time requirement;
  • content;
  • confidentiality;
  • acknowledgement;
  • follow-up;
  • provenance.

23.65.16. Escalation Closure​

Escalation SHALL close only when:

  • a decision exists;
  • required actions are complete or governed as open;
  • affected executions are reconciled;
  • required validation passes;
  • evidence is complete;
  • review requirements are satisfied;
  • provenance is sealed.

23.65.17. Pergamum Pulse Analysis​

Pergamum Pulse MAY analyse:

  • escalation frequency;
  • delayed decisions;
  • recurring policy gaps;
  • authority bottlenecks;
  • tenant divergence;
  • Module-level escalation risk;
  • unresolved deadlocks;
  • repeated emergency escalation;
  • assurance escalation patterns;
  • systemic governance debt.

23.66. Governance Evidence​

Governance Evidence is the governed evidence demonstrating that authority, delegation, approval, assurance, separation of duties, emergency controls and escalation requirements were satisfied.

Governance Evidence SHALL be captured as governance occurs rather than reconstructed solely from operational logs.

23.66.1. Governance Evidence Object​

Every material Governance Evidence Object SHALL possess:

  • Governance Evidence Identifier;
  • evidence type;
  • governed action;
  • governed subject;
  • actor;
  • authority;
  • source;
  • issuer;
  • creation time;
  • applicable period;
  • integrity;
  • signature status;
  • confidentiality;
  • retention;
  • provenance.

23.66.2. Evidence Types​

Governance Evidence MAY include:

  • Authority Assignment;
  • Role membership;
  • Delegation instrument;
  • acceptance record;
  • approval decision;
  • rejection decision;
  • SoD evaluation;
  • conflict-of-interest declaration;
  • assurance engagement;
  • accreditation;
  • certification;
  • verifier independence declaration;
  • emergency declaration;
  • emergency review;
  • escalation decision;
  • board resolution;
  • signed policy;
  • meeting record;
  • digital signature;
  • workflow event;
  • system attestation;
  • Runtime Manifest;
  • audit record.

23.66.3. Authority Evidence​

Authority Evidence SHALL support:

  • identity;
  • Role;
  • assignment;
  • delegation;
  • scope;
  • purpose;
  • temporal validity;
  • tenant;
  • jurisdiction;
  • revocation status;
  • Authority Chain.

23.66.4. Approval Evidence​

Approval Evidence SHALL preserve:

  • approver;
  • authority;
  • subject version;
  • content fingerprint;
  • Context Fingerprint;
  • decision;
  • conditions;
  • timestamp;
  • expiration;
  • signature;
  • provenance.

23.66.5. Separation-of-Duties Evidence​

SoD Evidence SHALL preserve:

  • evaluated policy;
  • actors;
  • Roles;
  • actions;
  • relationships;
  • historical participation;
  • conflict result;
  • exception;
  • compensating controls;
  • provenance.

23.66.6. Assurance Evidence​

Assurance Evidence SHALL preserve:

  • engagement;
  • assurer;
  • authority;
  • independence;
  • scope;
  • subject snapshot;
  • evidence package;
  • procedures;
  • findings;
  • limitations;
  • conclusion;
  • validity period;
  • provenance.

23.66.7. Emergency Evidence​

Emergency Evidence SHALL preserve:

  • trigger;
  • declaration;
  • authority;
  • scope;
  • controls bypassed;
  • compensating controls;
  • actions;
  • monitoring;
  • expiration;
  • retrospective review;
  • remediation;
  • provenance.

23.66.8. Escalation Evidence​

Escalation Evidence SHALL preserve:

  • trigger;
  • originating decision or finding;
  • route;
  • authorities;
  • evidence package;
  • interim controls;
  • decision;
  • actions;
  • closure;
  • provenance.

23.66.9. Evidence Integrity​

Integrity mechanisms MAY include:

  • cryptographic hashes;
  • digital signatures;
  • qualified electronic signatures where applicable;
  • trusted timestamps;
  • append-only stores;
  • transparency logs;
  • immutable event streams;
  • hardware-backed attestations;
  • replicated evidence vaults.

The mechanism SHALL match the constitutional and assurance significance of the governed action.

23.66.10. Signature Validation​

HECATE MAY validate:

  • signer identity;
  • signing authority;
  • certificate chain;
  • algorithm;
  • signed scope;
  • content digest;
  • signature time;
  • revocation status;
  • trust anchor;
  • legal validity where applicable.

23.66.11. Governance Evidence Chain​

Governance Evidence SHOULD form a Governance Evidence Graph.

Authority Assignment
        │
        supports
        ▼
Authority Resolution
        │
        permits
        ▼
Approval Decision
        │
        satisfies
        ▼
Approval Gate
        │
        enables
        ▼
Governed Execution
        │
        produces
        ▼
Runtime Outcome

Every relationship SHALL preserve identity, context, time and provenance.

23.66.12. Evidence Completeness​

Governance Evidence completeness MAY be:

  • complete;
  • complete with controlled redaction;
  • partially complete;
  • materially incomplete;
  • reconstructed;
  • disputed;
  • unavailable.

A materially incomplete evidence chain SHALL prevent unqualified high-assurance governance conclusions.

23.66.13. Evidence Redaction​

Redaction SHALL preserve:

  • the fact of redaction;
  • redacting authority;
  • legal or policy basis;
  • scope;
  • integrity of remaining evidence;
  • controlled access path;
  • provenance.

Redaction SHALL NOT conceal that a governance gate depended upon protected evidence.

23.66.14. Evidence Retention​

Retention SHALL be governed by:

  • constitutional policy;
  • jurisdiction;
  • reporting obligation;
  • assurance requirement;
  • legal hold;
  • contractual obligation;
  • tenant policy;
  • evidentiary significance;
  • privacy requirement.

Deletion or anonymisation SHALL itself produce governed provenance where lawful.

23.66.15. Evidence Access​

Governance Evidence access SHALL be controlled by:

  • purpose;
  • Role;
  • tenant;
  • jurisdiction;
  • confidentiality;
  • legal privilege;
  • assurance engagement;
  • investigation scope;
  • regulatory authority.

Access to evidence SHALL not imply authority to modify it.

23.66.16. Evidence Export​

Evidence MAY be exported for:

  • internal audit;
  • external assurance;
  • regulatory review;
  • litigation or dispute;
  • customer review;
  • certification;
  • incident investigation;
  • governance review.

Exports SHALL preserve identity, integrity, scope, redaction state and provenance.

23.66.17. Governance Replay​

The Runtime SHALL support governance replay using historical:

  • policies;
  • Roles;
  • assignments;
  • delegations;
  • authority graph;
  • SoD state;
  • approvals;
  • assurance evidence;
  • emergency state;
  • escalation state;
  • Runtime Context.

23.66.18. Governance Diff​

A Governance Diff SHOULD identify changes in:

  • policy;
  • authority;
  • assignment;
  • delegation;
  • approver;
  • assurance profile;
  • SoD state;
  • emergency state;
  • escalation;
  • evidence;
  • decision.

23.66.19. Governance Impact Analysis​

Changes to governance knowledge SHALL support impact analysis over:

  • active Authority Outcomes;
  • active delegations;
  • pending approvals;
  • active assurance engagements;
  • Runtime Bundles;
  • Execution Plans;
  • publications;
  • reports;
  • workflows;
  • agents;
  • tenants;
  • Modules;
  • Components.

23.66.20. HECATE Validation​

HECATE SHALL validate Governance Evidence for:

  • identity;
  • applicability;
  • authority;
  • integrity;
  • temporal validity;
  • scope;
  • signature;
  • chain completeness;
  • tenant isolation;
  • redaction validity;
  • retention compliance;
  • provenance completeness.

23.66.21. Pergamum Pulse Integration​

Pergamum Pulse MAY derive intelligence including:

  • authority concentration;
  • stale assignments;
  • risky delegations;
  • approval bottlenecks;
  • SoD conflicts;
  • excessive waivers;
  • assurance independence risk;
  • emergency-authority frequency;
  • escalation latency;
  • governance evidence gaps;
  • Module-level governance risk;
  • Component-level governance drift;
  • tenant divergence;
  • systemic governance debt.

Pergamum Pulse SHALL preserve:

  • Module lineage;
  • Component lineage;
  • authority lineage;
  • Role lineage;
  • assignment lineage;
  • delegation lineage;
  • gate lineage;
  • evidence lineage;
  • temporal validity;
  • tenant isolation;
  • provenance.

Derived intelligence SHALL remain Intelligence Layer assertions until governed activation.

Part VI Conformance​

A Constitutional Runtime Framework implementation conforms to Part VI where it:

  1. treats governance as an executable constitutional runtime rather than static metadata;
  2. distinguishes identity, access, capability and constitutional authority;
  3. requires explicit Governance Requests or equivalent governed execution metadata;
  4. resolves Governance Profiles through Constitutional Resolution Policies;
  5. represents Governance Policies as governed Constitutional Objects;
  6. produces explicit Governance Decisions rather than implicit permission;
  7. resolves authority through complete Authority Chains;
  8. enforces least authority for actors, Components and agents;
  9. prevents AI agents and Runtime Components from expanding or approving their own authority;
  10. represents delegation as bounded, temporal, revocable and non-expansive;
  11. prohibits delegation cycles and unauthorised sub-delegation;
  12. enforces static and dynamic separation of duties;
  13. represents SoD exceptions and compensating controls explicitly;
  14. binds approval to subject version, content fingerprint and Runtime Context;
  15. enforces approval quorum, sequence, conditions, expiration and revocation;
  16. distinguishes validation, approval and assurance;
  17. validates assurer authority, competence, scope and independence;
  18. represents Emergency Authority as narrow, time-limited and retrospectively reviewed;
  19. prohibits silent control bypass in emergency mode;
  20. represents escalation as a governed object with routes, service levels and decisions;
  21. captures Governance Evidence as governance occurs;
  22. supports governance replay, diff and impact analysis;
  23. validates Governance Evidence through HECATE;
  24. preserves both Module and Component lineage;
  25. prevents Indeterminate, Not Evaluated or expired governance state from being interpreted as permission.

Part VI Foundational Principle​

Governance and Authority Runtime is the governed constitutional mechanism through which ZAYAZ determines who or what may act, upon which subject, for which purpose, within which scope, under which conditions and for which period.

Identity SHALL not imply authority. Technical access SHALL not imply constitutional permission. Capability SHALL not imply approval. Delegation SHALL not exceed its source authority. Approval SHALL bind to an identifiable subject version and context. Assurance SHALL remain independent from preparation, validation and governance consent. Emergency Authority SHALL remain exceptional, bounded, observable and automatically expiring.

Every Governance Decision SHALL preserve its Governance Request, Runtime Context, Governance Profile, policies, Authority Chain, Role and assignment lineage, delegation state, separation-of-duties evaluation, approval gates, assurance gates, emergency state, escalation state, Governance Evidence, Runtime Bundle, Module lineage, Component lineage and complete provenance.

By making governance executable, deterministic, replayable and independently auditable, ZAYAZ ensures that every constitutional action remains accountable from authority origin through execution, approval, assurance, publication, emergency use and final evidence retention.



GitHub RepoRequest for Change (RFC)
Last updated on by ZAYAZ