Jira progress: loading…

AIIL-SHG

Stakeholder & Governance Interfaces

1. Stakeholder Dashboards

1.1. Purpose & Role

The Stakeholder Dashboards are the primary interface for companies and internal teams to interact with ZAYAZ AI outputs and compliance data.

Their role is to:

• Provide real-time visibility into disclosure readiness and assurance coverage.
• Surface gaps and risks proactively.
• Allow traceable drill-down from high-level KPIs to disclosure-level evidence.
• Enable auditor-ready exports for review and submission. Dashboards are not just reporting tools — they are compliance cockpit systems for sustainability leaders.

1.2. Dashboard Types

• Compliance Dashboard

  • Tracks framework coverage across ESRS, ISSB, SEC, GRI.
  • Displays disclosure completion % by framework, sector, and jurisdiction.
  • Flags missing mandatory disclosures (blocker/critical rules from Chapter “J”).
  • Shows version alignment (e.g., ESRS July 2025 amendments vs earlier draft).

• Data Health Dashboard

  • Displays validation errors (e.g., unit mismatch, missing evidence).
  • Shows assurance coverage: % of disclosures verified vs pending.
  • Tracks timeliness: last update date, lag vs filing deadlines.
  • Heatmaps of data quality by domain (Climate, Social, Governance).

• AI Governance Dashboard

  • Shows AI SLO compliance (accuracy, refusal quality, retrieval precision).
  • Displays Promotion & Rollback history (Chapter “M”).
  • Logs Go/No-Go decisions (Chapter “L”).
  • Surfaces “what changed” in AI adapters or behavior packs since last filing.

1.3. Features

• Drill-Down to Disclosure Node

  • From ESRS E1-6 → see:
    • Retrieved citations.
    • Computation Hub logs.
    • Assurance contract.
    • Linked verifier attestations.

• Change Tracking

  • “What changed since last filing” view shows:
    • New disclosures.
    • Updated values.
    • Changed methodologies.

• Export Functions

  • Audit-ready reports (PDF, CSV, JSON).
  • Regulator submission packages (XBRL/iXBRL).
  • Investor-friendly normalized ESG snapshots.

1.4. Governance Layer

• Access Control

  • Role-based dashboards (sustainability officer, CFO, verifier, regulator liaison).
  • Sensitive disclosures restricted to authorized users.

• Audit Logging

  • Every dashboard view logged with user ID, disclosure node, timestamp.
  • Immutable logs ensure regulator/auditor assurance.

• Traceability Overlay

  • Every dashboard tile includes provenance metadata:
    • Framework ID.
    • Source hash.
    • Assurance status.

1.5. Other Features

• Predictive Dashboards

  • Forecast disclosure readiness based on ingestion pipeline and supplier data flows.

• Scenario Overlays

  • Visualize climate transition risks or workforce shifts in dashboards.

• Verifier Plug-ins

  • Direct dashboards where auditors can leave comments or sign off disclosures.

• Continuous Assurance Dashboards

  • Real-time assurance heatmaps, replacing annual-only audit cycles.

2. Verifier & Assurance Interfaces

2.1. Purpose & Role

The Verifier & Assurance Interfaces provide structured access for third-party assurance providers (auditors, accredited verifiers, Big Four firms, boutique ESG specialists).

Their role is to:

• Deliver read-only, regulator-grade views of disclosures, evidence, and computations.
• Enable digital assurance contracts (see Chapter “J”) to be reviewed, signed, and tracked.
• Ensure auditor independence by offering transparency without altering underlying data.
• Streamline assurance workflows, reducing manual reconciliation work.

2.2. Interface Types

• Verifier Portal

  • A secure web interface providing auditors with:
    • Disclosure list with assurance status.
    • Linked evidence (source docs, citations, computation logs).
    • Validation errors flagged (e.g., unit mismatch).
  • Permissions: Read-only with ability to leave assurance notes or sign-off actions.

• Verifier APIs

  • REST/GraphQL APIs for automated retrieval of assurance contracts.
  • Endpoints include:
    • /assurance/contracts → Retrieve all assurance packages.
    • /assurance/{disclosure_id} → Get assurance evidence for a specific disclosure.
  • Supports bulk downloads in JSON schema for integration into verifier systems.

• Digital Assurance Contracts

  • JSON-based assurance schema (Chapter 10).
  • Verifiers can digitally sign disclosures with private keys.
  • Signed contracts stored immutably in ZAYAZ assurance ledger.
  • Assurance status auto-updated in dashboards.

2.3. Assurance Workflow

• Preparation

  • ZAYAZ packages disclosures into assurance-ready bundles (data + evidence + validation).

• Verifier Review

  • Verifier inspects disclosures in the Portal or via API.
  • Can add notes, request clarifications, or reject disclosure if evidence insufficient.

• Assurance Sign-Off

  • Verifier approves disclosure.
  • Digital Assurance Contract signed and logged.

• Feedback Integration

  • Verifier comments fed back into lifecycle (Behavioral Extract) to improve AI refusal behavior and disclosure packaging.

2.4. Governance & Auditability

• Immutable Logs

  • Every verifier action logged (view, note, sign-off).
  • Timestamps, verifier ID, and disclosure node recorded.

• Access Control

  • Role-based permissions (Verifier vs. Customer vs. Regulator).
  • Data redaction where verifiers should not see sensitive details.

• Audit Trail

  • Assurance contract + verifier log becomes part of regulator submission package (see Chapter 17).

2.5. Example Assurance Contract (JSON)

assurance-contract.json

{
  "disclosure_node": "ESRS_E1-6",
  "assurance_status": "reasonable_assurance",
  "verifier_id": "verifier_1234",
  "evidence_links": [
    "doc_hash_ae1234",
    "comp_log_7890"
  ],
  "signed_at": "2025-09-10T12:00:00Z",
  "signature": "0x8f23a9b4..."
}

2.6. Other Features

• Verifier Feedback Loops

  • Machine learning models fine-tune refusal and packaging behavior based on verifier notes.

• Cross-Assurance Visibility

  • Multi-verifier coordination (e.g., one firm verifies Climate, another verifies Social).

• Continuous Assurance

  • Near real-time verification instead of annual sign-offs.

• Regulator-Linked Assurance

  • Allow regulators to see which disclosures have independent assurance coverage.

3. Regulator Submission Interfaces

3.1. Purpose & Role

The Regulator Submission Interfaces are the ZAYAZ mechanisms for producing filings that meet regulator-mandated formats, schemas, and validations.

Their role is to:

• Generate machine-readable submissions aligned with global taxonomies (EFRAG, SEC, ISSB).
• Guarantee completeness and consistency before submission.
• Provide regulators with traceable links back to data sources, assurance contracts, and audit logs.
• Support sandbox testing for regulators before live filing.

This ensures ZAYAZ outputs are not just AI-driven narratives, but legally binding compliance filings.

3.2. Supported Formats

• EFRAG (EU CSRD/ESRS)

  • SFormat: XBRL/iXBRL aligned with EFRAG’s digital taxonomy.
  • Scope: All ESRS disclosures (E1–E5, S1–S4, G1, ESRS 1/2).
  • Features:
    • Pre-submission validation against EFRAG’s official schema.
    • Assurance status tagging (from Chapter “J”).
    • Jurisdiction routing ensures EU-only residency for submission packages.

• SEC (US)

  • Format: XBRL for EDGAR submissions.
  • Scope: SEC climate disclosures (Scope 1/2/3, risks, governance).
  • Features:
    • Integration with US GAAP/SEC reporting taxonomy.
    • SEC-specific assurance tagging.
    • Filing-ready bundles for EDGAR system.

• ISSB (Global)

  • Format: JSON/XML aligned with ISSB digital taxonomy.
  • Scope: IFRS S1 (general sustainability) + S2 (climate).
  • Features:
    • Crosswalk mapping via GDO (Chapter “G”).
    • Dual-reporting mode: output both ESRS and ISSB from single data set.

3.3. Submission Workflow

• Validation

  • ZAYAZ runs schema validation before packaging.
  • Ensures mandatory disclosures are present, with correct units.

• Packaging

  • Submissions packaged into regulator-specific bundles (e.g., .xbrl, .zip).
  • Each package includes:
    • Disclosures.
    • Linked assurance contracts.
    • Cryptographic source hashes.

• Sandbox Mode

  • Regulators can test submissions in a sandbox environment.
  • ZAYAZ provides “pre-check reports” showing likely regulator acceptance/rejection outcomes.

• Final Submission

  • Submissions exported to customer’s official regulator submission system.
  • ZAYAZ logs:
    • Submission ID.
    • Timestamp.
    • Regulatory system response.

3.4. Governance & Auditability

• Immutable Logs

  • Every submission logged with package checksum, schema version, and assurance coverage.

• Version Pinning

  • Submissions tied to specific framework version (e.g., ESRS July 2025).

• Audit Export

  • Regulators can request full trace (disclosure → evidence → assurance → submission).

3.5. Example Submission Manifest

submission-manifest.json

{
  "submission_id": "eu_esrs_2025_q4",
  "framework": "ESRS",
  "jurisdiction": "EU",
  "format": "XBRL",
  "disclosures_included": ["E1-6", "S1-12", "G1-3"],
  "assurance_coverage": "87%",
  "package_hash": "sha256:8af31d...",
  "submitted_at": "2025-09-10T14:00:00Z"
}

3.6. Other Features

• Other Jurisdictions

  • SASB industry standards (sector overlays).
  • Japan FSA climate disclosure rules.
  • India BRSR Core.

• Regulator Dashboards

  • Secure interfaces for regulators to monitor submissions in real-time.

• Zero-Knowledge Compliance Proofs

  • Enable regulators to confirm compliance without exposing sensitive data.

• Continuous Filing Mode

  • Move from annual filings to continuous, regulator-synced submissions.

4. Investor & Market Interfaces

4.1. Purpose & Role

The Investor & Market Interfaces extend ZAYAZ beyond compliance reporting, enabling financial stakeholders to consume ESG intelligence that is:

• Standardized across jurisdictions.
• Comparable between peers and sectors.
• Verified with assurance metadata.
• Decision-grade for capital allocation, risk modeling, and portfolio management.

This chapter defines how ZAYAZ packages ESG data for investors, analysts, credit rating agencies, and sustainability benchmarks.

4.2. Outputs

• Materiality Views

  • Double Materiality Overlay: Distinguishes financial materiality (investor impact) vs impact materiality (societal/ecological).
  • Sector-Specific Materiality Maps: Highlights which ESRS DRs or ISSB disclosures are critical for industries (steel, energy, finance).

• Normalized ESG Metrics

  • Metrics translated across frameworks (via GDO, Chapter 7).
  • Example: ESRS E1-6 (GHG reduction targets) normalized with ISSB S2 climate metrics.
  • Units standardized (CO₂e, $USD, MWh).

• Carbon Passport Exports

  • Entity-level GHG footprint, with provenance to Computation Hub (Chapter 8).
  • Includes Scope 1–3 breakdown and carbon intensity ratios.
  • Tagged with assurance status (self-declared vs verified).

4.3. Delivery Channels

• Investor Dashboards

  • Customizable views by sector, portfolio, or jurisdiction.
  • Drill-down to individual disclosure nodes (e.g., ESRS E1-6 targets).
  • Peer benchmarking and variance analysis.

• APIs for Market Data Providers

  • REST/GraphQL APIs serving:
    • Normalized ESG metrics.
    • Assurance coverage stats.
    • Transition pathway alignment (1.5°C / 2°C).
  • Bulk endpoints for asset managers, credit raters, and financial data platforms.

• Data Feeds

  • Scheduled delivery of ESG data snapshots (JSON, CSV, XBRL) to investor systems.
  • Integration with Bloomberg, Refinitiv, MSCI, S&P Global, and others.

4.4. Governance & Trust Layer

• Provenance Metadata

  • Every metric exported with source hash, assurance status, and framework version.

• Comparability Tags

  • Metrics flagged as comparable, partially comparable, or non-comparable across frameworks.

• Audit Hooks

  • Regulators and investors can trace investor-facing ESG data back to the same disclosures used for compliance filings.

4.5. Example Investor API Payload

api-payload.json

{
  "company_id": "cust_eu_001",
  "frameworks": ["ESRS", "ISSB"],
  "metrics": {
    "ghg_scope1": {
      "value": 120000,
      "unit": "tCO2e",
      "assurance_status": "reasonable_assurance",
      "source_hash": "sha256:afc921..."
    },
    "ghg_scope2": {
      "value": 75000,
      "unit": "tCO2e",
      "methodology": "location_based",
      "assurance_status": "limited_assurance"
    },
    "carbon_intensity": {
      "value": 220,
      "unit": "tCO2e / M€ revenue",
      "comparability": "comparable"
    }
  },
  "last_updated": "2025-09-10T09:00:00Z"
}

4.6. Other Features

• Green Finance Integration

  • Link ESG data directly into sustainable finance taxonomies (EU Taxonomy KPIs, SFDR).

• ESG Credit Ratings

  • Provide rating agencies with machine-readable disclosures for credit scoring.

• Market Signals

  • Enable investors to detect early ESG leadership or laggard trends.

• AI-Driven Scenario Analytics

  • Offer investors forward-looking ESG risk models (transition, physical, social).

5. Assurance & Governance Overlays

5.1. Purpose & Role

The Assurance & Governance Overlays provide the meta-controls that ensure stakeholder-facing outputs remain compliant, auditable, and trustable, regardless of who consumes them (company teams, verifiers, regulators, or investors).

Their role is to:

• Enforce access boundaries between different stakeholders.
• Guarantee that every stakeholder view is anchored in provenance metadata.
• Provide heatmaps and transparency layers for assurance coverage.
• Act as the governance guardrails for ZAYAZ’s entire external interface layer.

5.2. Access Control Overlays

• Role-Based Views

  • Sustainability Officers: full access to dashboards, disclosures, computations.
  • Verifiers: read-only access with ability to sign assurance contracts.
  • Regulators: submission-only views, no internal company notes.
  • Investors: normalized, assurance-tagged ESG metrics only.

• Attribute-Based Controls

  • Jurisdiction restrictions (EU data visible only to EU regulators).
  • Data residency overlays (EU-only for CSRD, global for ISSB).
  • Tiered access for sensitive data (supplier-level vs aggregated).

5.3. Provenance & Traceability Overlays

• Provenance Tags Every disclosure, metric, or export includes: Framework ID & version. Source hash (cryptographic checksum). Assurance status.

• Traceability Views Dashboards and APIs allow stakeholders to “click through” from an ESG metric to: Underlying disclosure node (GDO, Chapter “G”). Computation Hub logs (Chapter “H”). Verifier assurance contract (Chapter “J”).

• Immutable Logging All stakeholder interactions (view, sign-off, export) logged in append-only storage.

5.4. Assurance Coverage Heatmaps

• Visual Coverage Layer

  • Shows what % of disclosures are assured (reasonable/limited) vs self-declared.
  • Color-coded by domain (Climate, Social, Governance).
  • Highlights disclosure areas needing assurance ahead of filing deadlines.

• Drill-Down Capability

  • From “Climate 72% assured” → down to “Scope 1 = assured, Scope 3 = self-declared.”

• **Continuous Assurance Mode

  • Support for near real-time verifier sign-off instead of annual-only cycles.

5.5. Governance & Compliance Hooks

• Audit Trails

  • Every stakeholder-facing output linked back to evaluation logs (AI Lifecycle & Governance) and validation contracts (Data & Compliance Models).

• Compliance Snapshots

  • System can generate a point-in-time compliance snapshot, frozen for regulator/auditor inspection.

• Change Control Alerts

  • If disclosure data changes after assurance sign-off, the overlay automatically flags “assurance invalidated.”

• Regulator Mode

  • Regulators can access pre-filtered assurance logs for compliance inspection.

Other Features

• Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Compliance

  • Allow stakeholders to verify compliance without exposing sensitive underlying data.

• Federated Governance

  • Support distributed assurance models where multiple verifiers sign different sections of a disclosure.

• Automated Governance AI

  • Use anomaly detection to flag suspicious assurance coverage patterns.

• ESG DAO Concepts

  • Enable multi-stakeholder governance models where investors, regulators, and civil society co-own verification.