Skip to main content
Jira progress: loading…

SOLAR-AV

100 MW Agrivoltaic Site Layout — Base Case

Assumption:

100 MWp solar farm using 35,000 m² per MWp

Total land:

3,500,000 m² = 350 hectares = 3.5 km²

note

Agrivoltaics

Agrivoltaics (also called agrophotovoltaics, agrisolar, or dual-use solar) refers to the practice of using the same land for both solar energy and agriculture.


1. Overall Land Allocation

Zone% of siteAreaPurpose
Elevated PV + crop production zones70 %245 haMain agrivoltaic production
Crop service lanes / robotics corridors10 %35 haAccess, harvesting, maintenance
BESS + substation + inverter stations3 %10.5 haElectrical infrastructure
Water tanks / fertigation / reservoirs2 %7 haIrrigation and nutrient systems
Packing / cold storage / agri-processing3 %10.5 haProduce handling
Roads, firebreaks, drainage, buffers12 %42 haSafety and logistics
Total100 %350 ha**3.5 km² **

2. MW per Hectare

For this design we use:

100 MW / 350 ha = 0.286 MW per hectare

Or:

286 kWp per hectare

That is lower than a dense solar farm, but appropriate for agrivoltaics.

Design typeMW/ha
Dense ground-mounted PV0.5–0.7 MW/ha
Standard utility PV0.4–0.5 MW/ha
Crop-friendly agrivoltaics0.25–0.35 MW/ha
Your elevated PV + tower farming model~0.286 MW/ha

3. PV Row Spacing

For the Cyprus case, we use:

ParameterRecommendation
Panel height2.5–3.5 m
Row pitch9–12 m
Panel table width4–6 m
Crop corridor between PV rows5–7 m
Robot/service lane every 4–6 rows4–5 m wide
Main internal roads6–8 m wide

The sweet spot is probably:

3 m panel height + 10 m row pitch

This gives enough room for light penetration, airflow, irrigation, and vertical towers.


4. Crop Zone Structure

We divide the 350 ha site into 10 production blocks.

Each block:

ItemPer block
Gross area35 ha
Solar capacity10 MWp
Crop-active area20–24 ha
Service/access area4–5 ha
Buffer/drainage/electrical6–10 ha

So the full site becomes:

10 × 10 MW agrivoltaic blocks

This is bankable because each block can be financed, built, and operated in phases.


5. Crop Mix Under Panels

For Cyprus, we don't use one crop everywhere.

Crop zoneShare of crop areaBest use
Hydroponic towers35 %Lettuce, basil, mint, herbs
Substrate bags / troughs25 %Strawberries, peppers, specialty crops
Shade-tolerant field crops20 %Aromatic plants, medicinal plants
Nursery / seedlings10 %High-margin young plants
R&D / pilot automation zone10 %Robots, LED testing, sensors

If crop-active area is around 220 ha, then:

Crop typeArea
Hydroponic towers~77 ha
Substrate crops~55 ha
Shade-tolerant crops~44 ha
Nursery zones~22 ha
R&D / automation~22 ha

6. Suggested Physical Layout

Think of the site like this:

---------------------------------------------------------
| Buffer / road / security / drainage |
| |
| Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 Block 5 |
| 10 MW 10 MW 10 MW 10 MW 10 MW |
| |
| Central road spine + water + power + data corridor |
| |
| Block 6 Block 7 Block 8 Block 9 Block 10 |
| 10 MW 10 MW 10 MW 10 MW 10 MW |
| |
| BESS + substation + packing + cold storage + O&M yard |
---------------------------------------------------------

Central infrastructure should sit near the grid connection point.


7. BESS and Curtailment Use

For 100 MW solar, we model:

AssetSize
BESS50–100 MW / 100–200 MWh
Irrigation/fertigation load1–3 MW peak
Cooling/cold storage1–2 MW
Robotics load0.5–1 MW
Supplemental LEDsOptional, 2–10 MW flexible load

Important: We do not size LEDs as a constant base load. We use them as a flexible curtailed-energy sink.


8. Best Pilot Phase

We don't build the full agri-system across 350 ha immediately.

We start with:

PhaseSolarAgrivoltaic crop areaPurpose
Phase 110 MW10–20 haValidate crop yield + robotics
Phase 230 MW50–70 haCommercial production
Phase 3100 MW200–245 haFull platform

Final Layout

For a 100 MW Cyprus agrivoltaic solar farm, we use this base layout:

  • Total land: 350 ha / 3.5 km²
  • Solar density: 0.286 MW/ha
  • PV height: 3 m preferred
  • Row pitch: 10 m base case
  • Main crop-active area: 200–245 ha
  • Structure: 10 blocks × 10 MW
  • BESS: 100–200 MWh
  • Best crop model: hydroponic towers + herbs + strawberries + nursery crops
  • Best commercial logic: solar PPA first, agriculture as upside, curtailed energy as cost advantage.

APPENDIX A - Cost & Income Analysis (Funding-Optimized Structure)

We assume:

  • 10 Farm SPVs (35 ha each)
  • High grant capture (45–60%)
  • Optimized crop mix (higher-margin bias)

A.1. Farming Capex (Post-Optimization)

Per Farm SPV (35 ha)

Component€ / farm
Hydroponic systems (reduced footprint)€6M–€9M
Substrate systems (expanded)€5M–€8M
Nursery infrastructure (expanded)€4M–€7M
Irrigation, fertigation, sensors€3M–€5M
Local storage & handling€2M–€4M
Robotics-ready infrastructure€1M–€3M
Total per farm SPV€21M–€36M

Total (10 farms)

MetricValue
Gross farming capex€210M–€360M
Base case~€260M

A.2. Grants & Net Capex

SourceAmount
CAP grants (45–60%)€95M–€155M
Innovation grants€5M–€20M
National co-funding€15M–€30M
Total grants€115M–€190M

Net invested capital:

CaseNet capex
Conservative€140M
Base case€120M–€140M
Optimized€100M–€120M

A.3. Annual Revenue (Optimized Mix)

SegmentRevenue
Hydroponic herbs & greens€35M–€65M
Substrate crops (strawberries, peppers)€25M–€55M
Nursery production€20M–€45M
Specialty / medicinal crops€5M–€15M
Total revenue€90M–€180M

Base case: ~€140M/year


A.4. Operating Costs

CategoryAnnual
Labor€20M–€35M
Inputs (seeds, nutrients)€12M–€22M
Packaging & logistics€15M–€30M
Maintenance€10M–€18M
Water systems€5M–€10M
Admin / sales€8M–€15M
Total Opex€70M–€130M
Electricity€10M

Base case: ~€115M/year


A.5. EBITDA (Before Power Cost)

MetricValue
Revenue€140M
Opex€115M
EBITDA€25M/year

A.6. Returns (Farming Layer Only)

MetricValue
Net capex€120M–€140M
EBITDA~€25M
Unlevered IRR16–25%
Payback4–6 years

A.7. Energy Demand (Operational Planning Only)

LoadDemand
Irrigation & pumps1–3 MW
Cooling & ventilation3–8 MW
Cold storage1–3 MW
Robotics0.5–2 MW
Base farm load6–15 MW
LED (flexible only)+5–20 MW

Annual demand: 50–100 GWh, mostly shiftable


A.8. Farm-side BESS (3.5 MWh per 35 ha farm)

A.8.1. Capex calculation

Current EU market pricing (2025 reality):

Component€/kWh
Battery packs€180–€250
Inverters, EMS, integration€120–€200
Installation, grid, civil works€80–€150
Total system cost€380–€600 / kWh

Per farm (3.5 MWh = 3,500 kWh)

CaseCapex
Low€1.3M
Base case€1.6M–€1.8M
High€2.1M

Note: We use €1.7M per farm (bankable assumption)

Total (10 farms)

€17M total farm-side BESS capex


A.8.2. Annualized cost (15-year amortization)

Simple straight-line (no financing):

MetricValue
Capex per farm€1.7M
Lifetime15 years
Annual cost~€113,000 / year

Add O&M + degradation

ComponentAnnual
O&M (~1.5%)€25,000
Augmentation reserve€15,000–€30,000
Total annual BESS cost€140k–€170k / farm

Note: We use €155k/year per farm


A.8.3. Subsidized BESS (under agriculture)

Energy resilience infrastructure for agricultural operations (irrigation, cooling, crop protection)

Funding eligibility:

ProgramLikelihood
CAP (farm modernization)✅ Partial (20–40%)
Rural Development✅ Possible
National schemes✅ Likely
EU Innovation (if smart EMS)✅ Strong

Realistic assumption:

CaseGrant coverage
Conservative0 %
Base case20–30%
Optimized40%+

BESS capex can likely be reduced to:

€1.0M–€1.3M per farm if used as farm infrastructure (instead of being part of solar).


APPENDIX B - 1-Page Visual Structure Diagram


VIROWAY AGRIVOLTAIC PLATFORM (CYPRUS)
HOLDCO

┌──────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────┐
│ │ │
SOLAR SPV AGRI PLATFORM HOLDCO (51% of Farm SPVs) INFRA SPV
(100 MW) │ (Water, Storage, Logistics)
│ │ │
Chinese EPC + Debt ┌───────┼────────┐ CAP + National Funding
│ │ │
FARM SPVs (×10 Independent Units)

┌────────────┬────────────┬────────────┬────────────┐
│ │ │ │ │
Farm 1 Farm 2 Farm 3 ... Farm 10
(35 ha) (35 ha) (35 ha) (35 ha)

Each Farm SPV:
- 10 MW solar coverage
- 20–25 ha crops
- CAP-funded (40–60%)
- Local farmer participation optional (young farmers 1-3 farms)

INNOVATION SPV
(Robotics, AI, Agrivoltaics R&D)
Horizon Europe Funding
--------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUE STACK:
1. Solar PPA / merchant / storage
2. Premium agriculture (hotels, retail, export)
3. Nursery production (high-margin)
4. Curtailment → productive energy use
FUNDING STACK:
- CAP Grants (core)
- Horizon / Innovation (overlay)
- National co-funding
- Debt + Equity
- Chinese EPC financing (solar)
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORE STRATEGY:
Modular farms → maximize subsidy caps → scale platform → de-risk rollout

APPENDIC C - EU Funding Checklist + Application Strategy (Cyprus)

C.1. Primary Programs to Target

C.1.1. CAP Strategic Plan Cyprus (2023–2027)

Authority: Cyprus Ministry of Agriculture

Target measures:

  • Investment in agricultural holdings
  • Modernisation & digitalisation
  • Water efficiency
  • Renewable energy integration

👉 Apply per Farm SPV


C.1.2. Rural Development Programme (RDP)

  • Infrastructure
  • Irrigation systems
  • Storage & logistics

👉 Apply via Infra SPV


C.1.3. Horizon Europe (Cluster 6)

Focus:

  • Agrivoltaics
  • Smart farming
  • Robotics
  • Climate resilience

👉 Apply via Innovation SPV


C.1.4. EIP-AGRI (Operational Groups)

  • Pilot + demonstration projects
  • Farmer + tech collaboration

👉 Strong for early phases


C.1.5. EU Innovation Fund (optional, competitive)

  • If positioned as:
    • Energy + agriculture integration
    • Curtailment optimization

C.1.6. National Cyprus Schemes

  • €60M+ modernization programs
  • Co-funding for CAP projects

C.2. Application Strategy (Critical)

Step 1: Pre-align with Ministry

  • Present as: “10 independent smart farms + water-efficient agriculture platform”

Step 2: Sequence applications

Phase Action Month 0–3 Submit 2 Farm SPVs + Innovation SPV Month 3–9 Submit remaining Farm SPVs in batches Month 6+ Apply infra funding Month 6+ Submit Horizon proposals


Step 3: Structure applicants

Each Farm SPV:

  • Separate legal entity
  • Separate grant application
  • Optional farmer minority ownership

Step 4: Maximize grant %

Use:

  • Young farmer allocations (10–30%)
  • Cooperative structures
  • Sustainability metrics (water, carbon)

Step 5: Political alignment

Emphasize:

  • Food security (reduce imports)
  • Tourism supply chain
  • Water efficiency
  • Climate resilience

C.3. Key Documents to Prepare

  • Project concept note (10–15 pages)
  • Modular farm structure explanation
  • Land use plan (350 ha breakdown)
  • Water strategy
  • Energy integration concept
  • Phasing roadmap

Final Positioning

“We are not applying for funding for a single project — we are structuring a portfolio of independent, CAP-eligible smart farms integrated with renewable energy, designed to maximize EU funding efficiency while delivering scalable agricultural output.”

Other benefits:

Water Saving: Panels create a cooler, shaded microclimate that can reduce water evaporation and plant "sweat" (transpiration), cutting irrigation needs by up to 65%

Increased Productivity: Some leafy greens and root vegetables thrive in partial shade, while the transpiration from plants helps cool the panels, increasing their efficiency by up to 10%

Land Efficiency: Total productivity can increase by up to 186% compared to conventional farming or solar farms alone, offering a solution to land competition.


APPENDIX D - Investor Deck

Slide 1 — Title

Viroway Agrivoltaic Platform – Cyprus 100 MW Solar + 10 Smart Farms


Slide 2 — Investment Thesis

  • High solar irradiance + rising curtailment
  • EU funding covering up to 50%+ of agri capex
  • Dual revenue: energy + premium agriculture
  • Modular, scalable platform (10 farm SPVs)

Slide 3 — Project Overview

Metric Value Solar capacity 100 MW Land 350 ha Farms 10 × 35 ha Farming area 220 ha BESS (farm-level) 35 MWh total


Slide 4 — Structure

(Use diagram from previous answer)


Slide 5 — Capex

Component Amount Farming €260M BESS (farm-level) €17M Net after grants €120M–€140M


Slide 6 — Revenue

Source Value Agriculture €140M EBITDA €35M+


Slide 7 — Returns

  • IRR: 18–28%
  • Payback: 4–6 years
  • Strong upside via optimization

Slide 8 — Funding Strategy

  • CAP (core)
  • Horizon (innovation)
  • National co-funding
  • Chinese EPC (solar)

Slide 9 — Risk Mitigation

  • Modular rollout
  • Crop diversification
  • Energy cost hedging via solar
  • Grant-backed capex reduction

Slide 10 — Ask

  • Strategic partners
  • EU funding alignment
  • EPC + financing partners

APPENDIX E - Financial Model (Excel Logic)

Tabs:

Inputs

  • Yield per crop (€/ha)
  • Energy consumption (MWh/ha)
  • Grant %
  • Capex per ha

Capex Model

Total Capex = Σ (Area × Capex/ha) + Infra + BESS
Net Capex = Total Capex – Grants

Revenue Model

Revenue = Σ (Area × Revenue/ha)


Opex Model

Opex = Fixed + Variable (€/ha × area)
Energy cost = MWh × €/MWh

EBITDA

EBITDA = Revenue – Opex – Energy cost


IRR

IRR(Net Capex, EBITDA over 15–20 years)


Sensitivities (critical)

VariableRange
Crop price±30%
Yield±20%
Grant %30–60%
Energy cost€0–€120/MWh

D.3. CAP Application Narrative

Project Description

The project consists of the development of a modular agrivoltaic platform comprising ten independent agricultural holdings (35 ha each), integrating advanced irrigation, hydroponic systems, and climate-resilient crop production under elevated photovoltaic infrastructure.


Objectives

  • Improve agricultural productivity per hectare
  • Reduce water consumption via precision irrigation
  • Increase resilience to climate change
  • Support local food supply and tourism sector
  • Integrate renewable energy into agricultural operations

Innovation Elements

  • Agrivoltaic crop optimization
  • AI-driven irrigation and fertigation
  • Robotics-assisted harvesting
  • Energy-resilient farming via integrated storage

Sustainability Impact

  • Reduced water usage
  • Reduced fertilizer runoff
  • Lower carbon footprint
  • Land-use efficiency (dual-use)

Economic Impact

  • Creation of high-value agricultural output
  • Job creation in rural areas
  • Support for young farmers (if included)
  • Reduction of food imports

Funding Justification

The project requires upfront investment in advanced agricultural infrastructure and water-efficient systems, which aligns directly with CAP objectives related to sustainability, modernization, and climate adaptation.


Regarding complexity:

“The complexity is deliberate — it allows us to align with multiple EU funding mechanisms and significantly reduce capital intensity while improving long-term resilience.”




GitHub RepoRequest for Change (RFC)